Thanks shibligd. It looks different and that I like, but I think it's a bit too crowded and I don't see a button to start searching. Please do not make any changes yet, as I will ask for that once I have declared the winner(s). I was just thinking, because I will probably end up liking more then one design, to also reward the second and third entry with $50 and $25 for their PSD file. Is that OK with you? JMN, thanks for your entry. So far I like yours best, it looks professional and modern. I think it's fair to say that I definitaly will want to use your design, so if you can already make some changes. Right now the searchbox is missing Nr of rooms, Nr of adults, Nr of children. Also I like how the check-in/out date button looks, but am not sure how the date would look like if entered, as I don't see the real format. Can you give me an example of that + add the nr of rooms/adults/children? Jorge05r, yes it is and I am looking forward to your entry! Thanks.
Any how its up to you to choice any one design but if you want to give reward for second and third also depend on you . Thanks for feedbacking
@sairos: I really like the general layout, only the header image I don't like. Think it's too dark/negative. Other then that I really like it and will probably use it as well, since I have many websites, so it would be great if you can also change the header image to something more bright with positive feel about it. Also please get rid off the links to City Attractions/Entertainment as those sections don't exist on the website. @JMN: Thanks for the alterations, looking good! Only I just noticed that you used images for the different header parts, such as "Latest deals", "Featured hotels in Manchester", etc. They look good, but I really need text for that, not sure how that will look, but can you make all header part text, so I can see. Thanks again.
Well, they're not images, actually, it's a font. I will change it to the regular Arial font so you see how it would look in real life.
@sairos: thanks, looks good, no changes neccesary @rakha: thanks, looks very dignified. Not modern or web 2.0, so Im not sure if I will use it, but it looks good.