10 False Flags that Changed the World

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by AGS, Mar 5, 2007.

  1. pingpong123

    pingpong123 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,080
    Likes Received:
    117
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    175
    #41
    Acually iraqis had more security under saddam then they will probably ever have again. If anyone on this earth believed that we went to war in iraq because our government felt sorry for the poor iraqi people they must be seriously dilusional. Iraq was on its way to becoming a regional if not global superpower before the first gulf war. Now there will be security and oil contracts up the whazuuuu.
     
    pingpong123, Mar 6, 2007 IP
  2. d16man

    d16man Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,900
    Likes Received:
    160
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #42
    and because we went to war oil costs have plumeted...boy, you sure have that one figured out...:rolleyes:
     
    d16man, Mar 6, 2007 IP
  3. cupid

    cupid Peon

    Messages:
    284
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #43
    Nothing is going to happen in the middle east in next 20-50 yrs. It would be same old story. Supply of oil will dry up in 20-30 yrs in the Middle East. When Middle East has no more oil, capitalism will look somewhere else for exchange. Middle east will be what is Africa now. Pretty much ignored, and rest of the world will move on.

    I think Iran knows this, and rest of the world including America and Israel have to live with the reality, just like North Korea, Iran would have Nuclear Technology. Iran can be bombed like Lebanon, but it would not bring the desired result. Only put Iran back to 10-20 yrs. Unless you are willing to go in on the ground and do some regime change. You can bomb them, but still the will of the people of Iran will not change.

    Tough taking Current administration, now have to rely on UN for INCREMENTAL SANCTIONS (their hands are tied). This will not work and bombing will not work. You have to get used to the future reality. Some claim Iranians are irrational people like USSR. People are rational when it comes to this sort of stuff. Iran knows, if they act irrationally, whole of Iran would be URANIMUM. Words and ACTIONS are TWO different things.

    Many People say the Iranian president said to wipe off the Israel. He did not say that. There is a different between Zionist Regime and People of Israel. Just like Americans and Neo Cons. Not ALL Americans are NEO CONS. Also, this does not any way implies ALL MUSLIMS are SUICIDE BOMBERS.
     
    cupid, Mar 6, 2007 IP
  4. samantha pia

    samantha pia Prominent Member

    Messages:
    4,639
    Likes Received:
    482
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #44
    ah so you are now saying it was a jet and not a missile that hit the pentagon?
    i'm confused here, because in the other thread you swear blind that it was a missile. now you are sure it was a jumbo jet.:rolleyes:
     
    samantha pia, Mar 6, 2007 IP
  5. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #45
    And as you always seem to only post my quotes if you look at what I said earlier (to lorien I think) and I said that as yet nobody knows exactly what hit the Pentagon because we have not been shown anything conclusive from any cameras.

    Try not to be such a smartass all the time because it makes you look silly.
     
    AGS, Mar 6, 2007 IP
  6. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #46
    I know what hit the pentagon. Most people know what hit. You just fail to look at any evidence that contradicts your point of view. You won't even answer basic questions about your "opinion" to logically justify it.
     
    lorien1973, Mar 6, 2007 IP
  7. samantha pia

    samantha pia Prominent Member

    Messages:
    4,639
    Likes Received:
    482
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #47
    go look in the other thread i did post you a link to the full movie that shows you more then the 5 frames and then a movie on what you could see, in animation, to make it more clear. but you know what?
    you have dug yourself so deep in the "it was an inside job hole" i think you're a miner and cant loose face now without looking a total fool, so the only way you can save face, is by continued support of "the inside job clan"
    so sad yet so true, and thats how they get the weak minded to make them famous or rich. so guess what? you're the sheeple. not us with indpendent though and reason. we look, we apply reason, and we make our judgement, and it happend as seen on tv.
     
    samantha pia, Mar 6, 2007 IP
  8. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #48
    We still have not seen any conclusive evidence that a plane hit the Pentagon.

    And until we do this debate will go around in circles. The real proof that 9/11 was an inside job is WTC7.

    That is what will give your chum Bush away in the end. ;)

    P.S Does GTech tell you what to post here? I think he does. :)
     
    AGS, Mar 6, 2007 IP
  9. charliepage

    charliepage Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    47
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    113
    #49
    Yeah he said "Israel should be wiped off the map", that's pretty straightforward and it's sad a small amount of people insist on defending the nut job.

    As for the rest, if someone said the same thing but said "United States" would that automatically mean all neo-cons should be killed? I don't think so. The muslim and suicide bomber part is obvious and doesn't have to do with his statement.

    If you are going to call for "Israel should be wiped off the map" but mean the government should be changed, perhaps you could say, I don't know, "Israel's government should be changed!" but could of course replace changed with a different word. But that's not what he meant.
     
    charliepage, Mar 6, 2007 IP
  10. latehorn

    latehorn Guest

    Messages:
    4,676
    Likes Received:
    238
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #50
    So what about the eyewitnesses that thought they saw a plane?
    What about all wreckage they found found at Pentagon?
    What about the body parts that they found which had identical DNA records to those at the passengers of flight 77?
    What happened to Flight 77? It was tracked to the Pentagon, but where do you think it went, if not into Pentagon?
    What about the laws of physics that suggest a commercial jetliner hit Pentagon?

    Actually, that's the easiest part to debunk, I've done it a several times, have you actually read anything I've written about this, or do I need to repeat myself?
     
    latehorn, Mar 7, 2007 IP
  11. debunked

    debunked Prominent Member

    Messages:
    7,298
    Likes Received:
    416
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #51
    Don't bother, he doesn't read it and he has shown that his understanding of physics is less than my 6 year old. (I think Gtech nailed it with Road runner physics)
     
    debunked, Mar 7, 2007 IP
  12. d16man

    d16man Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,900
    Likes Received:
    160
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #52
    lmao...debunking him day after day after day after day is actually getting a little tiresome...however, its still funny!
     
    d16man, Mar 7, 2007 IP
  13. latehorn

    latehorn Guest

    Messages:
    4,676
    Likes Received:
    238
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #53
    Well I think that debunking troophers is a good thing. Otherwise, some newcomers may see their posts without answers and think that it's really something in these troopher-claims. Now, when troophers lies are debunked every single time, people will think twice.. hopefully.
     
    latehorn, Mar 7, 2007 IP
  14. d16man

    d16man Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,900
    Likes Received:
    160
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #54
    This is classic....AGS pulled the whole "I can't argue the facts so I will blame it on GTech" routine!!! lmfao!!!
     
    d16man, Mar 7, 2007 IP
  15. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #55
    Yeah. That's pretty much the only point to responding anymore. And even at that; its boring and I think it really feeds into the troofhers narcisistic need for attention.
     
    lorien1973, Mar 7, 2007 IP