Who won the debate? Palin or Biden?

NP gave us more, Four more, which show the exact opposite of what you claim. Going to ignore them and fabricate your own version of reality? yeah, Thought you might. Better get practicing writing an "X", You don't have long left.

 

I fabricated a poll? Biden blew it when he did not know what the vp does.
AP: Palin Wins Debate


Dufus wrote:

Biden is a dufus himself

 

No, You fabricated a version of reality, Like i said, In the words i wrote, Which you failed to understand.

It seems to be a debate tactic of yours lately to intentionally fail to grasp practically everything people say to you.

 

Good lord, the Drudge Report, and now, a source named "dufus?" A gem, from Biz's site:

Yep, hands down, a statistically rigorous, blind study, leading to a thoughtful, informed opinion. Glad Biz hangs his hat on such authority.

 

So the fact that Biden failed to know what the VP does and he chose not to debate Palin instead choosing to just recycle the same catch phrases he has been using attacking McCain you think he won? It sounds like you and the other sheep have a false sense of reality.

NPT, I am disappointed in you. I thought for sure you would send me a green rep for sure for that "dufus" source alone on the humor factor. I have been waiting a while to list that source. Oh well

 

he won because after the debate more people vote for "that one" instead of the old one,

 

What are you talking about now? Have you forgotten the point you were making? Engage your brain.

uploas said "Palin, She is much better than Biden."
You said "Most people share your opinion"

I refuted this point, The point that "most people share that opinion". Get it?

it's bad enough when i have to re-explain my points to you using infantile language, But when i have to explain your own points back to you it's probably time you stopped posting.

 

Out of 500,000 people poled 80% agreed Mr. Russia.

 

Well done on attempting to remember the point you were making, even if you did exaggerate the very same stats you yourself posted.

80% of the readers of a notoriously right wing news source? Shocking

Of course, You are going to ignore the polls posted by NP where a million people were polled and only 40% thought palin won and the 3 other polls where people thought she lost. but then, continuing with your own version of reality would be difficult if you acknowledge that an actual reality exists.

 

Why not? You believe the left wing source. I don't think McCain will win, but if he did, would you still be loving the polls and sources from the left, not quite as far as left as England but left nonetheless.

 

Biz, there's a thing, called the Constitution. It's O.K. - you can actually read it. Biden has, it seems. Palin, well, I think she's still working on a single newspaper, apparently...

 

What left wing sources do i believe? or are you just making up lies again as a replacement for using your brain?

 

Yep, that old damn Fox news - commies. Fuckers had it:

LEFTY PROPAGANDA!!!

 

Quite humoreuos reply. Nice try to slant.
Article I describes the legislature

Article II lays out the executive.


Article II Section 1. The executive power


It's O.K. - you can actually read it NPT.

 

WV turning blue.
Personally, I don't place too much stock in ARG's polling. Seems very odd to me Obama's only up 1 in Minnesota, but up 8 in West Virginia. Regardless, here's their most recent figures:
http://www.pollster.com/blogs/arg_mn_mo_mt_nh_oh_tx_wv.php
lol it is a landslide

 

Undecided yet
Pls be patient...

 

Uh, Biz - you can take a look again at the relevant section from Article 1, detailing the VP's role in THE FREAKING LEGISLATURE, which is the subject at hand, illustrating Palin's wildly inaccurate statement, and your ignorance on the subject. You appear to be lost again. Round 2:

 

You were knocked out in round 1

Mr. Biden, who's been in the Senate for three decades, also mistakenly stated that the executive branch is defined in Article I of the Constitution. In fact,

Article I describes the legislature,
Article II lays out the executive.

Regardless of what you quote he still got it wrong, he stated Article I was executive branch. He was wrong just as you are wrong. Which is usual for you.

 

Biz, I simply, sincerely feel sorry for you. Article 1 describes the legislature, and as Palin was attempting to define an extra-constitutional power with respect to her would-be role as Senate President in the Legislature, Article 1, Section 3 of the Constitution, is the relevant section of the Constitution, Palin simply got it very, very wrong, as have you. It cannot get any plainer than:

Please stop - seriously.