1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Shoemoney says BOTW to buy DMOZ

Discussion in 'Directories' started by Artifexus, Sep 14, 2008.

  1. scoobby

    scoobby Active Member

    Messages:
    1,570
    Likes Received:
    98
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #21
    i simply dont believe it ...
     
    scoobby, Sep 15, 2008 IP
    robjones likes this.
  2. NeuroToxic

    NeuroToxic Banned

    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #22
    Jeremy Shoemaker, of the popular Shoemoney blog, Posted that the owners of Best Of The Web Directory are in talks to buy Dmoz from AOL and that a "deal could be reached fairly soon."

    It is unknown whether a sale would change Google's use of Dmoz for its own directory or would prompt Google to reconsider how much weight it gives the sites linked within Dmoz. For those who don't know, Google is still relatively cozy with Dmoz in that it maintains a Google Directory that is a duplicate copy of the Dmoz content. Dmoz also is still considered a great place for your site to be listed to gain premium Google link power that helps your PageRank.

    Over the last year Google has made it clear they don't like the selling of links from anywhere, especially directories. Google has also made clear that it considers the selling of inclusion in a directory tantamount to selling links. Many directories have experienced a severe lowering of their PageRank that have effectively made links (and inclusion) less valuable to potential buyers.

    Since Dmoz is a free directory with moderators who decide whether a site is included or not, Google still gives their coveted Google juice to sites listed in Dmoz.

    A listing in BOTW.org is not free. It charges a hefty $249.99 review fee which is a prerequisite for Inclusion. BOTW makes the point in bold font that their review for inclusion is not a guarantee of inclusion in their BOTW Submit Terms of Service. Apparently Google believes there is enough editorial value in these reviews because BOTW.org still has good PageRank within its categories.

    However, Google has penalized many other directories that charge for inclusion reviews. Many website owners feel that even the appearance of selling links leads to PageRank reduction. BOTW is an old, established directory with lots of quality listings similar to Yahoo, which also sells inclusion reviews and suffers no repercussions from Google either.
     
    NeuroToxic, Sep 17, 2008 IP
    vegabond likes this.
  3. syted

    syted Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,086
    Likes Received:
    319
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    290
    #23
    syted, Sep 17, 2008 IP
  4. NeuroToxic

    NeuroToxic Banned

    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #24
    Oh damm. :mad: sorry i didn't see that thread. :eek: all that effort for nothing... :eek:
     
    NeuroToxic, Sep 17, 2008 IP
  5. snowbird

    snowbird Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,036
    Likes Received:
    395
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    290
    #25
    Yeah, BOTW would take 999 years to review the pending sites. But that would still be better then the 999 centuries it would take DMOZ. :)

    I'd be surprised if Google did not pick up the directory instead of BOTW. DMOZ is just so huge, and a popular brand, that it would sell for some good money.

    Nice post at Shoe's blog and interesting stuff. Makes great link bait too. :)
     
    snowbird, Sep 17, 2008 IP
  6. mikey1090

    mikey1090 Moderator Staff

    Messages:
    15,869
    Likes Received:
    1,055
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    445
    Digital Goods:
    2
    #26
    Not really. They penalised those selling listing inclusions.
     
    mikey1090, Sep 17, 2008 IP
  7. mysterylinks

    mysterylinks Banned

    Messages:
    316
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #27
    great link bait... chance of this happening..... 1%
     
    mysterylinks, Sep 17, 2008 IP
  8. NeuroToxic

    NeuroToxic Banned

    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #28
    Link bait... :mad: wtf are you going on about? :mad:

    Its a genuine rumor, which i unfortunately didn't know when posting this had already been posted about, so any replies should really be posted in the original thread for this topic... :rolleyes:

    http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=1026596
     
    NeuroToxic, Sep 17, 2008 IP
  9. malcolm1

    malcolm1 Prominent Member

    Messages:
    7,148
    Likes Received:
    758
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #29
    lmao... come on dude

    Do you really think BOTW would even want dmoz?

    For what? so he can make it paid?

    Just my feeling about it and think it link bait

    laterz
    malcolm
     
    malcolm1, Sep 17, 2008 IP
  10. NeuroToxic

    NeuroToxic Banned

    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #30
    Link bait to who? Dmoz? BOTW? AOL? are you serious?, you seriously think that they need link bait to get visitors? :confused:
     
    NeuroToxic, Sep 17, 2008 IP
  11. shaq

    shaq Guest

    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #31
    my reply:
    on top of that, it's so risky biz for botw, given that it's not clear what google's take on future dmoz will be.
     
    shaq, Sep 17, 2008 IP
  12. malcolm1

    malcolm1 Prominent Member

    Messages:
    7,148
    Likes Received:
    758
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #32
    ohhhh my....

    i just caught "bin laden" in my back office looking at porn :eek:

    You believe that ? If so you will believe anything anyone tells ya :p


    laterz
    malcolm
     
    malcolm1, Sep 17, 2008 IP
  13. mysterylinks

    mysterylinks Banned

    Messages:
    316
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #33
    Haha what are you on about?!

    A genuine rumour!?

    Next you will be saying things like military intelligence.....
     
    mysterylinks, Sep 18, 2008 IP
  14. stoner3221

    stoner3221 Notable Member

    Messages:
    865
    Likes Received:
    233
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    285
    #34
    I agree shoemoney has been known to pull some interesting stunts for link bait. This one would be a whopper if that's all it turns out to be. :rolleyes:
     
    stoner3221, Sep 18, 2008 IP
  15. WayneDude

    WayneDude Guest

    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #35
    I have a simple question: AOL is a for profit company, so how do they monetize their involvement in DMOZ?
     
    WayneDude, Sep 19, 2008 IP
  16. NeuroToxic

    NeuroToxic Banned

    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #36
    A very good point that you made Wayne, well AOL only got the ODP directory included when they purchased Netscape, AOL were never after Dmoz, it was just part and parcel of buying Netscape, now AOL haven't really given Dmoz much in way of support since owning it, some quotes of this would be that the ODP is running on second rate hardware in AOL's basement, I for one think that AOL are definitely looking to sale and off load Dmoz at some near point in the future.
     
    NeuroToxic, Sep 19, 2008 IP
  17. Artifexus

    Artifexus Guest

    Best Answers:
    0
    #37
    That's why I think this rumor may have some merit, and thought it was worth repeating.

    Of course, companies talk about buying other companies all the time, and it doesn't always happen. So, even if this deal never happens, it still doesn't mean Shoe was just blowing smoke for links. But, no matter what, it was still linkbait for him...:)
     
    Artifexus, Sep 19, 2008 IP
  18. Kurg

    Kurg Member

    Messages:
    260
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    33
    #38
    The only reason to buy DMOZ is to remove it as competition. Anyone can build a DMOZ but you don't want to try and be seen as THE authority on link directories when DMOZ exists. DMOZ did it first and 1.6 million links is a lot.

    I see this more as a move to gain recognition if it is really happening.
     
    Kurg, Sep 19, 2008 IP
  19. gabbar77

    gabbar77 Peon

    Messages:
    395
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #39
    will this fasten the process of listing sites at DMOZ???
     
    gabbar77, Sep 20, 2008 IP
  20. Scar

    Scar Peon

    Messages:
    439
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #40
    Who cares? DMOZ is dead.
     
    Scar, Sep 20, 2008 IP