Which is better for SEO point of view?

Hello guy's

Which is better for seo point of view PHP or HTML ?

Thanks & Regards
Aryans

 

In on page seo, u need to add description, keywords, meta tags, heading tags so these features are available in html so ofcourse html

 

it does not matter html or php or cgi, all are server generated.
what matters is how you use them.

 

But as i know google always link static pages more then dynamic isn't it?

 

dynamic/static is a different matter, but you can make static pages from html, shtml, php

I always go with static urls where possible, but often use php to make them.

You can even have static php pages show as .html if you want and your server supports it.

 

thanks actually I'm little bit confuse about this can you tell me little bit more about static and dynamic I know about both of them but still need some more information can you?

 

thanks actually I'm little bit confuse about this, can you tell me little bit more about static and dynamic I know about both of them but still need some more information can you?

 

in this post
showthread.php?p=7884030#post7884030 would be dynamic
but if it was showthread7884030.php it would be static

The parts after the ? pass data to the program to show different things to the user, and the more that are after the ? the more some search engines struggle, although most can cope with just a couple of parameters.

 

Got it Thanks for sharing

 

also if you want to read in details so have a look on Sitepoint's Article for Dynamic Site SEO Tips and Hints.

http://www.sitepoint.com/article/dynamic-site-seo-tips-hints

it will give you clear ideas.

Thanks
John

 

Identical, PHP is rendered as HTML.

 

PHP is a language. SE has no prejudice on it.
What the user get in the browser is alwasy HTML.

 

I really don't think it matters. HTML is easier to use but PHP is more flexible and allows you to update pages more easily. Plus PHP and HTML can be used together. There are some easy to use web tutorials for both here:
http://www.w3schools.com/

 

its like vargrant said about dynamic and static URLs.

if your URL sends a million variables to make a dynamic URL like this:
yoursite.com/megavariables.php?a=32432424&b=4843585&c=32743243247&d=4372347347 etc etc

Google peoples have said they would rather see this
yoursite.com/landingpage.php

 

Thanks a lot guys for your such a valuable answer

 

Thanks for link John..,

 

Static pages more useful in on page SEO... So in SEO point of view html is better than php...

 

IMO, it does not matter....

 

That's really good article John thanks for sharing this

 

Both have their pitfalls and virtues. Its how you use them really matters. In terms of an SEO perspective, they are treated fairly equally. Consider this, almost all forums/blogs/discussion boards are made of php, so its quite obvious that they will be given the same value as html. HTML language on the other hand, is the first actual creation for the internet... so its always there!