Psychoanalysis by Freud and Jung has after 80 years been finally declared by Nobel Prize winners Dr. Kandel and Dr. Sperry, by Demagio and the who is who in psychiatry in the USA as the true template of the mind. Therefore, just ignore anyone who says otherwise. So any method based on psychoanalysis theory is valid. I can help you analyze yourself or your friend through a quick drawing test method, I have been doing clinical practice for 20 years. What do I gain, additional experience by analysing your case.
The reason there have been so much doubts is because in the past 80 years experienced psychologist practioners are amazed with the positive results of this method but statistician psychologists who dont have first-hand experience always say it cant be proven statistically. However, the latter conducted trials which did not consider strict scientific "controls", hence the controversy and hence the doubts that you and many others have. However, now that the machines that look into the brain are now available this issue is now put to rest and psychoanalysis is now accepted as the major basis of how we think , behave and feel. So you best believe it
Yet psychiatric drug distribution is at an all time high? Seems to me that most of the people prefer the psychiatrist's approach rather than the psychological principle of psychology. Just an observation. I "best" believe? I believe you mean I "better" believe but I still have doubts as each one of us is an individual who reacts to the same stimuli very differently even under ideal circumstances. Again however, just my observation.
This is complete and utter BS. Absolute and total nonsense. Where did you get your training? One of those comic book offers?
No. I have been a licensed psychologist for more than 30 years and I am in practice full-time. I have taught graduate and undergraduate courses at three universities. This "test" you describe is a variant of the House-Tree-Person test which has been around for decades. There never has been any validity to this test. The test also has nothing to do with psychoanalysis. I don't know exactly what you are trying to scam in this thread but at least be honest enough to admit it's a scam.
Why do you feel someone is scamming so quickly, do you refer to monetary issues? Hmm this is a pretty open system and I suppose one would easily be noticed if indeed financial issues are of a concern. Do you dwell so much on financial matters. I dont. Or maybe you dont refer to financial matters. Is it because of some ghastly influence I may have on someone so innocent. Is that it. There would not be much chance of that specially since all communiques are in the open. I would be honored for your reactions, specially when I am being constantly reminded of credentials. I am sure you are far more superior. But then I am truly more interested in you evaluating my skill about say the simple drawing test I was offering, which you imply you are very versed with since it is so old a variant. I would consider it fun and you might find it entertaining. But of course you may be too serious olr busy or as a scientist you may as you have shown with your comments dont even have time for entertainment so you would not consider my offer. Look I will very likely learn a lesson from you after you take the test. Use all your knowledge to even consciously change the drawings as you wish. C'mon, you wont be dignifying me by sending me your drawings, we'll just have fun and you can berate me as much as you fairly wish after I give you my assessment of based from your drawings. By the way when I say fun I dont mean make fun of anyone I just mean 'hey life is short its always good to interact and be light about things some times". I am sure you are superior at what you do and consider me as just a non-factor , just an entertainer. After all, I dont ask for anything in return. I am sure you have the strongest of basis for your professional opinions and I do humbly disagree with some of your statements, but, dont you think, I could be a fellow who could be interesting as a case study, afterall that's always the focus of psychologists - to study as many minds, Freud had on the average 9 or so sessions per day, wow what intensity for a scientist. No wonder he was famous and produced great works. My sounding pedantic should interest you as a psychologist at least.... you might say, hey , what makes this guy tick.
I have no interest in either "studying" you or educating you. My interest here is to stop you from posting false information and/or scamming anyone. It's abundantly clear that you have no idea what you're talking about.
The test also has nothing to do with psychoanalysis - this statement could be contested specially since both Freuds and Jungs theories are founded on observed correlations between symbology, archetypes, dreams. Machover, Goodenough also observed psyche correlations. Members of American psychiatric associations would comment on such a statement.