Stop loosing 60% of your SEO budgets!

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by rockingram, Feb 8, 2008.

?

Did you achieve your desired rankings in Google for the keyword you want?

Poll closed Aug 26, 2008.
  1. Yes, and i know how rank in Google for any KW.

    2 vote(s)
    100.0%
  2. No, i am trying but don't know why i fail.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. #1
    More than 60% of all the great one-way backlinks that you buy or get manually are not counted by Google. Want to know why is this happening and how to fix the situation? Ok here the truth is revealed!

    For more info on this case go here: www.link-tracker.com IT's FREE
     
    rockingram, Feb 8, 2008 IP
  2. Dan Schulz

    Dan Schulz Peon

    Messages:
    6,032
    Likes Received:
    437
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    What evidence do you have to support your claim?
     
    Dan Schulz, Feb 8, 2008 IP
  3. trueman

    trueman Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    554
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    108
    #3
    i like more information please
     
    trueman, Feb 8, 2008 IP
  4. rockingram

    rockingram Banned

    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Hmm.. evidence you want? Well here's just a quick one:

    1. Go to Yahoo site explorer and check for you back links.
    2. Go to Google webmaster tools and check for you back links.
    3. Compare results. You will be just stunned with them. Difference in links cached by Yahoo and Google will be very great. That means just that Google didn't cache all the pages or the pages may link to the "bad neighbourhood" or the link was "sandboxed".

    Exactly for this is what OMG LinkTracker can do. So you can know EXACTLY what's going on with your old links and ESPECIALLY with new ones. Simply because the new links are that what you are getting to achieve #1 at Google SERPS, right?

    With all that OMG linktracker provide i am #1 for the truely high competitive KWs. For instance i achieved #4 for 5.000.000 term in 2 months for just $100/mo in links simply because i made EVERY SINGLE link work.

    Also OMG linktracker is free to try...


    OMG LinkTracker
     
    rockingram, Feb 8, 2008 IP
  5. astup1didiot

    astup1didiot Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,926
    Likes Received:
    270
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    280
    #5
    [​IMG]
     
    astup1didiot, Feb 8, 2008 IP
  6. Dan Schulz

    Dan Schulz Peon

    Messages:
    6,032
    Likes Received:
    437
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    That doesn't prove a thing. What independent third party research do you have in your possession that can prove your claims?
     
    Dan Schulz, Feb 8, 2008 IP
  7. Dan Schulz

    Dan Schulz Peon

    Messages:
    6,032
    Likes Received:
    437
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    I wouldn't call it spam - just yet. Obvious blatant self promotion and advertising, yes. But not spam.
     
    Dan Schulz, Feb 8, 2008 IP
    bomberman likes this.
  8. astup1didiot

    astup1didiot Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,926
    Likes Received:
    270
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    280
    #8
    Well, this same article is on webmaster-talk and namepros; I would call it spamming :) Wouldn't be surprised if it popped up on sitepoint next. :D Plus, I don't have a self promotion funny picture yet :(
     
    astup1didiot, Feb 8, 2008 IP
  9. Dan Schulz

    Dan Schulz Peon

    Messages:
    6,032
    Likes Received:
    437
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    If it makes it to SitePoint, I personally guarantee it won't be long for this world. :D
     
    Dan Schulz, Feb 8, 2008 IP
    ssandecki likes this.
  10. astup1didiot

    astup1didiot Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,926
    Likes Received:
    270
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    280
    #10
    If someone doesn't beat you to deleting it first :D
     
    astup1didiot, Feb 8, 2008 IP
  11. Dan Schulz

    Dan Schulz Peon

    Messages:
    6,032
    Likes Received:
    437
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    Mentors have no moderator privileges. Only Advisors, Team Leaders, Administrators and SitePoint Staff.
     
    Dan Schulz, Feb 8, 2008 IP
  12. astup1didiot

    astup1didiot Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,926
    Likes Received:
    270
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    280
    #12
    I figured stymiee would be all over that kind of post... the famous <snip> :D
     
    astup1didiot, Feb 8, 2008 IP
  13. rockingram

    rockingram Banned

    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    Are jealous or someting? BTW that's not my product i am just using it oO
     
    rockingram, Feb 8, 2008 IP
  14. astup1didiot

    astup1didiot Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,926
    Likes Received:
    270
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    280
    #14
    What is jelous? This isn't IRC, don't use the "oO" text face ;)
     
    astup1didiot, Feb 8, 2008 IP
  15. rockingram

    rockingram Banned

    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    Hmm... did i stated something wrong about links check cached by yahoo and google? If that's not enough for you.. well you can continue linkbaiting and buying links like crazy with 30% effectivenes... go ahead and tell the stories that ranking in google is HARD. Seems you are one of those "gurus" and "forum gods" that Jonathan Leger was talking about in his report.
     
    rockingram, Feb 8, 2008 IP
  16. bomberman

    bomberman Peon

    Messages:
    1,082
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    Agree with that. Giving the link is just like letting you to force to visit his site.
     
    bomberman, Feb 8, 2008 IP
  17. LinketySplit

    LinketySplit Peon

    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #17
    Interesting hypothesis, if you had more concrete or objective evidence you could provide or publish to support this claim, you might actually have hit on something. It is amazing the amount of "conventional wisdom" that is floating around on the web.. info that, in my opinion, is just plain wrong.

    There is a lot of hype and misinformation around the sandbox effect, "multiple class C IP addresses", again just my opinion - I'm not trying to start a flamewar.
     
    LinketySplit, Feb 8, 2008 IP
  18. angilina

    angilina Notable Member

    Messages:
    7,824
    Likes Received:
    186
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #18
    I think u r right:D
     
    angilina, Feb 8, 2008 IP
  19. rockingram

    rockingram Banned

    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #19
    Well about the "sandbox" effect. The thing is that people use it wrongly.

    Sandbox for link: When you are getting too many links to you site at once and Google cache them fast, then there is a very big chance that google will cache them but not count for months or even years. This was made by google to prevent fast rankings and to prevent webmasters from bombing their competition with lnks.

    So you will loose all your effort for getting those links. OMG linktracker checks you current link quantity, estimates the optimal link placement and caching speed, so every link that cached by google will positively affect your rankings.

    Thanks LinketySplit maybe i will wite a some big report on ranking in Google for people who needs this.
     
    rockingram, Feb 8, 2008 IP
  20. LinketySplit

    LinketySplit Peon

    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #20
    I've been working on a search marketing guide myself.. about to unveil to the webmaster & DP community soon.
     
    LinketySplit, Feb 8, 2008 IP