Stop loosing 60% of your SEO budgets!

More than 60% of all the great one-way backlinks that you buy or get manually are not counted by Google. Want to know why is this happening and how to fix the situation? Ok here the truth is revealed!

For more info on this case go here: www.link-tracker.com IT's FREE

 

What evidence do you have to support your claim?

 

i like more information please

 

Hmm.. evidence you want? Well here's just a quick one:

1. Go to Yahoo site explorer and check for you back links.
2. Go to Google webmaster tools and check for you back links.
3. Compare results. You will be just stunned with them. Difference in links cached by Yahoo and Google will be very great. That means just that Google didn't cache all the pages or the pages may link to the "bad neighbourhood" or the link was "sandboxed".

Exactly for this is what OMG LinkTracker can do. So you can know EXACTLY what's going on with your old links and ESPECIALLY with new ones. Simply because the new links are that what you are getting to achieve #1 at Google SERPS, right?

With all that OMG linktracker provide i am #1 for the truely high competitive KWs. For instance i achieved #4 for 5.000.000 term in 2 months for just $100/mo in links simply because i made EVERY SINGLE link work.

Also OMG linktracker is free to try...


OMG LinkTracker

 

That doesn't prove a thing. What independent third party research do you have in your possession that can prove your claims?

 

I wouldn't call it spam - just yet. Obvious blatant self promotion and advertising, yes. But not spam.

 

Well, this same article is on webmaster-talk and namepros; I would call it spamming Wouldn't be surprised if it popped up on sitepoint next. Plus, I don't have a self promotion funny picture yet

 

If it makes it to SitePoint, I personally guarantee it won't be long for this world.

 

If someone doesn't beat you to deleting it first

 

Mentors have no moderator privileges. Only Advisors, Team Leaders, Administrators and SitePoint Staff.

 

I figured stymiee would be all over that kind of post... the famous <snip>

 

Are jealous or someting? BTW that's not my product i am just using it oO

 

What is jelous? This isn't IRC, don't use the "oO" text face

 

Hmm... did i stated something wrong about links check cached by yahoo and google? If that's not enough for you.. well you can continue linkbaiting and buying links like crazy with 30% effectivenes... go ahead and tell the stories that ranking in google is HARD. Seems you are one of those "gurus" and "forum gods" that Jonathan Leger was talking about in his report.

 

Agree with that. Giving the link is just like letting you to force to visit his site.

 

Interesting hypothesis, if you had more concrete or objective evidence you could provide or publish to support this claim, you might actually have hit on something. It is amazing the amount of "conventional wisdom" that is floating around on the web.. info that, in my opinion, is just plain wrong.

There is a lot of hype and misinformation around the sandbox effect, "multiple class C IP addresses", again just my opinion - I'm not trying to start a flamewar.

 

I think u r right

 

Well about the "sandbox" effect. The thing is that people use it wrongly.

Sandbox for link: When you are getting too many links to you site at once and Google cache them fast, then there is a very big chance that google will cache them but not count for months or even years. This was made by google to prevent fast rankings and to prevent webmasters from bombing their competition with lnks.

So you will loose all your effort for getting those links. OMG linktracker checks you current link quantity, estimates the optimal link placement and caching speed, so every link that cached by google will positively affect your rankings.

Thanks LinketySplit maybe i will wite a some big report on ranking in Google for people who needs this.

 

I've been working on a search marketing guide myself.. about to unveil to the webmaster & DP community soon.