Fresh sites earn more moola?

I've got a theory that dead sites (or sites that don't have fresh content added to them regularly) earn less than sites with regularly added, fresh content. I say this as I went on vacation recently and quit blogging for over a week... income went way down and now that I've started up again, income has gone up.

I'm guessing maybe there is a higher payout for sites with fresh content? Just a thought... anyone else notice this?

 

I think it's definitely a factor from experience.

 

I think maximum webmasters known this issues. Search engines always love fresh content by spidering the web.

 

it's a common knowledge my friend...

but the content is also must be a good quality contents...

since you mention that when you start re-updating your blog than your earning is coming back to you...than i guess you've already done a great job at giving your visitor a good quality contents..

good for you......[thumbsup]

 

Its very difficult to say.

 

Was your traffic the same when you weren't updating?

 

My revenue has stayed relatively even with the traffic trends on my site(s)...

 

Opposite happened for me on my blog last year.

 

Fresh content definintely brings in more money.

Its a fact that older the content, lesser the money.

So you better keep updating your sites often. I would suggest scheduling site updates.

 

i havent ever noticed any difference. of course new content may bring in more traffic, but the cost vs number of clicks doesnt seem to make a difference.

 

yes this true visitor always search for the new

 

Fresh content difinitely good, I have the same last month.