1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

The Google Trademark Enforcement Team

Discussion in 'Legal Issues' started by Johnburk, Nov 3, 2005.

  1. #1
    I have had a domain name for nearly a year and today I got this email. Should I take this sirously and should I charge administration costs for this domain?

    I am a non-us residant.

     
    Johnburk, Nov 3, 2005 IP
    Will.Spencer likes this.
  2. Smyrl

    Smyrl Tomato Republic Staff

    Messages:
    13,740
    Likes Received:
    1,702
    Best Answers:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    510
    #2
    Can't advise but know you are not going to win this one. Make it as inexpensive on yourself as possible.

    Shannon
     
    Smyrl, Nov 3, 2005 IP
  3. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,333
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #3
    If the domain indeed contains Google trademarks (or a derivative thereof), and it was registered after Google registered those trademarks, they will be able to take it from you regardless of what country you live in (or anything else):

    http://www.icann.org/udrp/udrp.htm

    They are not obligated to pay you for "administration fees" either, but I suppose you could ask. :)
     
    digitalpoint, Nov 3, 2005 IP
  4. Johnburk

    Johnburk Peon

    Messages:
    777
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Well it is a .NL domain name.

    The name does contain "google", but the fullname is not trademarkt by google.
     
    Johnburk, Nov 3, 2005 IP
  5. Will.Spencer

    Will.Spencer NetBuilder

    Messages:
    14,789
    Likes Received:
    1,040
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    375
    #5
    They have more money and more lawyers than you, I am guessing.

    The somewhat idiotic courts have been ruling against people in your situation.

    You are not going to win.

    On the other hand, if you have very little to lose, you can make yourself as much of a pain in the butt to these idiots as possible. :D

    I lived in the Netherlands for awhile, in Eindhoven and in Helmond. Dutch people seem to have an enormous social resevoir of common sense and an almost matching sense of tenacity.

    The courts are, IMHO, working against common sense in these rulings. MikeRoweSoft is not Microsoft. PRGoogle is not Google.

    On the other hand, when eBay threatened to sue me, I folded immediately. :eek:

    It all depends on what you have to lose and how willing you are to fight the good fight.

    OK, some anonymous weenie didn't understand my post.

    Here's their anonymous comment:

    The point is that MikeRoweSoft is not Microsoft and PRGoogle is not Google. There is no infringement occurring.

    Those major companies are claiming rights which they do not have, and the courts are allowing it because the big companies can afford to pay the lawyers to make their bullshit seem reasonable.
     
    Will.Spencer, Nov 3, 2005 IP
    TheHoff and MKInfo like this.
  6. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,333
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #6
    I'm not saying it's "good", but technically the (US) law says that anything similar or "confusingly similar" (which of course is pretty vague) falls under trademark protection.
     
    digitalpoint, Nov 3, 2005 IP
    Will.Spencer likes this.
  7. Will.Spencer

    Will.Spencer NetBuilder

    Messages:
    14,789
    Likes Received:
    1,040
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    375
    #7
    Yes. I understand.

    My argument is that "PRGoogle" is not "confusingly similar" to "Google" and that the big companies are only able to claim that it is because they have more lawyers and money.

    We are not in disagreement. :)
     
    Will.Spencer, Nov 3, 2005 IP
  8. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,333
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #8
    Mmmm... I would say PRGoogle is "confusingly similar" to Google. At least in the regard that someone may think it's a Google domain/service being run on it.

    But hey man... I'm not a lawyer, I'm just a code monkey. :)
     
    digitalpoint, Nov 3, 2005 IP
  9. Johnburk

    Johnburk Peon

    Messages:
    777
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    Thanks everyone for the feedback.

    I lookedit up on the internet and found that Google lost a belgium lawsuit for the domain name Googel.be (belgium)

    What is intressting in this is that the domain name I registers (months ago) has not other extention owned by Google. Not .com .be .de or any other I can see.
     
    Johnburk, Nov 4, 2005 IP
  10. JamieC

    JamieC Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    138
    #10
    I'm not aware of the US law on this, but in the UK it would have to be proven that you were 'passing off' to constitute a trademark infringement.

    If you include a clear statement on your website saying that you are not associated with Google, I can't see how any lawyer could successfully argue that you were attempting to pass off.. but then as Will says they can probably afford quite good lawyers ;)
     
    JamieC, Nov 4, 2005 IP
  11. relixx

    relixx Active Member

    Messages:
    946
    Likes Received:
    54
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    70
    #11
    perhaps you should try contact Google and see if the email is genuine?
     
    relixx, Nov 4, 2005 IP
  12. T0PS3O

    T0PS3O Feel Good PLC

    Messages:
    13,219
    Likes Received:
    777
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    They lost the rights in the UK to 'Gmail' so depending on the situation (I agree it being unlikely) you might win...
     
    T0PS3O, Nov 4, 2005 IP
  13. mjewel

    mjewel Prominent Member

    Messages:
    6,693
    Likes Received:
    514
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #13
    Google has a trademark on the name "Google". It doesn't matter if you add words to the name, they own "google" in various classifications and you can't incorporate the word into a domain name. Even mispellings that sound the same can be infringement "MikeRowe" and even foreign spellings i.e. "Water World" vs. "Agua World." The exception would be if you were using the name BEFORE they started using it. It doesn't matter if you post a disclaimer saying you are not associated with "google." Before you use a name, you are responsible for checking to see if there is any prior usage. "Google" is such a unique name that it is going to look like you registered the domain to ride the goodwill of their name. Since they have a Federally Registered trademark, they can seek treble damages (legal fees) if they want.

    At least in the US, if you fight the case, you cannot generally recover legal fees even if you win. A case like this could easily run hundreds of thousands of dollars to defend. I fought a major luxury retailer years ago and we settled before it went to court, but my legal fees exceed $30,000. Unless you are making a lot of money with this domain, I would give up the domain as they are likely to have a solid case (as the "google" spelling part is exact)- but more importantly, (assuming the letter is real) they will proceed with a case against you. It doesn't matter if they haven't registered other extensions of the domain - they have rights to the word "google". When you own a trademark, you have a legal obligation to take action against people who are infringing upon your name (no matter how small they are) to keep from losing your rights to the trademark/service mark. They are under no obligation to pay you anything, but you can always ask.


    The difference in the UK "Gmail" case was that the UK firm started using the "Gmail" name two years BEFORE google launched their service. In this case, he registered the domain years AFTER google had been using it.
     
    mjewel, Nov 4, 2005 IP
  14. Johnburk

    Johnburk Peon

    Messages:
    777
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    Actually I registerd it before google was using it. There is no trademark of the domain itself.
     
    Johnburk, Nov 4, 2005 IP
  15. mjewel

    mjewel Prominent Member

    Messages:
    6,693
    Likes Received:
    514
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #15
    Your post said:

    "I have had a domain name for nearly a year and today I got this email."


    It doesn't matter if the domain name isn't an exact match - there are millions of possible variations of domains that could contain "google". Incorporating the name "google" in any domain name is what is going to be seen as infringement.

    Google's trademark filing dates back to 1998. If you are saying you were using the name prior to 1998, then you should seek legal advice.
     
    mjewel, Nov 4, 2005 IP
  16. Johnburk

    Johnburk Peon

    Messages:
    777
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    @mjewel,

    Thank you for clearing it for me

    The emails was not from Google.

     
    Johnburk, Nov 4, 2005 IP
  17. relixx

    relixx Active Member

    Messages:
    946
    Likes Received:
    54
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    70
    #17
    hey! That's good news! You can relax now :)
     
    relixx, Nov 6, 2005 IP
  18. wizardofx

    wizardofx Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    572
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #18
    No, this means that Google is a big company and that they are
    not good at talking to each other. If you read the original
    e-mail, there is no solicitation, no indication at all that there
    is a scam or spam going on.

    This does give you at tiny bit of clout if they contact you again,
    to say that Google denied that it came from them, but I expect
    that you will soon get a letter in the mail.

    Big companies have many tools to enforce their trademarks,
    one of which is to sue you in multiple venues until they just
    wear you down.

    They have a market capitalization of 100 billion dollars,
    you don't.


    Best regards
    wiz
     
    wizardofx, Nov 7, 2005 IP
  19. Johnburk

    Johnburk Peon

    Messages:
    777
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #19
    I looked at the header and the email was not send by google. I tracked the IP of the email and it was not from a Google server. It is from alldomains.com
     
    Johnburk, Nov 7, 2005 IP
  20. wizardofx

    wizardofx Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    572
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #20
    Can you think of any reason that a spammer would take the
    time to send this e-mail to you?
     
    wizardofx, Nov 8, 2005 IP