1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

MSN link: nice results

Discussion in 'Bing' started by Dominic, Oct 6, 2004.

  1. #1
    Dominic, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  2. NewComputer

    NewComputer Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    68
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    188
    #2
    Looks good to me, so why don't they just use it already... :)
     
    NewComputer, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  3. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #3
    how close do you think msn and yahoo are going to make their algorithms to google. Obviously, links will play a part in them. I dont believe this was the case before with them was it?
     
    lorien1973, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  4. mopacfan

    mopacfan Peon

    Messages:
    3,273
    Likes Received:
    164
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Looks interesting to say the least.
     
    mopacfan, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  5. arestia

    arestia Peon

    Messages:
    89
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    i can definatly tell that they are weighting anchor text a lot cause 3 target keywords for one of my clients are in the top 5 results.

    -Dan
     
    arestia, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  6. Jenny Barclay

    Jenny Barclay Peon

    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    Jenny Barclay, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  7. TwisterMc

    TwisterMc Mac Guru

    Messages:
    972
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    not many blog posts of forum posts showing up towards the top. Maybe they are filtering them out? However, some of my sites returned #1 for terms they are not to be found in the top 20 of google with!! All in all.... I like.
     
    TwisterMc, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  8. fluke

    fluke Guest

    Messages:
    209
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    bleeding hell i wish they'd use it already: all my keywords are at top spot

    why lord why???

    the one area M$ Havn't dominated is the one area i want them too - i'm really getting annoyed now
     
    fluke, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  9. schlottke

    schlottke Peon

    Messages:
    2,185
    Likes Received:
    63
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    Because it requires innovation to be the leader in search ;)
     
    schlottke, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  10. NewComputer

    NewComputer Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    68
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    188
    #10
    Here is my guess... They know all of us are optimizers. We are all prolly posting very well for our terms and they are just mucking with us. They are sitting around, drinking Zima and playing Ping Pong. Then they go back and laugh at all the keyword searches we have done for our sites.

    haha, jerks...
     
    NewComputer, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  11. john_loch

    john_loch Rodent Slayer

    Messages:
    1,294
    Likes Received:
    66
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    138
    #11
    It's nice that anchor text plays such a large role for them.
    Makes life seem all too easy doesn't it ?

    It needs major work if it's going anywhere, and they know it too.

    Just my 2 pence worth :)
     
    john_loch, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  12. Dominic

    Dominic Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,725
    Likes Received:
    121
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #12
    We are seeing great results also. Just a thought - our sites are listed in the msn small business directory - and have been submitted to msn via that site.

    Anyone not in the directory that is still seeing much better than google results?
     
    Dominic, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  13. eddie

    eddie snowrider

    Messages:
    247
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    138
    #13
    I wish they would get on with it I am in the top 3 for many of my keywords.
    Thanks Dominic for that link
     
    eddie, Oct 7, 2004 IP
  14. jarvi

    jarvi Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    127
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    103
    #14
    I have a site that is about 3 weeks old and is appearing at number 4 out of 119 million. Nice if it stays there. Others sites also appear to be in good positions.

    Guess it's kind of silly that we are able to optimise for a SE that technically doesn't exist yet. Is it that we are all that good we can predict how SEs of the future will work? Somehow I think I have to agree with John on this one and accept they have a lot of work to do.
     
    jarvi, Oct 7, 2004 IP
  15. SEbasic

    SEbasic Peon

    Messages:
    6,317
    Likes Received:
    318
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    I just spent the last hour or so playing with that link: command...

    Really interesting stuff.

    It looks like it is listing the results in order of importance (Domain index pages first, then 1 level down, then 2)etc etc...

    Also, if you take the url that is produced... then add
    &first=1&count=100
    Code (markup):
    at the end of it, the number of backlinks jums up a hell of a lot...

    Really nice results though. Makes life a LOT easier IMHO.

    I can't wait 'till longhorn comes out ;)
     
    SEbasic, Oct 7, 2004 IP
  16. GuyFromChicago

    GuyFromChicago Permanent Peon

    Messages:
    6,728
    Likes Received:
    528
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    Yes. I'm in the top 3 for every keyword I'm after for sites that are not listed in the MSN directory.
     
    GuyFromChicago, Oct 7, 2004 IP
  17. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,333
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #17
    I (personally) like the MSN techpreview, because I'm #1 for virtually everything I can think of that I would want to be.

    Unfortunately that probably means it's not doing a good job and relevancy and is easily manipulated.

    When it comes down to it, the more that SEOs "like" a particular search engine's results, the easier it is to manipulate and less relevant it actually is. We love MSN's new search engine, we all like Yahoo and everyone thinks Google is "broken". With Google being the hardest to manipulate. :)
     
    digitalpoint, Oct 7, 2004 IP
  18. chachi

    chachi The other Jason

    Messages:
    1,600
    Likes Received:
    57
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    I wish the thing would load for me so I could see all of my #1 rankings. :)
     
    chachi, Oct 7, 2004 IP
  19. NewComputer

    NewComputer Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    68
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    188
    #19
    It is now down for what I am assuming is either another update of their database or the preparation for the big release.
     
    NewComputer, Oct 7, 2004 IP
  20. dazzlindonna

    dazzlindonna Peon

    Messages:
    553
    Likes Received:
    21
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #20
    That may be very true. However, I'm hoping I at least get a good month or two out of it live and as is, before they decide to redo everything. In most cases, search engines are a bit slow to change. So, if it goes live as is, and they slowly change it, some of us may reap a few rewards before it all goes bust. One can hope... :) (And I don't even have to feel guilty about it, since I didn't do anything beyond normal optimization. Hey, if MSN wants to give me a bunch of #1's for that, even for a little while, I'll take it - guilt-free). ;)
     
    dazzlindonna, Oct 7, 2004 IP