1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Ex-CIA chief slam dunks the miserable failure Bush

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by commandos, Apr 28, 2007.

  1. #1
    With book, TV interview, Tenet takes aim at those who pushed for war in Iraq


    The former CIA chief, better known here as "Mr. Slam Dunk,'' has slammed back at the Miserable Bush administration, saving most of his darts for U.S. Vice-miserable failure : The Dick Cheney.

    But he is also a barometer of how the last days of the Bush administration might play out.

    http://www.thestar.com/News/article/208304
     
    commandos, Apr 28, 2007 IP
  2. d16man

    d16man Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,900
    Likes Received:
    160
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #2
    This from the man that was in charge of getting the right intelligence? Also seems to me that he is promoting his book which means $$$ in his pocket....
     
    d16man, Apr 28, 2007 IP
  3. Edz

    Edz Peon

    Messages:
    1,690
    Likes Received:
    72
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Edz, Apr 28, 2007 IP
  4. d16man

    d16man Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,900
    Likes Received:
    160
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #4
    I'll let Gtech handle the argument for/against WMD's...he is the one that made the post...and yes, they were there, we did find them.
     
    d16man, Apr 28, 2007 IP
  5. Edz

    Edz Peon

    Messages:
    1,690
    Likes Received:
    72
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    Spoken like a true straw man :D
    You may want to carefully read the pages he reference to since it doesn't provide anything solid whatsoever.

    Or better yet read my post that ripped his post you want to cling on to.

    Like mentioned in the thread what GTech thinks is proof is his own deliberate and dishonest misinterpretation.

    If there was actual WMD found, the WMD that your country went to war for don't you think this would be presented by the Bush administration to justify their actions?

    But instead the "Decider" himself clearly indicated there was NO WMD found.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soohikNdbWs

    The whole presentation by Powell was False!
     
    Edz, Apr 28, 2007 IP
  6. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #6
    LMAO you mean that crappy post he wheels out every now and then (like the CIA do with the dodgy Bin Laden videos) that contains loads of muppets saying "yes there were WMDs" even though there was no proof at all of their existence. :D
     
    AGS, Apr 28, 2007 IP
  7. Edz

    Edz Peon

    Messages:
    1,690
    Likes Received:
    72
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    Something to that degree :cool:
    The biggest proof the war has been made on false claims is the unwillingness and lack of interest to show this "proof" to the world with a in your face attitude from the B administration.

    Instead you have Gtech's posting speculation and dubious sources with suggestive statements and claims of Iraqi officials that officially have nothing to say :D

    The war has been commenced in a woefully incompetent manor with no foresight or attempt to have some foresight in this historical event that brings with so much responsibility.

    The whole planning and the execution of the Iraq war WITH the intended goals is to be compared with a boxer going in head first and arms down!

    And that's gonna hurt!
     
    Edz, Apr 28, 2007 IP
  8. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    Actually that post was a nice compliment to the WMD that were found and you were kind enough actually confirm it as noted in the next post in that thread.

    In fact, you were visibly upset when more WMD were discovered in Iraq. Referring them to "grenades!" You were owned then too.

    No doubt AGS gets very upset when his buddies are shown in a bad light. You might say he exerts a great deal of effort to absolve his terrorist buds of their crimes here. That's to be expected though, because he lets alex jones do his thinking for him!

    You miss your bud, saddam, don't you Edz?
     
    GTech, Apr 28, 2007 IP
  9. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #9
    F*cks sake he's posted the link again. :(

    That has to me the most quoted in-house individual thread on the whole of the DP forums. :confused:

    This one has got to be the best from them all, all these muppets GTech has rounded up and quoted and there is still no proof of WMD lol.

    WMD should stand for "War (of) Mass Deception" GTech because that is what it was.
     
    AGS, Apr 28, 2007 IP
  10. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    Yeah, no alex jones in those quotes/evidence ;)

    I really need to do an updated list to include the chlorine attacks earlier this year. I know, you like to protect your buds and shield your friend saddam. A terrorist has no better friend.
     
    GTech, Apr 28, 2007 IP
  11. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    Almost forgot this one, AGS. If you were a defense attorney (not just a lying rambler like alex jones), how would you defend your friend saddam from this list?
     
    GTech, Apr 28, 2007 IP
  12. Edz

    Edz Peon

    Messages:
    1,690
    Likes Received:
    72
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    Only YOU would regard that as a compliment, any sane person would see i do not agree with your findings and strongly made that clear in my post.
    My post merely referenced to your statements based on findings YOU have found and which i CLEARLY questioned and there is no way around that.

    How could this in any logical way be a compliment?

    And as i mentioned before the "grenades" is a term i used since i thought this was the right term to define it by as i am not a native English speaker it's not fair of you and dishonest to try to hold that against me.

    There is nothing i should be upset about because of such a trivial matter, i understand you want to make a big thing out of it and no matter how hard i try to make you understand that it's a language issue and misunderstanding from my part you wish to cling on to this.

    Typical...

    So please stop continuing the lie you bring forward now and then in that thread you referenced to:

    There was nothing deliberate about it.
    It's just in your personality to be dishonest and being a Liar that you are!

    Have a good one! :D
    I redded that due to the fact it is just an attempt to get personal and aids nothing substantial. In matter of fact you make a habit about making these kind of stabs to just about anyone who disagrees or has a opposed view to yours.

    This game i will no longer play with you.
     
    Edz, Apr 28, 2007 IP
  13. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    Indeed, you were visibly upset that more WMD were found. The problem is, in your effort to protect your bud, you actually confirmed their existence.

    Looks like you haven't got over the fact that *some* more WMD have been found. Tissue?
     
    GTech, Apr 28, 2007 IP
  14. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #14
    I sometimes question why GTech goes to such great lengths to defend the massive WMD lie when even his hero Bush admitted there were none.

    I just do not understand GTech, nearly everyone in the world knows that there were none yet GTech clings to the lie like a child would cling to a comfort blanket.
     
    AGS, Apr 28, 2007 IP
  15. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    There's nothing to defend. The links are above that confirm such. It is you and your ilk that have to defend saddam. While I have documented my position, you have nothing more than "but, but, but everyone knows." Willfull ignorance is your specialty.

    alex jones would be proud of you! More importantly, saddam is truly blessed with misinformation specialists like yourself. Viva saddam!
     
    GTech, Apr 28, 2007 IP
  16. Edz

    Edz Peon

    Messages:
    1,690
    Likes Received:
    72
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    Visibly upset?

    Clearly you are suffering from delusion.
    In Gtech's case.

    Criteria:
    1: [​IMG]
    2: [​IMG]
    3: [​IMG]

    It's evidently clear you're an delusional liar.
     
    Edz, Apr 28, 2007 IP
  17. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #17
    Thanks, I often quote AGS as having delusional disorder.

    Here are some more delusions for you!

    Poor Mr. Edz! A liar's liar and can't help his bud saddam out by proving his WMD didn't exist! I love to watch you get upset when you can't defend your friends :D
     
    GTech, Apr 28, 2007 IP
  18. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #18
    AGS, Apr 28, 2007 IP
  19. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #19
    You've done nothing but defend saddam. Some of us were around when you were doing so after he was hung.

    Yep, these WMD probably didn't exist either, eh?

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/13/AR2005081300530.html

    Keep up the lie, AGS. That's what you do best.
     
    GTech, Apr 28, 2007 IP
  20. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #20
    Here's some more WMD that didn't exist, AGS! Can you issue a fresh lie for these? You know, just to honor saddam posthumusly with some fresh denial?

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,124576,00.html
    Gee, I wonder why terrorists (oops, I mean those nice head chopping freedom fighters) would want to bid on chemical WMD that didn't exist?

    Doh!
     
    GTech, Apr 28, 2007 IP