Google "gives head" to premium domains

That's another in a long line of your lame excuses.

 

You are way more like Bush than you realize, apparently.

What you should have done, if you are at all sincere in any way shape or form about what you purport to believe, is when you were caught in a lie, apologized for lying, and moved on. Instead, like some damn brainless Republican, you think the better action is to continue to lie, that somehow, if you never admit to the lying then you can somehow convince yourself you were being honest.

Whatever man. Karma will get you eventually.

-Michael

 

ok.. enough with your fight.. larry page heard you all and decided to removed americanbabytoys.com on their SERP.

 

Google does not parse concatonated urls for ranking purposes. Instead of using the domain americanbabytoys.com they could have used any random collection of letters, like gadfgsdhrrewhbnm.com and got the same result.

- Michael

 

Just emailed them:

Let's see if they feel one way or the other about it.

-Michael

 

Michael. Note that experiment proves nothing in regards to the TLD domain. Google sees a huge HUGE difference between www.domain.com and www.domain.com/some-bullshit-file.html

Two different things mate. The guy did not conduct the experiment based on domains he did it based on file names, order of keywords and dashes and underscores.

Here is some more proof:
G will yield different results for the following:
"baby american toys"
http://www.google.com/search?source...GGL,GGGL:2006-22,GGGL:en&q=baby+american+toys

"toys american baby"
http://www.google.com/search?num=10...6-22,GGGL:en&q=toys+american+baby&btnG=Search

"american toys baby"
http://www.google.com/search?num=10...6-22,GGGL:en&q=american+toys+baby&btnG=Search

Google is a bit smarter than that. It knows that the natural way of search would be "american baby toys" not "toys american baby" or "baby toys american"

 

Credit with anchor is given to the original site as well as it is a review. How is that stealing? The internet is made of links to other sites.

 

Thanks!!! Just got your email!

 

Are you now claiming to own plinko.com, where I sent the email?

-Michael

 

Dude you are like a fucking flea. Get off my back!!!

 

Excuse me, but you just thanked me for sending you an email. Did you get an email from me?

I didn't come onto the forums making a complete bullshit claim.

To quote Andrew Clark: Okay, fine, but I didn't dump my purse out on the couch and invite everyone into my problems.

You did. You were looking to spam people under the guise of asking for feedback. So, you plagiaristic fraud, you got it.

I ask you again, are you claiming to be the owner of plinko.com?

-Michael

 

Is that confirmation that you stole content (pictures - intellectual property) from http://www.babybushtoys.com/ ?

 

Eat shit. Rollover and die. I will ignore you 2 from this point on.

 

I'll take that a yes

 

Well, not only that, but with this statement:

He also is engaging in fraud, isn't he? Pretending to be someone he isn't for personal gain? I mean, how much identity do you have to steal online for it to be official Identity Theft?

-Michael

 

Why don't you go back to your roots you filthy pig!
http://www.14thc.com/mvandemar.html

 

So, in your eyes, there is something wrong with the adult entertainment industry, and those who work in it are, in your opinion, "filthy pigs"?

You're the only liberal on the plant opposed to free speech, but plagiarism and fraud are A-Ok in your book, is that it?

And Sweets... you couldn't ignore me if you tried.

-Michael

 

I'm -almost- willing to chalk that reply up to thinking he was replying to something else, but the attitude shown in the last part of this thread doesn't really give me lots of good will here.

identity theft (I've been a victim of that) is a tad serious to be throwing around like that. i don't think replying to a thread post reaches it.

Definitely thread of the day though. But, sadly, it is still only #2 on guru-seo's all time classics.

 

Out of sheer curiosity , Whats #1 ?

 

by popular demand

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=101989