1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

sounds bad for co-op

Discussion in 'Co-op Advertising Network' started by getsum80, Aug 18, 2005.

  1. fryman

    fryman Kiss my rep

    Messages:
    9,604
    Likes Received:
    777
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    370
    #21
    Static links... people whining about red rep... people saying that they got banned by Adsense and didn't do anything to deserve it... yeah, things are just the same as when you left ;)
     
    fryman, Aug 18, 2005 IP
  2. john_loch

    john_loch Rodent Slayer

    Messages:
    1,294
    Likes Received:
    66
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    138
    #22
    Static Links - sounds a little like link-vault. I think facilitating same as an option for co-opers will at least allow them to make up their own minds.. (for those of us who don't want assumtions made on their behalf ?)

    I suspect a number of folk would like to consolidate their linking endeavours, rather than having to split between different providers. Some time ago mention was made of the possibility that new programs (like link-vault) might encounter capacity issues, such as down-time, intermittant service etc. I believe that's exctly what's been happening lately, they're (LV) outgrowing their meagre resources :)

    DP has bucket loads of grunt - I think static links as an option would be great. To me it seems a logical progression.. irrespective of who gets penalized for what :)

    Cheers,

    JL
     
    john_loch, Aug 18, 2005 IP
  3. Julia-IT-Inventors

    Julia-IT-Inventors Active Member

    Messages:
    369
    Likes Received:
    22
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #23
    but it also means that all sites with Adsense will be penalized?
     
    Julia-IT-Inventors, Aug 19, 2005 IP
  4. GuyFromChicago

    GuyFromChicago Permanent Peon

    Messages:
    6,728
    Likes Received:
    528
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #24
    Adsense links aren't followed...they're in JS.
     
    GuyFromChicago, Aug 19, 2005 IP
  5. wendydettmer

    wendydettmer Peon

    Messages:
    1,462
    Likes Received:
    70
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #25
    good to know i didn't miss much, except webjunkie being banned :D
     
    wendydettmer, Aug 19, 2005 IP
  6. joeychgo

    joeychgo Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,368
    Likes Received:
    321
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    255
    #26
    Folks, everything google puts into its patents are not included in the algo.
     
    joeychgo, Aug 19, 2005 IP
  7. fryman

    fryman Kiss my rep

    Messages:
    9,604
    Likes Received:
    777
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    370
    #27
    Oh, and were you around when Buttman made his entrance?

    That was fun :rolleyes:
     
    fryman, Aug 19, 2005 IP
  8. wendydettmer

    wendydettmer Peon

    Messages:
    1,462
    Likes Received:
    70
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #28
    nope, missed that one too lol
     
    wendydettmer, Aug 19, 2005 IP
    yfs1 likes this.
  9. getsum80

    getsum80 Peon

    Messages:
    342
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #29
    so is shoemoney full of BS ?
     
    getsum80, Aug 19, 2005 IP
  10. Googles76

    Googles76 Peon

    Messages:
    664
    Likes Received:
    26
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #30
    Why is that. He is simply stating what he heard at the conference. Also read:

     
    Googles76, Aug 19, 2005 IP
  11. Homer

    Homer Spirit Walker

    Messages:
    2,396
    Likes Received:
    150
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #31
    Geez, don't shoot the messenger :rolleyes:. Why is Shoemoney constantly getting bashed when offering some sound advice and opinions?
     
    Homer, Aug 19, 2005 IP
    joeychgo and yfs1 like this.
  12. skattabrain

    skattabrain Peon

    Messages:
    628
    Likes Received:
    18
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #32
    what i don't understand is ...

    someone makes a point about something like dynamic links are bad news ... the only arguments is "well that can't be right because the top 1% of all web sites would be screwed."

    that is such a lame argument.

    here we are trying to boost our affliates sites that no one would go without a little seo and many compare that to cnn.

    apples and oranges
     
    skattabrain, Aug 20, 2005 IP
  13. amaze

    amaze Active Member

    Messages:
    594
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #33
    amaze, Aug 21, 2005 IP
  14. joeychgo

    joeychgo Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,368
    Likes Received:
    321
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    255
    #34

    Agreed.

    :)
     
    joeychgo, Aug 21, 2005 IP
  15. Infiniterb

    Infiniterb Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,314
    Likes Received:
    50
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    168
    #35
    Well, it's the way people are wording it. Sites that are being linked to via a rotating backlink aren't being penalized, but that specific link is being devalued in the Google algo (or so the patents say). However, CNN and the like don't just remove the links since most stories have an archive or perm page which would likely include any and all links.
     
    Infiniterb, Aug 21, 2005 IP
  16. visioninfotech

    visioninfotech Banned

    Messages:
    739
    Likes Received:
    33
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #36
    In my opinion.
    Google has two main goals now.

    First Comes >> Make more people buy adwords to get traffic and don't let people do SEO easily and get into better rankings.
    Second comes >> Provide better results to web users.
     
    visioninfotech, Aug 22, 2005 IP
  17. Shoemoney

    Shoemoney $

    Messages:
    4,474
    Likes Received:
    588
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    295
    #37
    Yes it is in the patent but who knows if it will be implemented. The last guy who spoke said specifically that this is what google wants publically displayed.
     
    Shoemoney, Aug 22, 2005 IP
  18. skattabrain

    skattabrain Peon

    Messages:
    628
    Likes Received:
    18
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #38
    i agree with this statement. it's all about the money and what makes it flow better ... the highest priority now is keeping share holders happy ... and they are doing that.
     
    skattabrain, Aug 22, 2005 IP
  19. Homer

    Homer Spirit Walker

    Messages:
    2,396
    Likes Received:
    150
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #39
    It is also seems as though ststic links are sandboxed. I have had good bls in place since March 2005. I am not SEEING them at all using link: command. As far as rotating links I am NOT seeing any serious penalties either.

    Shoemoney I think your choice of words is key here 'what google wants publically displayed'. So they want you to think that. Like many other Google secrets eg. PR internal and external are different. It just seems to me that Google is slowly trying to take SEO of of action :confused:.


    PS I enjoy your post Shoemoney...pay no attention to those that criticize you, they just don't get the game ;).
     
    Homer, Aug 22, 2005 IP
  20. skattabrain

    skattabrain Peon

    Messages:
    628
    Likes Received:
    18
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #40
    maybe having links sandboxed is a good thing afterall ... sooner or later they will be to your benefit, as opposed to blinking links that *may* never be of benefit.

    i wonder how much energy google is putting calculating this.
     
    skattabrain, Aug 22, 2005 IP