Please review - www.instanttraffics.com

Hi guys

Please review my new site

> https://www.instanttraffics.com/

Hope will get good response here

Best Regards

 

Many of your background color choices -- like that middling blue on the later sections -- are outside the accessible "Window" in that neither white or black text fits into WCAG minimums. Your constant shifting of colour and font-size further compromises legibility and usability for many users -- no matter how many marketing scam artists seem to LOVE pulling that stunt, and the same can be said of the ever shifting font faces. The line divider below the page top hero/splash conflicts with the angled background and looks more like a rendering error than intentional design, and the layout seems utterly banjaxed for me on my 1rem == 24px or higher machines.

For a simple squeeze page it's painful to try and navigation, and much of that seems to stem from this broken gibberish "everything's either a paragraph or span", leaving the page completely devoid of structural semantics. That large sections of what SHOULD be text in the page is instead loaded via images certainly isn't doing you any favors on accessibility either. In fact, the lack of a H1 and the only numbered heading on the page being the copyright notice in the footer means whoever wrote the page's copy needs to learn how to write for the web. (or in general)

Popping the bonnet to look at the code, it's a complete shit-show of developer incompetence. Static <style> in the markup, static style="" in the markup, endless pointless DIV, SPAN and classes for nothing, again the lack of anything resembling semantic markup (a sick euphemism for "using HTML properly")... it's hardly a shock it's blowing 200k of HTML on 4.6k of plaintext and not even two dozen content images -- not even 12k of HTML's flipping job!

As evidenced by idiotic nitwit TRASH like this: (formatting added)

<div size="3" class="sc-jMMfwr epKMaI">
	<div class="sc-kkbgRg hgzVfn">
		<div id="image-162423f6" class="sc-eKZiaR jmMcVn">
			<picture style="display:block; position:relative; height:0; overflow:visible; padding-bottom:95.23809523809524%">
				<img
					loading="lazy"
					src="https://d1yei2z3i6k35z.cloudfront.net/systeme-common/6077e65a504b8_FireShotCapture3452-systeme.io-squeeze-page-v01-xd.adobe.com.png"
					class="sc-likbZx fXdDOl"
				>
			</picture>
		</div>
	</div>
	<div class="sc-kkbgRg bFrHYX">
		<div id="text-f91d6307" font-size="16" font-family="Poppins" class="sc-gPWkxV eZavbi">
			<div>
				<p>
					<strong>Big &amp; New Traffic Source</strong>
				</p>
			</div>
		</div>
		</div>
		<div class="sc-kkbgRg ctGQzq">
			<div id="text-0c6b29e8" font-size="16" font-family="Poppins" class="sc-gPWkxV eZavbi">
				<div>
					<p>
						Over 2 billions views every day, Learn how to create &amp; deliver your ads to billions audience
					</p>
				</div>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>

Code (markup):

BS attributes that don't even exist in HTML like "size", "font-size", "font-family", etc, etc, endless pointless classes, div, and ID for nothing, presentational image in the markup, DIV+STRONG doing H3's job... It's a bloated wreck doing the job of:

<div class="infoCards">
	<section>
		<h3>Big & New Traffic Source</h3>
		<p>
			Over 2 billions views every day, Learn how to create &amp; deliver your ads to billions audience
		</p>
	</section>

Code (markup):

Whoever wrote that HTML or whatever "tool" was used to build the page is utter and total garbage, and deserves to be stabbed, disemboweled, drawn and quartered, and burned at the stake. Them maybe piss on the ashes for good measure.

Only further exacerbated by the ridiculous presence of 647k of JavaScript in 5 files on a site I don't even see anything warranting the presence of scripting, alongside 357k of CSS in a half dozen files leaving one wondering what the blazes you're pissing CSS all over the markup for... when any competently built website has no business having more than 48k of CSS in two files per media target.

The lack of media targets for all of the styles not helping there either.

At easily ten times or more the code needed to do the job, a complete lack of anything resembling proper semantics, several dozen separate files doing the job of a half dozen or less, your page is a wreck from an accessibility, usability and SEO standpoint. I would suggest pitching the entire mess in the trash and getting someone competent to build a website involved.

NOT that the intent of the site -- an obvious web marketing scam -- is worth saving. It's obviously a scam from all the glittering generalities, and outright bullshit bingo it mindlessly parrots and repeats like all outdated and outmoded propaganda. Anyone qualified to promote websites -- the audience for your site -- would/should instantly recognize the early '00's style marketspeak doubletalk and black-hat BS.