Iran kills another of it's own nuclear scientists

Iran has killed off another of it's own nuclear scientists by attaching a bomb to his car. Call it stupidity or blind hate. What can Iranian leadership be thinking? What good can it do the Iranian people to stir up tensions with Israel and the US. Killing off their own scientists like this has to be setting their nuclear program back. Morons.

While Iran busily blames the US for it's murder, and threatens to shut down the straits of Hormuz, and sentences an Iranian-American to death on groundless charges of spying, US Naval vessels operating in the Hormuz(where Iran threatened us not to go), have saved the lives of Iranian sailors for the second time in one week.

This comes on the heels of the US rescuing another group of Iranians being held by Somali pirates in the same waters, just one week ago.

In a show of gratitude, Iran's president Ahmadinejad visited his buddy Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez this week where he joked about sending a big atomic bomb at Washington. Quite a knee slapper.

 

Your post is really stupid. Why do Iranian should kill their own scientists? Do you really believe your own nonsense?

 

Obviously they are doing it so they can blame the US and Israel. Did you not read the Iranian statement where they did just that? It certainly couldn't be any outsider. Do you remember when the three American hikers were kidnapped by Iran for even getting close to the border?

 

More nonsense to hide the fact that USA supports terrorism when Israel or CIA is behind it. Terrorism is generally bad unless is done by us seems to be the motto of USA.

 

Actually, the attacks are being directed at military targets, which falls outside the definition of terrorism. Assuming for a moment the US or Israel were behind these attacks, which they are not, it would still not be terrorism. Given that the attacks were carried out at the order of the Iranian regime, I would definitely call them murder.

 

Nice try OP. But we all we know its Israeli terrorists who were behind this.

 

You have a point here. They keep on deceiving people. What a shame.

 

Are you saying that scientists in a country that you are not officially in war with are military targets? Are you going to say the same thing if Chinese or Russians start killing American scientists by car bombs? I suppose someone like you who posts such BS doesn´t need to employ any logic or common sense ion his postings.

 

Chalk another one up for the Mossad......But then again Israel does have the right to defend itself.

 

Officially at war? By that definition, every tomahawk cruise missile we sent into Libya recently was an act of terrorism. You do realize we haven't declared war on a country since WWII, right?

As you can see by the rescued Iranian sailors, the US is engaged in purely humanitarian efforts.

 

Such as the upcoming oil embargoes that are going to kill hundreds if not thousands of Iranian children.

 

The embargo will drive prices of commodoties up inside Iran.But with Turkey and Pakistan sharing it's borders,no one will starve inside Iran.The big beneficiaries here will be the Iranian trucking industry and domestic producers.Some Iranians will profit bigtime from this.....not all gloom and doom.

 

Hello Mikael

The sad truth is, this is "War" , when "man" can not compromise and treat each other with respect than comes death to the very young , defenceless, weak , sick and old. Nothing has changed in a million years and nothing will be changed.

Respectfully
David Jackson


ps Anyway Have a Good One

 

The sanctions on Iraq lead to the starvation of thousands of children, this is no different, thousands of Iranian women and children will die, not that you care or anything but yeah.

Why should these children die? What have they done? You said this is a "war" , what war?

 

So true. The money from the oil for food program that was meant to prevent the deaths of those children just ended up going to the secret bank accounts of Saddam and his sadistic offspring. We should never have sanctioned Iraq, but rather just invaded in the first place. I'm with you man.

 

All the situation is getting more and more difficult. I believe that war will start soon over that region.

 

In reality some of the biggest winners of Iraq oil sanctions were different Republicans who were buying Iraq oil at cheap prices.

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/leopold.php

 

Not sure how you arrived at the idea they were Republicans, but they were definitely oil men. Of course the biggest winner was, as I pointed out, Saddam, followed closely by France. US oil traders were part of the raft of other people from other nations who made out.

Glad to see you feel invasion was the preferable alternative. Is that your advice for Iran as well? Even Mikael the Wahabi Islamist agrees Ahmadinejad will just pass the punishment directly on to the Iranian people.

 

The oil for food scandal didn't start until 1996, the sanctions had killed thousands of women and children by then.

Why did there have to be an invasion? Because Saddam invaded oil rich Kuwait? I don't think that's a good enough excuse.

 

You mean Saddam had killed thousands by then, by means of his greed. Oh, and by nerve gas if you were unfortunate enough to be a Kurd.

But you probably don't think we should have helped Kuwait either... after all, in your words, invasion is not a good enough excuse.

The rest of the world thought differently, including KSA who based the world's troops. Not completing the task and removing Saddam from power in 1991 was a large mistake, one which Colin Powell will take with him to the grave.

Removing Saddam from power then would have:

• Saved the lives of those who died at Saddams hands post war, either by nerve gas or by starvation
• Saved the lives of those who died from sectarian violence following the 2001 invasion
• saved the lives of those who who died from Islamist insurgents in the decade that followed.

Powell made the decision because he didn't want to deal with the cost and logistics of rebuilding Iraq, something we ended up doing anyway. Bush Sr. made the decision because he thought a speedy end to the conflict would assure him a second term.

Romney wont make the same mistake with Iran.