Need help in choosing best facebook app for building custom tab

Discussion in 'Facebook' started by martin grace, Dec 21, 2011.

  1. #1
    Guys, really need your advice here. I've been going back and forth with searching for a good application in order to build a tab with custom content on Facebook. I've ended up with these 4 apps on my list. I've also summed up all their pros and cons, as well as prices and would like to hear your opinion.

    1. iWipa application.

    I've built my test page and found almost a half of the page being occupied by a menu, rotating line and share-this-page stuff. Obviously, these elements all together make the page loading time much slower. To tell the truth, I lost myself few times before I built a simple page. I wish this interface was more friendly and could differentiate primary and secondary options to a user.

    Pros

    WYSIWYG text editor and custom HTML area
    Fan and Non-fan gating
    Google Analytics
    Appearance management

    Cons

    Too busy and overloaded admin interface
    Broken links happen sometimes
    Most of the options require payments
    Uniform layout for all the pages

    Pricing

    Free Level
    PRO Level: $9.97/mo & $99,97/yr

    Summary: Too overloaded and busy for a regular user. Paying a free will give you quite good tool to build a tab for Facebook page. I wish the developers could fix the interface and make it more intuitive and friendly.

    2. Lujure application is rather new but quite popular tool. This application provides Like Gate, layout templates, and other useful features.
    In editor each box is edited in a separate popup block. Boxes can be dragged and dropped. There is a measuring rulers that help you to organize the design. Cool! But I've found some weak sides.

    Pros

    Very fast interface
    Free plan offers decent number of features
    Drag-and-drop management
    Community support forum

    Cons

    Building process is not 100% intuitive (some actions require to hit Done/OK twice)
    Too expensive in case you want to use its advanced features
    Requires basic graphic application knowledge to customize the images

    Pricing

    Free - for 1 pages with Lujure branding
    Consultant - $30/mo
    Business - $300/mo

    Summary: Lujure is really great for beginners, and users with medium HTML knowledge. Consultant and Business plans seem to be a bit expensive in comparison to other apps. Despite its price, Lujure is a great alternative to build custom iframe tab for your Facebook page.

    3. iFrame Tab Plus application developed by HostFB team. It is relatively new yet promising application that offers tool for building welcome/landing pages as well as mini-site pages for Facebook. By the way, they have some other free facebook apps in their collection.

    You can easily create a Welcome page by uploading a banner or build a mini-site with sub-tabs. Load text or custom HTML code easily into Fan and Non-fan area. iFrame Tab plus allows you to customize the overall appearance of your custom page via color picker tool or via a set of 8 color schemes. I personally find these pre-made color sets well-balanced and organic. Now, let me return to the point.

    Pros

    Easy & fast in usage
    Edit-on-click management
    Image library tool
    Unlimited image hosting
    Color schemes choice and color picker tool
    24/7 email support
    Community support forum

    Cons

    Would be great to have pre-made layouts

    Pricing

    FREE Trial - 14 days
    Pro - $1.99/mo or $19.99/yr

    Summary: Very handy and easy-to-use tool. It worth paying $1.99 a month! A nice and decent alternative to Lujure and PageModo builders.

    4. Static FBML application. Though the title of the application doesn't really fit current situation on Facebook (because of FMBL stuff being deprecated), this app allows you to build iframe tab using custom HTML code. Obviously, you need to be a programmer or webmaster to create the code first.

    It took me few minutes to play around with the app and understand how it works.

    Pros

    Recognizes HTML/CSS/Java Script and highlights the tags
    Is good for pre-made coded templates

    Cons

    Doesn't host images, styles, media files (you'll need to host supplementary files at your place)
    Requires HTML/CSS knowledge

    Pricing: FREE

    So, here I am, having 4 apps on one hand. Would like to hear your thoughts on this matter. Appreciate response.
     
    martin grace, Dec 21, 2011 IP
  2. FPForum

    FPForum Notable Member

    Messages:
    4,172
    Likes Received:
    102
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    225
    Digital Goods:
    2
    #2
    Static iFrame is the best one in my opinion.
     
    FPForum, Dec 21, 2011 IP
  3. 3dPrinting

    3dPrinting Peon

    Messages:
    894
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Forget all of that and as my bud above says, Static iFrame is the best.

    FBML will be obsolete in January 2012
     
    3dPrinting, Dec 21, 2011 IP
  4. kensmith

    kensmith Peon

    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Guys, Static HTML will not work for regular users cause it requires html knowledge. If you want a professional looking tab, then you need use an app with text editor and pre-made templates. I really liked iFrame Tab Plus for the ability to play around with color templates and my own pictures, although for affordable price. It's just $2 a mo.
     
    kensmith, Dec 23, 2011 IP
  5. martin grace

    martin grace Peon

    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    martin grace, Jan 3, 2012 IP
  6. DevSwift

    DevSwift Peon

    Messages:
    103
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    I'd recommend static HTML - it's free, even celebs use it.
     
    DevSwift, Jan 3, 2012 IP
  7. V4VoDKa

    V4VoDKa Peon

    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    iFrame tried and tested
     
    V4VoDKa, Jan 8, 2012 IP