F I N A L F A N T A S Y . N E T

Probably the best related domain possible not owned by Square Enix. Registered in 2000. Has been redirecting the entire time. After removing the redirect, forum was added just last week. Already ranking numbers 2-3 in MSN for the popular franchise name.. getting 550 uniques a day and rising rapidly. How much would it be worth?

 

high xxx my guess

 

are you kidding

OVT without extension is an amazing 13,148.6 /day

 

no im not kidding, you asked the question and i gave u my answer...

 

High xxx can be achieved in a single day, if the site was ever to be developed and the full ranking potential of the domain was realised. I'm not asking for an appraisal of the current forum or even the current traffic.

 

Im not quite sure how much but I definatly know you will have tons of people wanting it. Great domain inho.

 

Ooh that's a nice one, definetely a keeper and a domain worth developing.
Probably mid-low XX.XXX the only disadvantage that I can see is the potential trademark problems

 

definitely xx,xxx

 

I also agree, $xx,xxx easily. mid-high even.

 

low to mid $xx,xxx easily

 

Agree with everyone else. low to mid $xx,xxx.

If I were going to take the plunge on this I'd need some kind of assurance I don't get screwed on the trademark/copyright issue.

 

Mid to high $X,XXX due to trademark issues.

 

4/5 digits, easy.

 

Becausse of the posible (perhaps obvious) trademark violations I would say less than the WIPO fee of $1500.

/askhoej

 

maybe he is kidding and just low $xx or just registration cost due to risk of legal problems

 

I would also have to say a couple hundred because of the trademark issues. You can say that it has been registered since 2000 and you havn't had any problems but as you have stated you just had it redirected. I think if you actually developed a final fantasy site around it you would run into problems with trademark issues. I could be wrong but just my opinion.... So High XXX

 

xx,xxx imo.

 

Getting screwed on the trademark issue sure is a possibility. I would have probably made the same comment. If a potential buyer offered low-mid xx,xxx and wanted some sort of assurance to protect at least part of the investment, what kind of assurance could be given... any suggestions?

Without drasticly reducing the price based on this possibility, is there any reasonable arrangement possible?

 

lock monies from sale with a third party and for 1 year let buyer do what he wishes. or lease for 1 year with intent to purchase. if no trademark after 1 year money is yours.

 

the sites not opening