What’s Better; A Gay President or a Woman President?

If you had to choose one or the other, who would you choose?

After all, they both like shopping, men, cleanliness, and beautiful places.

Since there are so many similarities between a gay man and a woman, I just wondered who would have a better pulse on how to run America? Who would truly do a better job and why?

 

I dunno. If you had to choose between a labrador retriever and a pteradactyl, which would you choose?

After all, they both eat meat, hate cats, and like to smell things.

Since there are so many similarities between a labrador retriever and a pteradactyl, I wonder who would have a better pulse on how to run America? Who would truly do a better job and why?

Presumably, you have a problem with either a woman or a gay man being president, for reasons, as best as I can tell, that they both share certain enjoyments in your mind.

This thread is Nogga Nogga.

 

Why are you so concerned about the sex life of someone?

How about choosing people based on their actual qualifications and past performance?

 

I think sex has something to do with it. Lets take gun control or abortion rights for instance. Would a gay man care about abortion rights?

 

And that is all we know about them?

Or do they have actual identities outside of their gender and sexual preferences?

 

He might, or he might not. Would a straight man categorically care about anything?

Doug, you seem to have a HUGE charge on homosexuality, and I've never been able to understand why it is such a subject for your public outpourings. Care to elaborate why someone's sex life is this important to you?

I mean this sincerely. I'm straight, and admit I find effeminate gay men, or bulldog gay women, disconcerting, for example; but I also believe this is just my shortcoming, my idiocy - so long as they are not doing anything to me, why should I give a damn? I'm curious why you do, and why you do to such an extent, as evidenced on this forum?

 

I am sure if we sat around a gay geo-political table we would not hear men piping up against gay marriage. I don't think a modern gay president would fight against that issue. So yes, sexual preference does imply some basic elements of political stances.

 

If you read my threads or my cartoons than you know everyone is game including white Christian males with low IQs.

I have a hangup on everything,

 

Can I chose a gay woman president ?

 

HA- funny!

And that's a big issue for many non-gays for some reason.

Gay marriage is the very least of my concerns.

I would only take that into consideration after looking at their stances on the 1,000's of more important issues.

 

After comparing it to rape and having sex with children doug had this to say about gays:

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=881071&postcount=19


Why not make the choice easy and have a gay woman president?

 

It is odd for one to have hangups about one's self.

 

Defo a gay president, and a really pro-gay one at that. The more active gay men the better. Women will get starved for sex and much easier to get for those left over like me. Bring on the gay president!

 

And why do you think the president gets to make law? He/she could be pro bestiality and it wouldn't mean that bestiality will be legal tomorrow.

Same thing with abortion.

 

Bestiality isn't legal? Uh Oh.

 

It would depend on which man and which women, if it was the gay Reagan vs. Hilary Clinton it would be gay Reagan no doubt about it.

 

I think presidents do have a lot of power. Look at the complaints we hear about Iraq and Bush. Would a gay man or Woman have invaded Iraq?

 

Dude, open your eyes. The puppet at the fore-front hardly makes any decisions of significant importance.

 

But, but, he's..... the decider! Everyone knows Bush decides what's best for our country!

 

Your probably right. My wife turns my neck!