Would you pay for automated Social Bookmarking submissions services?

Hello all,

I have come across lots of services that offer automated social bookmarking submission services. A few of them have been used by my friends and they say it works and they have had no problems.

I can't bring myself to use them, I don't know why.

Would you use them?

Thanks for any insight.

 

For me, I don't go for automated submissions because manual submission is still the best! Probably for those people who does not know how to use social bookmarking sites will really engage with that kind of service. Good thing I have little knowledge in SEO.

 

The only way I would go with automated is with software that I can configure myself. I would prefer to "drip" my bookmarks at my own chosen pace rather than letting someone else do it. For all you know, they could blast out 1000 bookmarks in a day and say it took them 2 weeks. Also, I like to keep a list of places I've added my link. That way I know what isn't getting indexed, which sites to not bother with again, and which sites are doing the best for me.

 

i dont know how automated submission work but i do only manual social bookmarking that is the best to do

 

Can and do... but I pay a little extra so they set up unique accounts for me.
Time is money. The "Secret" if there is one is to do it slowly and consistently and combine it with other methods.
Don't expect to buy 1,000 bookmarks and not leave some kind of footprint.

 

Are you talking about like onlywire? I've used them and didn't get much results, i'd be interested in what other kind of auto submission sites are out there though.

 

i think its really only onlywire.com , its the best anyways

 

I care about that service.

When there are many works to do and I can handle all I think about hiring someone else doing such works for me.

How much are you willing to pay for this service? For each month or for each submission.

 

Anything automated is with regards to search engine marketing is worthless. Either they lack authenticity or pages and sites submitted using them will be eventually banned. Not worthwhile....

 

Well I like to do it manual

 

Interesting responses. I am getting mixed message though, some say they use it and would consider it and others say they never touch the stuff! Hmm, this really is a dilemma for me!

I can see it will be a time saver but then there are things that could go wrong if its not a quality automated service!

 

Automated doesn't look good unless you can drip feed it in slowly. It looks more natural. Just stick with manual submission it will be better in the long run

 

If you want something done right, you have to do it yourself. With that said, if it came with a money back guarantee, I would try it out if the presentation was good, and I trusted the guarantee.

 

There are only a handful of social bookmarking sites that are worth anything anyway. Just submit by hand to 4 or 5 of the best ones!

 

Tend to agree. Cannot see how an automated system is going to produce anything convincing in terms of content. Even some of the manual SEO's I have used produced crap!

 

Hi there,

Except for paying...I just have some Social Submitting Wordpress Plugin.I made an account with all the websites like 3 years ago.And now,all I do is click a button and my post is sent to more than 30+ Social Sites.



Simu

 

That makes sense.

 

Automated social bookmarking software are not good for me.. I rather use my own hands to do it manually.. So that I can get Organic traffic and avoid Google sandboxing!

 

You can also use Social Marker if you are on a tight budget...It's
semi automated and it's free.

Mix it in with some of your manual submissions..

There are automated submissions that work...They are rather expensive if
you aren't making a lot of sales.