Science Vs Religion

never heard of a sky daddy sorry.

and yeah i will accept science that can be tested viewed and proven, big bang thoery and evolution cant be, so i mean there good theories, but they cant be proven as fact as there is BIG gaps that are simply filled in.

how about Nebraska man? a whole cave man (family and way of living) drawn from a tooth that was later found out to be a pigs tooth.

i dont get how u can think its science vs religion


there is christian doctors, muslim doctors, hindu doctors.

so your complete logic makes no sense

there is times in history when Religous leaders contributed to mass killings and there has been times when atheist leaders contributed to mass killings (hitler, stalin ex) its how people are

 

The drawing of Nebraska man was done by a magazine illustartor and criticised widely by palentologists at the time as being "a figment of the artists imagination". Of course, if you had looked into it instead of blindly parroting shit you heard on some creationst website you'd have known that, but then again, you are religious, doing as you are told is about the limit of your capacity.

 

LOL ya by creationist.

 

Possibly, they aren't known for their intellectual honesty.

 

so when are we going to actually get into this debate im kinda bored tonight

new thread?