1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Do Canonical URLs affect page rank?

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by walrusy, Jan 19, 2010.

  1. #1
    I have a question hopefully you can help me out with.

    I am doing the SEO for a new site that is in development. Some of the pages are individuals profile pages with unique URLs. When an individual creates a profile on our site - one of the key pieces of information for that we will be optimizing in the search engines is their location. Their location will also be included as a keyword in their URL.

    For a small minority of inviduals profile pages - the location will change over time so that will have to reflected in the URL. The rest of the content on the page will remain the same.

    So we want to use canonical URLs to avoid losing the pagerank built up for individual pages.

    My question is....if we use canonical urls will the page rank be affected?
     
    walrusy, Jan 19, 2010 IP
  2. Camay123

    Camay123 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,423
    Likes Received:
    86
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    160
    #2
    to avoid lossing page rank, you should use a 301 redirect form old url to new url.
     
    Camay123, Jan 19, 2010 IP
  3. segzeey

    segzeey Active Member

    Messages:
    350
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    78
    #3
    You should use a redirect to the new url.
     
    segzeey, Jan 19, 2010 IP
  4. walrusy

    walrusy Guest

    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Ok guys - thanks for yoru responses. It seems 301 redirect is the way to go to avoid losing pagerank.
     
    walrusy, Jan 19, 2010 IP
  5. walrusy

    walrusy Guest

    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    Ok how about this instead of using a 301 redirect - use a unique identifier at the end of the url eg:

    website.com/location1/firstname.lastname/xxxxxxx

    lets say they change their location :

    website.com/location2/firstname.lastname/xxxxxxx

    The information in the middle of url would change based on changes on the page content - but the unique identifier would remain the same.

    Will this work do you think?

    Thanks
     
    walrusy, Jan 19, 2010 IP
  6. Canonical

    Canonical Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,223
    Likes Received:
    141
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #6
    website.com/location1/firstname.lastname/xxxxxxx and website.com/location2/firstname.lastname/xxxxxxx are two different URLs, so Google and the other engines are going to treat them as 2 different web pages in their index. This isn't even really a a URL canonicalization issue... The page has actually permanently moved so you need to 301 redirect the old URL to the new URL.

    If website.com/location1/firstname.lastname/xxxxxxx has 100 external backlinks and the person changes locations and their new URL is website.com/location2/firstname.lastname/xxxxxxx, if you don't 301 redirect their old URL to the new URL then the old URL will STILL have 100 external inbound links, their new URL will have none and will be starting from scratch trying to rank.

    The search engines don't look ONLY at the xxxxxxx portion of the URL... the look at the whole URL. If any portion of the URL changes (http to https, website.com to www.website.com, location1 to location2, firstname to newfirstname or lastname to new lastname, or xxxxxx to yyyyyyy... if ANYTHING changes in the URL, it's treated as a different page.

    So either take the location out of the URL OR when a user changes location and subsequently, their URL... then 301 redirect their old URL to the new URL.
     
    Canonical, Jan 19, 2010 IP
    Jim4767 likes this.
  7. redesignunit

    redesignunit Peon

    Messages:
    467
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    Some time it would be effected
     
    redesignunit, Jan 19, 2010 IP