Hi! Here is my simple perspective framework (Any constructive criticism?): -------><------- -------> ( Your Scatternet: Now "Wifi Direct" )( The Control Group )( Your Website - Any Domain ) <------- | <------- lynx 4.6 Billion Mobile Subscriptions (2009) -------> | Have a Special Day, Pumice
Not gonna lie, I didn't quite understand how your post refers to net neutrality, but yes there will be "one internet" That's the aim of Windows 8 when it's released some time (hopefully) in late 2011. The platforms on desktops and mobile devices will be the SAME, and with the advent of HTML5 this seems very doable in the short term and will open the door for cloud computing. If this is the case, one can see how viciously privacy and neutrality would either have to be protected as never before lest others (government/isp/other users) find a way to hack the central servers and mess things up. The model, even with Wi-Fi hotspots and such, relies on a powerful central system...This is so archaic, I have no idea why we aren't working on making every single device communicate directly with other devices and act as Wi-Fi hotspots on their own. We need decentralized union, not one big system to distribute services to all of us; charging what they want, and denying service when they please.
I am still learning about some of the terms you mentioned We're on the same vibe here: I do believe each mobile/desktop (object) should be its own ip.. - I know, its scary.. In synergy, I now fathom that's the final context for tomorrow of both socialist and capitalist concerns towards "Net Neutrality" today.. ------- Here is an excerpt from Wikipedia on the latest technology called "Wifi Direct": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiFi_Direct [Sounds like something in the spirit of Quantum Computers Reality]
Do a Wikipedia search on your own username; I do think that is how the future will be (if it's going to be efficient). You have two or more bluetooth devices communicating with each other directly. The only problem is that our current systems have to designate a master or slave device in order to, as they say, "synchronize." (read: maintain outdated technologies and standards). It can work by the master of one network also acting as the slave of another; I just think there needs to be a new hierarchy system where it can be both at the same time...I have no idea how to do that...Time to study!