DMOZ Corruption according to Google

Would you feel better if they listed some of your affiliate ladden, non-2257 compliant, teen and prostitution sites?

 

Why not! You are listing everyone else's.

 

I don't need it, otherwise I would have excepted the bribe offers in the form of the listings when nobody knew that I was also an editor.

I am glad to see that you are having "fun" playing the puppet and hope that the reward is worth it.

Not everyone, you almost need to be editall or above to arrange hundreds of deep links for your affiliate sites.

 

gworld a pornmaster ? sidjf you are smart but not yet that smart...looking in wrong direction.

 

Gworld does own teen porn sites

 

It is nearly 06 months since I submitted my Travel blog but, not listed yet.

 

yes im sure dmoz is a bit of corrupt, but its still important for webmasters at the moment, and therefore i will still care to be listed on it

 

Better to invest your time in Google Co-Op.

I did.

Now my annotations are included in the Main Directory! It was very much worth it.

If you do a good, honest job of your annotations, there is a good future in it.

 

Really ?

 

And you "know" this how?

 

Does this make any difference in the amount of corruption in DMOZ?

Some how the other editors disappear when I ask this question, may be you like to answer it, how many porn sites are owned by Meta are listed in DMOZ and how many deep links those sites have?

Why a Meta "recommends" to editors in internal forum to list illegal sites that don't have 2257 declaration? Is this part of DMOZ declaration about social responsibility to encourage the involvement of minors in porn?

 

It goes to credibility.

 

And the excesses of that Adult Meta are different? At least her connections are verified, not innuendo.

 

Blah blah blah. Gworld none of the editors disappeared when you posted. You waited to post after the editors left. I saw you in this forum when I posted above, you left, and when I come back I see you posted a response. Don't waste your time lying.

Since you are a editor and have been one before me, why don't you tell me? Obviously you don't know or you would have revealed so by now since you like to tell the public twisted stories about what "allegedly" goes on in the internal forums.

Gworld three things

1. I don't edit in adult or even see what you claim, so you're wasting your time trying to use what happenned in the past, in a minor part of dmoz that is not even on the front page towards me to justify your rants about Dmoz because you can't get one of your porn sites listed

2. Gworld where is this great rampage corruption some whinny people slander Dmoz about? Sorry, examples of a small number of listings is not going to convince me over when I see millions of quality listings. Now before anyone tries to twist my words I didn't say there were no such thing as a corrupt editor, but until you can prove me wrong I'll say such a number of corrupted editors is very small.

3. Gworld funny you try to make yourself appear to be the poster-boy for social responsibility when you have site about slutty teens

I guess its even more funny that other people is willing to risk their business reputation online by going along with your phony cause without any real proof, it makes them look like liars

 

*sigh*

How long is it before high school starts up again in your area, crossman?

 

DMOZ editors only work once every year

 

But they have to sign in three times a year. They must be exhausted just trying to remember the password after 3-4 months.

 

Just open your eyes (or, "I could tell you if I wanted to...I just don't want to...").

 

I didn't think you were that naive, sid...

 

No, but sometimes it helps to be reminded that we are talking to someone who is dealing from the bottom of the deck.