Hello, My site is old but not sure what's wrong. www.wallpapermenu.com Not indexed in google, yahoo etc. I shall be very thankful to you if you check what's wrong? Thanks
well, please check the google webmaster tools, to se what do they say about your site. Otherwise, why do you have only your main page in the sitemap.xml? Add a robots.txt to your site and tell the crawlers to index and follow. Google shows only 4 links to your site, maybe try to add a couple..
Even sitemap maker isn's working. I mean obviously something wrong but what? I have a .htaccess file but not sure what my programmer did to make seo friendly urls.
Where are you getting links from, if banned sites link to you, or sites that have a low value in Google's eyes, like link farms, then it's no surprise that your site doesn't show in Google results.
If it has been 1 year passed away and your site is not indexed by google it means your site is banned by google
We had a problem with a site once - each page was indexed, we then added some software for submenus and all the pages dropped out of the serps 1 by 1 as the way the software was written stopped Google from being able to follow the internal links. We changed our software and the pages started reappearing in the serps.
Your site IS indexed at Google... You have 247 pages in Google's index... It's indexed WITHOUT the www. Your site is ALSO indexed at Yahoo! You have 244 pages indexed at Yahoo! again WITHOUT the www (however, your home page is actually indexed w/ the www but it's the only one). I can't believe 6 people responded to this post and NONE took the time to even check whether or not the site was actually indexed. Wild guessing and supposition doesn't really help posters here. It only adds to the confusion. /cry
As a side note... You have canonical issues that if not corrected will eventually lead to duplicate content issues and split page rank/link juice... Hopefully this will help understand what I am talking about and how to correct: Google and the other engines rank URLs. They don't rank sites... they don't even rank web pages. Every unique URL is considered by the search engines to be a different 'page' in their index. Most sites out there not professionally SEO'd have canonical issues because they are not aware of this fact. And half of the so called SEOs out there don't even understand it. Every 'page' on your site should have one and ONLY one URL. This is called the canonical URL or preferred URL. For example, http://example.com/ http://example.com/index.html http://www.example.com/ http://www.example.com/index.html might all be URLs for your home page. Google and the other engines see these as 4 different 'pages' because each has a different URL. This leads to a couple of problems that affect your rankings for particular keyword phrases - 1) duplicate content and 2) split page rank/link juice. It leads to duplicate content because your site serves up the exact same content (your home page) under all 4 URLs. So one of the 4 URLs (you have no way of knowing which) gets flagged as the original version of the content and the other 3 get flagged as duplicate. For the 3 duplicate versions of the home page, all ranking factors that are based on the content of the page are devalued in the ranking algorithm. Since Google sees them as 4 different pages, if they each have 10 inbound links from 10 different sites then what you have is 4 URLs with 10 inbound links each. The way to fix this is to decide on some rules of how to determine which URL is the canonical or preferred URL. This usually means making decisions like: - www vs non-www - show trailing '/' when referencing folders w/ default documents or hide the trailing '/' - show default document filename when referencing folders w/ default documents or hide the default document name - if you support https as well then which pages should be https and which should be http (don't allow a single page to get indexed as both) It doesn't matter which rules you decide on for constructing canonical URLs as long as you decide on the rules and enforce them across your site w/ 301 redirects. I always choose www, show trailing '/', and hide default document name. So my preferred canonical URL in the above example would be http://www.example.com/ but that is just my preference. To fix the canonical issues you simply redirect all other non-canonical URLs to the canonical URL similar to the following: http://example.com/ --> 301 redirect --> http://www.example.com/ http://example.com/index.html --> 301 redirect --> http://www.example.com/ http://www.example.com/ Canonical URL No Redirect Required http://www.example.com/index.html --> 301 redirect --> http://www.example.com/ Now Google will give your canonical URL credit for all inbound links to the other 3 URLs as well as giving it credit for the link text used to link to the other 3 non-canonical URLs. This means the PR will be passed from the other 3 non-canonical URLs to the canonical. The redirects also cause the other 3 non-canonical URLs to drop out of the index. So now Google sees your home page http://www.example.com/ as a single URL with 40 inbound links instead of 4 different URLs with 10 links each. This eliminates duplicate content issues on your site and split page rank. Your home page will gain some PR because it's getting credit for 4 times as many inbound links and hopefully because of the additional links w/ relevant link text it will rank better for the terms other sites are using in the links. It now has 4 times as many link texts to be considered for keyword rankings in the SERPs and 4 times as many potentially relevant refering pages to be considered.
@Canonical: Google representatives had recently said that domain.tld/ and domain.tld/index.html (or php) are treated same if they have same content. Your other observations are correct. @OP: Your site is indexed. Why do you say it's not indexed?
Yea I know Google is pretty good about figuring it out. Matt even said so a while back that they could. But other less intelligent search engines like Yahoo!, MSN, Ask, and the 100s of other wannabies won't be able to do it necessarily.
i gone throgh your site but i would say you have a dynamic pages with FULL OF wallpapers. There is not even little contents as well. I suggest you to add aroung 150-200 words for each page.For instance you have a car section that shows only car picture. Now when the search engines trying to visit your site they fist look for contents first and then others.So you need to add bit of contents to your site. You have enough info from other END. So adding 200 words in every section and subsection then i am very sure that you site will be indexed very soon AND will boost your ranking in the search engines.. Because i created a blog which is all about fee jobs WITH full of affiliate link and most of them copied contets and none of them in ranked high. But indexed all. But now i have another blog about adsense with my own articles for beginners which is very new like 1 WEEK old but it is ranked first page in the fourth place. So here contents first and then others. Apart from that you site is very neat and easy to navigate and good looking as well. So why can't you try as i mentioned above. Did you sumbit you site map to google? O.k add little content in each section with keywords. i LEARNED THIS FROM OTHER SOURCE....
your site is indexed in google!!!! what your problem is, your not ranking, which means you should look at your onpage seo, things to look at Your descriptions are not descriptive enough for google, you have no content on your home page or any other page for that matter. Your backlinks! you may have 1680 according to yahoo, but a fair few of these sites dont even open therefore making your links unusable. Get some high quality links and do some really good onsite seo, ps. you have too many meta keywords in the code
Well thanks to all of you. I have added a robots.txt file and will add content soon too. I have about 10,000 wallpapers. Not sure maybe js file is restricting search engines to crawl. But all in all thanks to everyone.