Kaspersky Antivirus Vs Symantec Antivirus

Anybody tell me which is more better?If anybody say Kaspersky why? If anybody say symantec why? Give me some reason about it.

 

I think we cannot compare one to another both guards works if they have update files but I have experienced Kaspersky get less resources comparing with symantec.

 

If you had to choose - Kaspersky.

Why? Because it's much less resource hungry than Norton.

However, if I had an option I would choose NOD32!

 

i choose kaspersky too . it better than norton

 

kaspersky gets my vote too..Norton is no no no as it will make your core2 duo laptop work like a P2

 

norton 2005 is the best one that i m using i have full version . ihave used kaspersky but cant understand it...remeber norton have 4 options
1.removal virus
2.quarantine
3.delete
4.exclude

 

my number one is kaspersky.

 

Been using kaspersky for a while now. Served me well.

I'm familiar with avast, avg and bitdefender. I must say kaspersky top them all in term of stability and virus detection.

 

Symantec is a complete joke, I dont even know how any1 can compare these.
Kaspersky is in the top 5 avs going

And Prometheus, Can you send me the link to your avater in full size?
Thanks

 

Vote for Kaspersky.

 

Kaspersky is way better. Norton takes control of your system and when you try to uninstall it, lookout!

Anti-Nortonite

 

I do preference to Kaspersky.it provide comprehensive and maximum spyware protection.Kaspersky anti virus 2009 is ever best with his best features.

 

I only use Kaspersky ....

 

Norton is a resource hog, Kaspersky is better among the two.

 

I haven't been able to use both before but many are saying that Kaspersky is the best.

 

Hang them both and use Avast!

 

From my personal experience I can tell that Kaspersky Antivirus and Symantec Antivirus both are resource intensive antivirus. Though you close the program it continues scanning all the time. Continuous scanning makes all the program work slow. And if you are using any software using crack or patch you will be a lot of virus notifications.

 

both hav great virus def.
i hav used both. Symentecc slows ur pc down a bit. but not as much as people hype, at least in my case
i hav used NAV 2005. its simply great. but one annoying aspect is that Norton would download about 30 mb for each update. i dont know why! if u hav slow connection it would annoy u.
but still if u want me to choose i would choose NAV 2005

 

I agree with aniroy1986, I also don't like big updates. But I really think that now a days we need antispyware program more than antivirus prorgram.

Spyware are more dangerous than virus. Because spyware steals your valuable information and send it to a third party which is more venerable than virus. Don't you think so?

 

hands down..it is kaspersky..