You betcha."wink" why do you insist on defending everything that the old man does, even when he is clearly wrong and ineffective. Dont you pugs wish you had a smart candidate like Obama. Don't you feel sad that you are stuck with these two losers.
That would make Obama a loser then, because his campaign treasurer (of all the campaign staff, no less) has tax liens as well. Obama ought to know better than to employ someone who can't even pay their own taxes, to be his treasurer. Republicans...held to higher standards, as usual
He is a loser also. The point is that mccain wants to pass this loser as joe America. Joe america pays his taxes.
I agree with you that Obama is a loser. Lots of people cannot pay their taxes, for whatever reason. The only "crime" Joe made, was asking a legitimate question. Not like liberals do. Liberals make accusations and then called on it, dishonestly try to hide behind the guise of "just asking questions." Joe, actually asked a legitimate question. And just like the Obama camp tried to do in Mississippi by attempting to silence and quell legitimate discourse, they immediate (along with help from their surrogate MSM allies), set out to rip Joe to shreds. That sort of fascist behavior is what we can continue to expect under Obama.
joe is not the problem. Mccain is. He is the one that want to represent joe's alter ego as a legitimate middle class American. If he has a point why can't he exemplify an actual middle class working person that makes 250k/yr.
250k per year is not "average American." McCain isn't at fault for anything. Obama and the media took the low road, McCain took the high road, as usual. Joe is a hard working guy, not unlike many other Americans. He asked a legitimate question and Obama finally exposed his socialist agenda of taking from the rich and "spreading the wealth" to the poor. And for asking that legitimate question, the left has attempted to "smear" him as usual.
And to the fine individual that provided the sterling commentary via rednote... Thank you for providing a prime example of the tone that makes these forums such a wasteland. Heaven forbid we rise above the scatological level of discourse so popular in Junior High.
Love to help you narrow the field of potential contributors of that note... but I don't have that kinda time. If it helps I'd guess it's limited to people that read your posts (as a general rule I don't, as I've had you on ignore for weeks, tho I did open a few in this thread). I wouldn't rule out people on the same side of the argument though, far as I can tell some of them seem to hold that view. Guess the difference is one of us is trying to tone down the namecalling and the other is doing it in every post. Anyway, best of luck on your search.
Man, all I got was a green How I long for the old days when liberals where not running behind the skirts of moderators to silence those they disagree with. I'd give anything to go back and start ripping some ass! BTW, thanks Rob! Gotta catch up myself
I would call Obama under qualified and a liar not a loser. His ideology is dangerous and disgusting, and his views, are a disgrace to our nation.
I love the choices. "More of the same" as Obama calls it or "something far worse" The voting criteria should be changed. If you do not pay taxes ,you should not be allowed to vote. People on welfare just looking for a handout are only going to vote for someone that promises socialism or communism. Vote for far worse in 08.
If you're going to do that then there should be a test for minimum knolwedge of the issues as well as IQ. So all the tarts that I know in real life couldn't vote for mccain because they "ain't gonna vote for that muslim" or because they think the bible says to vote republican.(that must be in the new testament, btw, because I don't think the party is quite that old) Seriously, I know people like this. There are a lot of good reasons to vote for McCain, but all the idiots I know don't seem to know anything about those good reasons.
True enough, but I'm also almost positive a presidential candidate doesn't take advice from him either.
I'm here. And as far as I know, the only staffer I've ever PMed here has no skirt. Or at least he better not have! Unfortunately I don't think I could dial up the name calling too much more and get away with it myself. So what you see if what you get. I also try to stay out of silly threads like Joe the gimmick. But lately I can't help myself