Obama's 'Terrorist' Connection according to the New York Times

so maybe you can explain to us how is this important
and enjoy this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMegXF5UJW8

 

Thanks for proving what I have been saying.

 

You were trying to prove that Obama and Ayers leave in the same neighborhood? Relevance?

 

That they were more than just neighbors.

 

Wait so because they lived in the same the neighborhood, they were more than just neighbors? uh Logic?

 

Are you handicapped? For Real?


Two boards, Get together at Ayers house prove they were more than "just neighbors".

 

I'll post again just for fun, it is correct that they are more than just neighbors.
The connection is:

- They live in the same neighborhood in Chicago.
- They were both appointed to the same two boards.
- A 3rd party had Ayers hold an event at his residence in Obama's honor.

No more, no less.
These points should not be belittled or exaggerated.

 

So more than just neighbors means they were co-workers on different boards. If thats what your getting at than just say it. Because even Obama stated that, and everyone knows that.


edit


Just say your point. You keep stating the same thing:

They worked on different two boards together.
They were neighbors.

They were more than "just neighbors."

What are you getting at? really? That they worked together? Because so did a dozen others. That he hosted a Meet and Greet so everyone can meet Obama? This was all stated by Obama.

Do mean because all of this Obama is a terrorist or connect to a terrorist. If so then I will make a topic about all of McCain's associations.

And to add at the bottom, Do you think Ayers is still a terrorist? If yes, list all the recent terrorist activities he has participate in with your sources.

 

Xphic - good points, but don't expect them to receive consideration. That would require an appreciation for "reality."

NYT - Posted above, in its entirety. Whole lotta nothing.

CNN - same. Whole lotta nothing.

Washington Post - whole lotta nothing.

AP: Whole lotta nothing.

One could wake up to reality, of course. But it's so much better to cower in a corner, and cry out "OBAMA!" in abject terror. In the words of David Frum, former Bush speechwriter:

 

The man should have received the death penalty just like McVeigh. He also stated he had no regret and should have done more.

 

You know that quote is a distortion right?

From Ayers:

"I said I had a thousand regrets, but no regrets for opposing the war with every ounce of my strength."

Thanks for posting this northpointaiki, I see there's no point in wasting my time here.

 

Finally someone that agrees. Thank You.

 

so what? there are almost no one that agrees with you

 

They do. It is like talking to rocks.

 

Hit the nail on the head right there

 

The mainstream media is now starting to talk about Palin's involvement in the Alaska Independence Party. CNN ran a story today on it. The McCain camp sent a letter asking them not to run it.

 

It's already been covered by ABC:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/09/members-of-frin.html

 

According to a new article today, it goes a lot (whole lot) deeper:

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YTQ0YjhlOGVhYjQ0OWRhZjI2MmM4NTQ4NGM5Mjg0MzU

The relationship with an unrepentant terrorist goes far deeper than someone who "just lived in the neighborhood." As I've said before though, the fact that Obama has a close relationship with a domestic terrorist is probably a good reason why the far left would vote for him.

If a republican had launched his political career in the home of an abortion-clinic terrorist, he wouldn't even made it to the nomination. But this sort of thing is expected from liberal democrats.

 

Obviously I missed where the connection went a lot deeper? I see some stuff about Rev Wright... I see something about Obama funding some type of Afrocream? I mean if by 'funded' you mean the board he was on with Ayers gave money to, then I would say I'm spot on.

I don't see how this goes deeper than what i said. In fact, it almost seems as if this shows less of a connection to Ayers than what i said.

 

Here's the CNN interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2AiQ5ShYSU

They reference this video where Palin addresses the AIP earlier this year: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBHjUiKCtI4

She was not a member but her husband was, although according to the interviewee, he was not very active.