You say you support the second, yet you allow an anti gun candidate to get your vote. Horrible? according to his record. He's out right anti gun! I didnt see an argument worth disputing Yeah and until then (never), you will continue to give your votes to people like Nobama that want to strip your freedoms. Making your vote worthless. By your own admission "the two main parties will win every time". Grim Grim Grim, talk about avoiding something. I said if you had no other choice, yet you go with an option that wasn't listed. Nobama said and i quote: "When I am President, we will wage the war that has to be won, with a comprehensive strategy with five elements: getting out of Iraq and on to the right battlefield in Afghanistan and Pakistan," Obama told the foreign policy establishment. No, McCain is actually out there protecting my right. What are you doing? Allowing the anti - gun demos, a chance at ripping it away. Seriously, im not sure what your referring to, admittedly i have a hard time keeping up with so much nonsense. But if you will re post which bit of nonsense you would like me to address i would be glad to do so. Otherwise i dont know what to tell you. My intentions are the same as your signature, pizzamans, and all the other anti-americans
Would you stop lying? Ron Paul is not 'anti gun' He is not for 'taking all your guns' like you claimed. Both are horrible on the 2nd. More like an argument you couldn't dispute. My vote is not going to Obama, really very childish of you to keep saying 'Nobama' Both sides are for stripping freedoms FYI. The two main parties will continue to win as long as people think short sighted like you are doing, people are willing to sell their principles out like you are doing. I'm avoiding nothing, if I had no other choice I would not vote. I think BOTH SUCK what is so hard to understand about that? Yes, it says nothing about 'attacking Pakistan' you can be on the right battlefield with cooperation from the government of that country. You are being totally disingenuous, I have shown beyond a shadow of the doubt that McCain is far from 'protecting your right' I am further more not 'allowing a anti - gun demo' a chance of ripping it away. I unlike you will not water down my stances and support a pathetic fool, putting on the blinders to the reality of which is McCain is rated pretty piss poor on the 2nd. BTW thanks for also showing yourself to be a flat out hypocrite. Not owning a gun does not matter in some cases, yet in my case, where I support the 2nd much further than McCain it does matter. What awesome logic you have there. How do you keep up with what you type?
she wants to rip a star out of the Flag. It seems that you are the Anti American for supporting the she-chaney. she sleeps with the enemy.
We both know who im referring to, and due to the fact Ron cant win, Your vote is taken out of the program, therefore taking a vote from one of the two canditates not yet, but he is a lot closer to it than McCain. Im not selling out, im applying my vote where it will have the best effect. Nothing, but it didnt answer the question. You've show nothing, other than your not willing to open your mind to an obvious fact. If you vote for Ron, it will take the vote from the better 2nd stance candidate PERIOD.... What i said, and you know it, is that gun owners have more of a vested interest, making them care a little more about the gun rights than one who does not own a gun. I dont see you out there voting to keep gun rights around, matter of fact your going to allow a man with even less of a gun stance to enter Washington. Perhaps you didnt notice but there is a big difference in the standing between the two. You keep saying McCain has a weak stance, but the fact is Obama is on the verge of Anti-Gun all together. McCains Stance may be weak, i honestly dont see it, but Obamas stance is different by a huge huge margin.
If neither of the 2 would have gotten my vote in the first place, neither of them are gaining or losing a vote. So you admit you lied. You are in fact selling out as McCains policies aren't even close to your own, nor are they 'and this thread is proof of it' even close to what you thought they were. Actually it did as I would not vote for either, I'd rather to go prison. Does that answer it enough for you? Ahh that would be you. I've corrected you on multiple issues, I've also shown why a weak Republican could very well hurt the 2nd more than a weak Dem on the 2nd. No it will not as neither are 'better' nor would I of given either my vote in the first place. Your logic is seriously flawed. Ahh yes of which your argument in this thread kind of changed that tune, thanks for making it so easy. I'll leave you alone on that one, it must be truly embarrassing for you atm False. YOU are voting for one of two candidates that are both extremely weak on the 2nd, I myself am making a stand and not supporting either. There is a difference sure, are either strong or even remotely strong supporters of the 2nd? Not even remotely. How about the 'deficit' another issue chimed in to bash Obama, McCain loses there but yep, lets keep our heads in the sand. You dont' see it, yet one of the main reasons Republicans didn't like him before he was picked is because he is in fact weak on the 2nd. Gun ratings show him weak. His record shows him being weak. Hell the guys on my forum who are extremely Republican, extremely into guns find him weak. Yet again, a weak Republican will water down what a strong stance is considered, being more dangerous than a Democrat with a weak stance.
Grim, you win, Im going to be the bigger man here and step out. There is no reason to debate you when you wont admit the obvious.
Question to the pugs. Isn't the safety of the country in danger now that sara is not keeping an eye on russia. shouldn't she go back to her backyard and keep America safe
Sorry if I am way behind the ball on this, but honestly, I just discovered this; it was news, to me. I just heard it corroborated by David Gergen, of CNN - something I previously thought was blather by a friend of mine, too disposed to see things, at times, that aren't there. The sad, and deeply disturbing thing, is that he wasn't creating anything. McCain's trash has resulted in people calling Obama a "terrorist," and Palin's disgusting tactics - "Obama Pals with Terrorists" - has resulted in her crowds calling, among other things, for Obama's fucking death - "Kill Him!" and "Treason!". What has the McCain camp done in response? Nothing! Palin continues to believe this is all some kind of really nifty homecoming, irresponsibly vomiting the most vile, wanton, morally degenerate buckets of filth in the history of our country, and McCain is lockstep with her, mouthing it, and more, doing NOTHING in the face of the unconscionable responses by his robotic followers. I used to respect the man. His handlers have adopted from the Bush playbook, and, thankfully, the country isn't buying it. Nevertheless, for whatever honor McCain has inside his heart, for the good of the country, he should come out, forcefully, definitively, and peremptorily, slam his fuckwad handlers down, and apologize to Obama, and the country, for doing this subhuman crap, and for allowing it to be done in his name, and in the name of his party. I'm utterly disgusted. I cannot conceive how anyone would not see any of this for anything other than what it is.
No. Proximity might work. Advocating the murder of a human being, and the Democratic nominee for the presidency, might be fully in line with your Christian/Ex-Christian/Can't be Christian and be Ex-Christian mindset, or your mindless reply is typical of one lost in an impenetrable ignorance. Either way, you're not funny, and neither is this.
Well your far fetched assumptions are out right silly. No one is calling for Nobamas death. His life has crossed the lives of terrorist and Muslim extremist, and to me that calls for a bit of caution when considering the man for president of the US.
like where simply. his middle name was chosen when he was born. He had nothing to do with it. when he went to Africa he wore local clothing. ask any Irish if they have done the same thing. unless if you think he is a mole. Now ask yourself why would an african or muslem country send a man to US to impregnate a woman and have the child become president. 40 years ago. Please these stuff are really childish. as far as this guy ayeres. He knew him and lets say they were even close neighbor or even friend. He did not give it that much thought. i give you that. But you have to consider that he was a nobody tat the time. He might have closed his eyes to get some political support. Just remember that by the time t they meet ayeres was already rehabilitated.Even if you pit all of these together you get a lot of "ifs". if your uncle had boobs he would have been your aunt. All of it means nothing. We have seen Mccain collapse under pressure. He is not qualified. Palin at best is unknown. This is not the time for a maverick[even if he is] It is time for steady leadership to pass us in this storm.
Simply, you're a guy whose avatar portrays Obama as Bin Laden, and you'll forgive the dismissal of your views as those of someone radically younger than his 30 years. You've no excuse, but I won't lend you the dignity you should be earning for yourself. To others, one sample only: 0:13 of the video. "Terrorist," McCain hears it, smirks, and continues on. Far from shrinking from it, and condemning the fallout from such filth, the McCain camp is embracing the incitement - John Murtaugh's "statement" is right in goosestep: I used to admire John McCain. He has lost his honor, in my opinion. And that is a sad comment for all of us.
When did McCain Collapse under pressure? Palin Unkonwn? She has done more than Obama. Atleast she has a record of reform and "change". Obama is some guy that appeared out of nowhere, and says what everyone wants to hear, but doesnt have a record to prove he can do it or that he ever has. If my avatar causes one person to not vote for obama, then mission accomplished
mccain is reckless and the country can not afford that. our economy is shrinking and we face major problems. Mccain is not capable of handling this. He is hiding now . so is she. How long do you know her? He is running a campaign that has no vision or plan. that is a total collapse.
Your avatar also once showed you playing toy soldier, as I recall, while self-righteously condemning a host of others as "non-Christian." Now that you have abandoned your "Christianity," which is "impossible to do," as there is no such thing as a "former Christian," as you've also self-righteously proclaimed (before abandoning it, apparently, now), you're choosing to portray the Democratic nominee for the presidency as a terrorist, in order to win over someone not to vote for Obama, is, sadly, characteristic. You think like a child, Simply, in my opinion; children think no further than their nose, and have zero sense of the consequences of their thoughts and deeds. Always have, and please feel free to report that. The very filth you spout here is being pursued by John McCain and Sarah Palin, and based on the mounting frenzy of hatred coming from their rallies, it isn't inconceivable that not only their blind eye to such vile poison, but stewardship of it, may just yet result in a serious attempt on Obama's life. The success of such an attempt would also "cause [one] person to not vote for Obama." Somewhere inside that bouncing cranium of yours, perhaps you'll come to realize just how baneful a mindset you've cultivated - or is this, too, great with you, his assassination?