I don't think you would understand. Try reading up on the issue if you are curious. If you get past one book, you will be more knowledgeable than Palin. I prefer this closeup:
shooting animals is not hunting. maybe it is for cowards. @browntwn you are looking at an image that ia altered to make her look better than she was. you are not looking at how she really looked at the time. that is also true with her candidacy. she is still made up to look better than she is. and no sound. can't make what she say sound better.
I am amazed at the liberal left and their twisted views. Killing the unborn is "fine and dandy" but shooting animals from an airplane is "moral decay". That is amusing to say the least.
Let me try to paint it in primary colors, Biz, since it seems to me you're incapable of understanding subtler notions. Am I morally conflicted over abortion, generally? Yes, I am, for reasons I've shown elsewhere on this forum. There isn't a tidy answer for me. Somewhere between a pool of semen and an egg, and the beautiful being that is a child, is an entity; deciding when that takes place isn't easy. And because there are two living creatures involved, a mother and what would become a child, it isn't easy; because a woman is not solely some goddamned oven to bake a child, a "function" and no more, it feels just a tad presumptuous of me to make grand pronouncements on the matter, when none of it comes down to an easy solution. Am I morally conflicted over the notion of forcing a rape victim to carry a child to term? No, I'm not. With Palin, some on this forum have held that even in cases of rape, yes, a woman should be forced to carry the child to term. So - in your world, Biz - strap her down? Feed her daily, change the bedsheets, otherwise oversee her like a fucking plant, in order to bring the fetus to term? Am I morally conflicted over the notion of killing animals in order to mount a skull on a wall? Wasting predators cuz it makes one feel bigger, or, in Palin's words, "awesomer"? No, I'm not. Palin's idiocy in looking to a book from over a half century ago for justification of her aerial wolf wasting program - $400,000 in Alaska public funds, $150 for every foreleg of a dead wolf brought in - no, I'm not conflicted, and yes, I feel she's a shortsighted, ignorant, morally degenerate person.
So you are prolife except when it comes to rape? From reading articles on Palin I think she is of higher moral standards than you and most forum posters. Her family values and views on the unborn fall into the same category as the majority. I wish more Americans had her values. Her values are higher than Obama, Biden, and McCain. If she were on the ticket with Obama would you be jumping for joy?
In your mind, as you must necessarily construct, pitiable as that is to me. Yes, you do. Always a winning argument. Yes, you do. By your sense of things, yes, you believe this. No, I flatly wouldn't, since I'm not opposing Palin for her ticket alignment, nor am I supporting Obama, to the extent that I am, anyway, for his ticket alignment. What I would think seems obvious to most is apparently another subtlety of thought that eludes your grasp.
what you fail to understand is that the country is rejecting you and your attempt to force your values on the rest of us.
In the future, when you choose to rail on others, please leave my name out of your post. That should take care of it.
Sure, guess that is easier than actually reading, bud. Also guess that's easier than again admitting you're wrong, something like: On the mea culpa thing: It really doesn't hurt, pal. Personal responsibility, and all that.
Oh Jesus Christ! Really do we have to discuss this? OK, when you are looking for your bad guys, and you list me as "being online" it has implications. Easily denyable to be sure. Just leave me off you damned list. OK? Got a problem with that? You want another apology? Believe me... I am so sorry. Now leave me alone.
I left you alone to begin with, Jazz, having said "howdy," and nothing else in the way of accusing you of anything. You got your panties in a lather, and wrongly leapt to something that wasn't there - for the second time. Now, you seem pretty acutely sensitive about this crap. Which is a bit funny, when you've also certainly felt free to chime in with a smart ass comment, regularly, otherwise: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=9339741&postcount=319 http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=9378084&postcount=67 http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=9388486&postcount=141 No worries - I'll leave you alone, again.
You apparently missed it the first time. I'll say it again: As you were on this earlier thread, I also made my views known there, as well: Let me know if my thoughts on this still confuse you.
"Confuse" is not quite the word I would use. I am glad you have a clear view on the aerial hunting of predators for money.
Yes, I do have a clear view on that, as with many other things. I understand your world paints in primary colors, only, each and every time, so it's not something you can hang your hat on.
Are you for the death penalty as well? Or is it a mix between magenta and cyan on the additive color chart or wheel?
Palin's Husband Pushed to Get Trooper Fired, Documents Show. Hiding behind her husband. pugs do not like to be hold responsible. all vote for "that one". stop she-chaney and the paliban
You know north, one thing ive noticed with you, is you remain undecided on many issues. Yet you attack those that commit to theirs. And when one shows the slightest bit of indecision you attack that indecision. You really get a kick out of this dont you.