Do you think that PR 0 - 10 is enough? I think google should make more levels. So instead of PR0 I can have pr 1
Wouldn't be logical, since PR0 also has the denotion of N/A, where a site has not yet been indexed or ranked. And by the way, don't promote your site like that.
PR 0 and N/A is different.. N/a site is not yet indexed in google while 0 is already indexed... I would to make it just PR 0 and PR 1. I will suggest it in GOOGLE... hehe
No need. The 0-10 system is perfectly fine. Was the personal trainer link added deliberately or unintentionally ? ( Not in the signature, but in the post...)
It was intentional at the time. But it was unintentional in the grand scale of things, seeing as though I had forgotten the ettiquette here. Sorry. BTW I think It should be PL (page level) not PR. Rank has conotions of military.
Psychologically I suppose. However it isn't difficult to get to a 3 or a 4 with a bit of effort. Going beyond that is the main part.
1 - 12 isn't very many. Why not make it 1 - 100? Or simplify it to rubbish, OK, good, great, excellent and ......
That is DEFINITELY one of the weirdest threads I've seen recently across DP forums Anyway, after all who cares about the PR itself. At least for me only the particular rankings of my sites are important...
Wierd idea i must say, cause everybody usually rate anything out of 5 or 10. Like 7/10 or 5/10 and so on.. PR 10 last, Seems perfect to me.