The Sarah Palin Thread

Ahh yes because someone states something on their page that equals what exactly?

The NRA themselves have blasted McCain in the past, Republicans blasted him in the primaries for his weak 2nd amendment stance.

 

He supports the 2nd amendment.

 

All politicians say they support it, their actions is what you need to look at.

But I see your great debate strategy shines though again.

 

What actions did you witness. Does McCain want it removed from the constitution? Did he call you and tell you to turn your gun in?

 

Do you even read?

His voting record for starters.

 

Yea I can read.

 

I guess you can only read 'biased' sources.

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=9440536&postcount=1392

 

Is this what you want me to read?

 

Part of it...

The NRA blasting him as well, how about Republicans blasting him for being weak on the 2nd?

hmmmmmmmmmm

 

What is wrong on that list to you.

 

I believe I put those items that are a weak stance on the 2nd in my post in bold. That is also not all he did that's weak on the 2nd, just a small list.

But then again the NRA and Republicans blasting him for it, I guess they are wrong as well.

 

These Grim you have Problems with? I

* Calls for GOP "tolerance" of closing gun show loopholes. (May 2002)
* Ban cheap guns; require safety locks; for gun show checks. (Aug 1999)
* Supports ban on certain assault weapons. (Aug 1999)
* Punish criminals who abuse 2nd Amendment rights. (May 1999)
* Youth Violence Prevention Act restricts guns for kids. (May 1999)
* Voted YES on more penalties for gun & drug violations. (May 1999)

 

For starters, I love how you leave out the NRA and Republicans bashing his stance on the 2nd.

 

Grims claim that McCain doesn't support the second is whats weak, McCains record shows 25 years of second amendment support. I dont see how thats weak support.

And i love the way he bashes the NRA in one thread, and uses it as a valid source in another.

 

The NRA bashing him, Republicans bashing him, votes that are a very watered down stance on the 2nd is not weak?

During the primaries a tactic against McCain in many debates was 'hes' weak on the 2nd' now that he's the golden boy though it's funny how that fades...

 

So your vote will go to a man that is even worse. Nice logic, Real Nice

 

A lot of people "blast" other people for a lot of stuff. That doesn't mean it's necessarily true. Just because he allegedly got "blasted" for his stand on the second ammendment does not mean that he's anti gun ownership. I'd like to hear something else besides that he was "blasted" by somebody.

 

Ron Paul is 'worse' on the 2nd than McCain?

 

How is it weak? He votes for practically everything in support of the second.

Your facts dont add up to a weak stance

 

No but Obama is, and A vote for Ron is a vote for Obama