One thing to consider is that if Obama were to get out of politics, he would only have his $4,000,000 per year to spend. If he is elected then he gets to stick his hands in every wallet in the U.S. and spend, spend, spend on his favorite social programs.
she taught Mcsame a few things. didn't she don't feel bad. She has manipulated the press for so many years. She is very smart.
No! Not at all. You are not qualified to be President. I find it hard to believe that someone would just single you without you having made a personal insult to them, and inviting a confrontation. Who would care enough to find out who you were, where you lived ? You are just some guy on a forum.
You are probably more qualified to be President than one of the candidates and you would probally do a better job than than both parties. That is if you did not start filling your pockets and lose your morals. Washington does have that effect on people.
Thanks for the concern, but it isnt a problem. The sender was such a moron he bragged that he knew my address already then told me the name of the wrong town. I sent the name of the correct town and said he was welcome to visit if he had the balls... but trust me, he doesnt. He's a posturing loser. Thanks ~ rob
this could be an appropiate thread for this From the NY Daily News Tuesday, 16 SEP 2008: Personal treason soils all John McCain once stood for Tuesday, September 16th 2008, 4:00 AM
Come on pizzaman. You act like whoever wrote that has some form of credibility. He calls the underhanded remarks by Obama about Palin lies. Generally, they aren't lies. I have no doubt that his comment was not a coincidence considering these speeches are revised and the writers are the best in the world. This wasn't a simple "slip of tongue" here. Regardless, it is an opinion and the Republicans saw the opportunity get a +1 based on Obama's speech. There is nothing there that I see to be a lie. You might disagree on the concept, but to say it was a lie is misleading to say the least.
i think he is correct. he has a column in dailynews which is a major NY newspaper. he has a lot of credibility. you just do not want to deal with the truth
Actually they're not lies. "Each class or course in comprehensive sex 14 education offered in any of grades K through 12 shall 15 include instruction on the prevention of sexually transmitted 16 infections, including the prevention, transmission and spread 17 of HIV. Nothing in this Section prohibits instruction in 18 sanitation, hygiene or traditional courses in biology." This text comes directly from the law. So as crazy as it sounds and as much as you might enjoy calling him a liar again, what he says is true. Source
let us ask how people that were there think what happened. Cindy McCain Blasts 'The View' for 'Picking Their Bones Clean'.
Was that response meant for me? I hope not. I gave you documented proof which disproves your post. You can't just ignore it. As terrible as it sounds, Obama supports a law to teach sex ed to Kindergardners.
i support sex ed. If you look at pailin family then you will see why . This issue is already dealt with to my satisfaction.
Fair enough, but we are talking about McCain's statement that Obama supported teaching sex education to kindergartners. I'm thinking that you really don't want to support that. 1) Close mouth. 2) Engage brain. 3) Think about this. 4) OK, now let's see what happens.
I like this very lively discussion. I do not like either candidate for President. The VPs are interesting.
I just gave up and put pizzaman on "ignore". Have seen enough of his posts to see he doesnt know the difference between "thought provoking" vs just trying to provoke people. Sure I wont miss any pearls of wisdom.
Well, that is just plain wrong. BUT, didn't you post that "Personal treason soils all John McCain once stood for"? Wasn't your point that McCain was lying about Obama? I showed that he wasn't. You said that you liked sex education. Do I have that right? We are trying to talk about your "Personal treason soils all John McCain once stood for" post here, and not your views on sex education.
I had him on ignore for a long time. It appeared that he was making some coherent statements so I tuned back in to the pizzaman channel. The signal is getting weak again...