Pugs are vicious little dogs. I've had several of them go after my pup, which is nuts as he's much bigger than them. Had I let him 'bite' back they would have made a small snack
I'm waiting for one of the Monty Python cast to come on and say "Stop! Stop this sketch... it's just getting silly".
I don't believe or 'know that'. I could be wrong, I however believe he believes in secession as a way to stick it to the feds for over reaching their power. I could however be wrong as I don't agree with him 100% on the details, but believe we may agree on the principle and or meat of the matter at hand.
Yeah I'm the one playing with the question you asked. If you don't know what country he's from, well try paying attention a bit more. Something tells me you know, I however am not going to place personal information out there about anyone. If you honestly don't know you'll have to wait for him to tell you.
Ahh yes because bringing up a good point on the subject at hand is almost the same as trolling in and saying 'you argue just to argue' or to debate you about 'you' and not a point. Yep almost the same. I see no anti US mission from him, not that 'obvious'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNlc...9/14/alaska-women-reject-palin-rally-is-huge/ Alaska women reject Pailin http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dStP_ouJYHg&feature=related
As Palin isnt pro-secession nor has secession been a big campaign issue since about 1860, this seems a weird rabbit trail for the thread to take, much less fight over.
Being critical of the US government, the current politicians, foreign policy is not being Anti US. Far from it. I guess we should be communist and love 'dare we speak out' about anything our government does that we do not agree with.
Her husband sure appears to be, plus those in the party in Alaska sure appeared to believe she was. Could she be against it now even though she was for it before becoming the VP pick? --- BTW the newest 'fight' over it appears to be more bashing of an individual and not the subject matter at hand. I for one would rather speak of the subject matter at hand, and not go off on a tirade bashing and debating a members debate style over that of the issue at hand.
sexist comment. and they are scared of her capabilities. another sexist decision don't even know what feminism is about. and i can't spell
What is your hard on with debating about 'others' and not the subject at hand. I'm not going to play this game with you, I find it extremely childish that you must always debate about 'others' but rarely the topic at hand. G also honestly does not need my support. I however do not see what you claimed that 'all' see, I was also the one debating with him on the subject you decided to bring up which is the reason I even decided to call you on it. The government we have today is not in anyway what the founders had in mind, for someone to be against what the government is and wanting to go back to our roots is not 'Anti-American' if anything I'd say those siding with the bloated government and not ranting against what we have become, that is against what we were founded upon, are the true 'Anti-American's'
Motives matter, sure they do, dispute the facts though not the person. If he was slandering you, stalking you, doing something I could see going on a rant here and there, but your tactic of debating about a person for pages on end I find simply ridiculous. Ahh yes because you insinuated that we 'all knew' what G was about in your own words, yet I did not, plus I was the one debating with him on the ISSUE at hand. You were the one who decided to basically debate about a person, taking the issue being discussed totally off track. Then to top it all off decided to play games 'where does he live' and continue debating about 'him' and not the matter at hand. He decries American's as a whole as murderers, thieves, liars and rapists? Not the government, select soldiers and the like. Please lets see those hundreds 'if not thousands' of posts where he attacks and calls all Americans what you claim. Then again I honestly do not want to 'debate' about a 'person' I'd prefer to stay at least on an issue that does not involve a person on the forums.