What are you talking about? I am confused as he** trying to make any sense of what you are talking about. Does anyone know what pizza is talking about?
I see how they lie about Obama and about their own records in the ads I have watched, that does not take away from the fact you using such names only puts you down to their level and paints a bias that is impossible to overcome.
i was trying to talk to them the way they understand. i could have said mcshame mccane mcsane mcvane or even macbush but i did not want to disrespect the man but present his point of view in one word. Mcsame. check out my sig
Then I'd suggest you start to make posts that contain substantive argument. I honestly don't see any difference between your posts, and the posts of Homebiz, for example - I see only propaganda, for the both of you. Sorry.
nothing homes is my hero. he has shown me the way. with one exception. i only post the truth. sorry you miss that point. by the way i think Mccain have said that this is not a decision based on issues. =========================================================== republicans have ruined the country. for example when the nation wanted to discuss the iraq war. They silenced every opposing opinion. they got us into an unnecessary war. Remember the dixie chicks
Don't confuse the amount of ink you place on a page as a substantive argument. Your post are slanted and filled with propaganda and is the same old recycled slanted propaganda. When all else fails you rely on seeing future potential in a candidate or raw ability. That is a great load of crock. Still a pencil slim resume without action.
Don't confuse titteringly stealing a thought from another member for wit, which requires skill. Start there, start trying to think of something original, then proceed to debate with me, or anyone on the forum, with something cogently argued. As it stands, you and pizza both rely on the same skein of confusion and obduracy.
we make our point quick and fast and strong. you just like to read your own writing. ===================================================================== republicans have hurt the country so much They pushed Bolton into UN against the will of the country and caused more damage to our country. using a loophole seems to be the main strategy of the republicans. Bolton endorses Mccain
You and Pizza do rely on the same skein of confusion and obduracy. You add a little more wine and cheese but it is still the same laughable content.
Your posts, and Biz's posts, are two peas in a pod, no disagreement there. I mean, after all, stuff like: Is certifiable, lucid, truth. Like coal, hardened to diamond incisiveness; like merde du taur, hardened to dauntless, impenetrable armor, like, like... well, as I said, it's certifiable.
"Wine and cheese" wasn't bad, Biz, not bad at all. It shows metaphorical ability, something I appreciate. And timely. Braising a coq au vin, enjoying a Williamette Valley pinot, and a Roth Kaese "Van Gogh" wedge. Love rainy Sundays.
My previous response to your post was a thoughtful answer without namecalling or fingerpointing and you toss out this? LOL. Just remember if that condition lasts more than 4 hours... be sure to seek medical attention.
If you read the time line of events the post you are responding to was posted to Homebiz, not yourself. In other words if anything he was giving you a compliment.
Rob, we've moved on, it seems, and I'm glad for that. Your dismissing my thoughts as illogical simply based on the length of my posts was something I wouldn't buy, but hell, we moved on - at least I think we have. On the other hand, Biz's attempting to make a point by simply aping you was meritless, at least to me. You may find me longwinded, so might he, but to say I post nothing but insubstantive posts is, well...you get it, I think. Edit: posted before seeing Grim's post: Yes, Grim, you got it. I didn't agree with Rob - that I post long, but illogical posts - but I credit him with wit, cogency and skill, something lacking by Homebiz, at least as betrayed by his tripping in posting something a point obviously already made by another member.
If I misread his repsonse then i owe him an apology... it was placed below a quote with my name, but I am capable of error. I was kind of hoping somebody'd take a shot at an answer to the issue of redistribution of wealth and the remarks on Obama's 2nd amendment record... all i saw was subsequent throwing of feces. If he was responding to those then I erred.
If you consider my response just a tossing of feces, sorry, man, them's my thoughts. But I did consider your points, as I always do, and responded accordingly.
As far as the 2nd goes, neither candidate is truly pro 2nd amendment. In fact at one time the NRA had McCain scored as a C from my reading. He has not been a true supporter of the 2nd, not in any form. Is he slightly better than Obama? Perhaps, but nothing like selling out ones principles to simply support one who is 'slightly better' As far as the bill of rights, McCain does not support all of them, neither party does.
Geez - No, npt, the feces throwing mention wasnt about your comment. Lotta this misreading goin around today. LOL. This thing is moving faster than a lotta chat rooms.... we all need to slow down and read carefully. I just tried to apologize for misreading yours. Grim - Yes, McCain has always had a low mark from me on 2nd amendment... just not as low as I'd mark Obama. McCain at least has the restraining force of his party to deal with, while Obamas party is not of that view.
on redisturbution of wealth from thre top 5% to the rest of people it is a very good idea as far as 2nd amendment, i have already told you that there is no way that Obama can do anything to change that. there is no urgency but you still want to fool people to vote for Mccain shoe me what obama can do to 2nd amendment. ======================================================== republicans damaged the country republican allowed Wolfowitz stay at the world bank while he disgraced all of us by increasing the salary of his girlfrient