I put a lot of man hours into this site. I designed it myself. Tell me what you think http://www.smartsafelist.com Thanks
The design is really neat. I like it. I also like the idea. I dont see any errors that can be fixed. Good Job.
First off - you need to re-proofread your site. I found this in "What is a Safe List?" You also alternately have it as "safelist" and "safe list". It has a great look to it, but unless you fix the text (and I found lots of other grammar/spelling mistakes) it is going to come off as amateur.
The overall layout and design is nice and it's easy to navigate. But I have to agree with Jeccles I think the gramatical errors should be fixed.
Thanks for the reviews. I will go back and look over the text. One thing I would like to point out is I use "safelist" and "safe list" because those are 2 keywords I'm trying to rank for. So I try to switch it up. Not sure if it helps or hurts, but thats why I did that.
I also think you need to add more spacing to your left margin, the text needs more breathing room on either side.
You can still put both variations into your keywords, but I would suggest that you keep the spelling constant within the body of your text.
Menus on sidebar are looking good..but on the top header u just cut a photo n pasted !!well what's the design in that?? The idea of the site is perfect n try to add a favicon
Thanks for the great tips and ideas. I fixed some of the spelling errors, added a fav. icon, fixed the spacing with the text on the left hand side, and I even added a 160x600 ad on the left hand side that I created.
Good looking website, looks like you invested some hard work in it. There are only a few things I like to mention: - The articles on the left site look like Google adds, maybe you should change the look a bit. The titles should be bigger because there is no real contrast with the text, the eye is not drawn to them. - I see that you can improve the internal linking structure. If I click on a article from the left site, and all the rest dissapear in the details page. Maybe do a related articles section under each, to improve the internal linking and boost a bit those keywords from the titles. - the rest seems to bee ok, good work until now