Get Backlinks from Relevant Websites, Automatically

dealsonweb

- Takes up to 24 hours for your site to be approved. Because they are approved manually, this ensures no 'bad' sites get into thte system. This means we can all be prettey confident that the sites we get links FROM and give links TO are okay.

Phynder

- I don't know the number of sites in the system as it grows daily. As mentioned above, I would guess around 5 or 600, but it grows daily.

justinlo

- At the moment, all I can say is that on one of my sites in the system that has 10 INBOUND links I am giving out 5 OUTBOUND links

Hope that helps

 

Groan. This should be an easy statistic to report to potential subscribers.

 

I have joined Neurolinker, it seems like a great way to build some backlinks, but am having trouble adding a PHP page with my outlinks on it.

Could someone please assist me with this please? There are instructions on the site, but I am useless with PHP, and don't really understand them.
My site is running on Wordpress, could someone please how I can add this PHP page.

Any help would be much appreciated,
Thanks,
Carl

 

Neurolinker would do well to create a WordPress plugin which makes it easy for the one billion bloggers to add it to their site.

 

You can add PHP code on WP, but you need to install the Exec-PHP plugin then activate it...

Get it here

 

Just added a video showing the backlinks I have to one of my sites from teh neurolinker control panel

Will be adding more videos in time

Check my blog out

http://neurolinker.org

 

But where are the links at? I saw in the list of inbound links to your site only pages like /links.php or /relatedlinks or /outboundlinks.php - your links just being placed on one page? Or are the links being embedded into the content of relevant pages of the other site. Good work with the video, but I didn't see your links that come from the other sites.

So, for instance - my blog is about stocks. But I write about charities at times. A link from a post about a charity would be relevant for a particular charity, but maybe not from a page about Google stock.

 

The links come from what ever page the other website owners place the links code on. That could be a new page or an existing page for exampke. The inbound links aren't placed in content, they come from the same links page.

Hope that makes sense.

 

It makes sense, but it has been done to death. "Links" pages are basically worthless, except for traffic. I was excited about the concept, but if the links are not in content, then all the fancy NLP algorithms won't do much as Google can easily detect the links I saw on the websites in your video. Consider writing code that embeds the links into content - that would be sweet and basically undetectable if the links are relevant.

 

send me more details of this thing dude

 

Thanks for the help,
I actually ended up using a different plugin called runPHP (it was easier to use)
http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/runphp/

I have since submitted my site for review, and it will be interesting to see how it goes.
Cheers

 

how many backlink do you think you will get for entertainment site?

 

I'll check that out myself, thanks

The sites in the system aren't classified into categories, as NL determines their relevance to your site by keywords so I don't know how many backlinks you'd get for entertainment. You could join, try it and see what happens. You've got your guarantee, so if you're not happy after a coupld months, just cancel it.

I'll mention that suggestion on the neurolinker forum and see what Marc, the creator of the system, thinks.

 

Actually Phynder it is not true that link pages are wothless as you claim. Here is an article that points out that ALL links have value:

http://searchengineland.com/080114-132615.php

You are correct that a link embedded within a content article has more value, no one disputes that, but of course getting any large number of those is pretty impossible without a ton of work on your part. Neurolinker gives you relevant backlinks, ie backlinks from relevant websites, and eliminated 99% of the labor involved in doing so, for a small fraction of what you'd pay someone on these DP forums to do even the most basic link building activity for you. Each link has value, especially links from relevant websites, and if you get them in large numbers from relevant websites at a cheap price, this seems like a no brainer to me.

 

I am trying to give you a pass here. Link pages are crap. If the true value of your service is in the algorithms for matching sites that are relevant, then it is a worthless service if the links are just jumbled together on a links page.

Okay, here is the deal. I spent a good amount of effort to do the same thing - Links In Context. The idea was to match page to page relevant links. So, if my stock market blog had a random entry about horses, the links in context could potentially find a link for that post to a relevant horse article. The important juicy part of the equation is the link being embedded in the content in a relevant context - that is the kicker.

Alas, after many years of development - the links in context service fell apart from lack of funding. It required a lot of crawling and number crunching. I was really excited to see your service being offered, because I started links in context as a service I would use. If someone can do it right, then I will use it. I think it will be a killer application.

So, you can be defensive or you can learn a little from some constructive criticism. I am not saying your service is crap - I am saying aspects are crap - namely the use of link pages. You might want to get independent opinions from other web masters via poll on DigitalPoint. Good luck - I will definitely use the service if you can get the in content links working!

 

Interested but I would like to hear from actual subscribers with a higher Itrader. You can post reply here or PM me

thanks

 

Ive been a member for a week, since I joined i have no increase in backlinks. When I joined there were 4, I rejected 1 as it wasnt relevant to my niche, since then I have not received any other links? Why is this??

If you are going to state that it depends upon the sites in the "system" this will not be for me, as it is apparant that you have little to no sites in your "system" that is relevant to my site or niche.

 

It;s early days for sure. And when the site numbers increase, so will the availability of a wider variety of niches.

The creator is taking a poll on allowing sub domains into the system at the moment with members having the option to reject them if they don't want subs as backlinks, so if that goes ahead, the number of sites and niches in the system will rapidly increase

 

Why wouldn't the system allow sub domains? I can't even guess why that would be a concern.

 

So with the sounds of it, I am wasting my time and money now in the "early days", I would be best cancelling my subscription and coming back in a month or 2...