Obama's VP Candidate Is Pro-RIAA, Anti-Privacy

So, if you want the RIAA to collect more power, if you want less privacy, vote Obama?

http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/VP-Candidate-Is-ProRIAA-AntiPrivacy-97192


This sucks...

 

At least it is not a clinton. Who do you think Obama should have picked?

 

lol, I think he should have picked Clinton, but thats me. He would have won then. But I dont know now since he chose a VP that has said some crazy stuff over time... And how is Biden "change" when he has been in the senate for 30+ years?

 

If he really wanted to win he should of picked Clinton.
1. Would help unite the party
2. Get back some the clinton supporters who said they will vote for McCain.
3. Clinton has millions and millions of supporters who would vote for him. What did Biden have? 9000?

 

Many people that voted for Obama were republicans voting against Clinton. Clinton said a lot of crap about Obama that the republicans would have run with. The female Clinton came with the baggage of Bill. When Bill was in my state he was tagging anything that moved. Obama did not need that attention.

 

Would you consider yourself a typical American?

 

What does that have to do with anything?

 

What is a typical American?

 

A typical American is a person that actually believes what the people on TV tell him. If the American people would have only a little more understanding of global politics, they would never vote for any of the 2 parties.

 

That's an American stereotype, which is typical of Europeans.

 

This does not sound too bad, this might be a good thing and stopping theft of copyright stuff from the internet.

 

The stereotype has proven itself for so many years. An intellectual society would never vote for any of the existing parties.

A country that is ruled so much by its elite that it is almost frightening to see. Many people seem to forget that corporatism carries exactly the same description in the dictionary as fascism. Both are based upon corporations and government forming one front. A country in wich the monetary system is ruled by a small group of bankers. A federal monetary system based around NOTHING. Yes Europe can be bad, but the US system is something to laugh about for all of us here. And yes we also get Fox, but it is regarded as a fun and gossip channel.

 

Yeah, you should pity us Americans, we have it so bad. Please ask your governments to send us financial aid.

 

Here is a video that Jew-lover browntwn will like. Usually American politicians stick with their heads in the Zionist a$$es, but this one says it openly.

Joe Biden: "I am a Zionist."

http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=mZvypFPscP8


Exterminate all Zionists - Jews and non-Jews - and the world will know peace.

 

Corporatism is what Mussolini described as fascism.

Agreed with the rest of your post as well. But you have to understand that we (Europeans) have a culture and usually a decent education level compared to a country that hardly had a past and the little they had were wars, frightened as they are. As for their education level, if my memory serves me correctly the USA is 34rd on the list, which is the worst score of all the Western countries.
In my honest opinion, the decreasing level of education in conjunction with the use of aspartame in 6,000 products (aspartame causes a decrease of 20 IQ points, not to mention serious health problems) is done on purpose to keep the masses dumb, to have enough soldiers fighting the Zionist wars.

 

You forgot to add that Biden is the main legislative mastermind behind the war on drugs and our world record prison population.

He also wrote the recent bankruptcy bill.

Choices choices, do we vote for the military-financial complex - or the military financial complex?

I think I'll join the large majority of voters in staying home this year.

 

Your gross prejudices fall short of the mark.

And you have missed the mark regarding corporatism. "Corporatism" has nothing to do with corporation-state collusion, per se. Corporatism is a political-economic system whereby society is structurally organized by "corporatist" entities representing various political-economic interests - in the "classic" era of corporatism, when corporatism was used by the state as a means to curb individual participation in political economies (the interwar period 1919-1939), it included agrarian, industrial, labor, even religious groupings, and was expressed in Italy, Spain, Germany, Japan, USSR, and, to some extent, FDR's New Deal. You have apparently read wiki, or something, and confused these groupings for "corporations" in the term's other common understanding.

There are neo-corporatist elements today in many societies, that go in the "opposite" direction, i.e., allow for increased decisionmaking by political-economic elements in the political-economic process. Particularly in Europe, in those countries where the structure of labor unions is hierarchically conceived such that bargaining takes place, in essence, between a more or less unitary labor, capital, and state in reaching mutually agreeable decisions. Your own country is, in this sense, neo-corporatist. (Investigate your country's "Polder" model of tri-partite cooperation between producers, labor, and the state).

As such, "corporatism" is distinguished from "pluralism." Look them both up and then please come back to speak to American ignorance.

 

Rank, I am telling you that I am reporting you. You may find your race-hatred and advocating mass murder behind the safety of your keyboard acts as a temporary palliative for your personal weaknesses, but it is not acceptable in this community.

 

China is currently paying your debts. Keep borrowing from them.