Cool cuill !!!

Discussion in 'Google' started by Cooldracu, Aug 4, 2008.

  1. Adulu

    Adulu Peon

    Messages:
    2,791
    Likes Received:
    43
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #41
    Ant VS Elephant
    [​IMG]
     
    Adulu, Aug 4, 2008 IP
  2. theman12468

    theman12468 Peon

    Messages:
    537
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #42
    Now how would you know if that ant is poisonous or not???
     
    theman12468, Aug 4, 2008 IP
  3. mshore

    mshore Peon

    Messages:
    416
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #43
    cuil.com is still young, and once upon a time Google was the underdog to sites such as Yahoo and Alta Vista (remember them?). Well, I'm not impressed with Cuil right now, but there is still a lot of room to grow and I will not say that Google is permanent, because nothing is. If Cuil is going to take more market share from Google they will have to work hard at it.
     
    mshore, Aug 4, 2008 IP
  4. Business_in_2008

    Business_in_2008 Peon

    Messages:
    725
    Likes Received:
    18
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #44
    Google is like .com in the end user's mind.

    Not that it can't be beat, but it's so trusted that only Google can beat it self down at this point in time.
     
    Business_in_2008, Aug 4, 2008 IP
  5. DanLar75

    DanLar75 Peon

    Messages:
    824
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #45
    Well, they do have a nice layout and some smart people (ex. googlers) and $30 million+ is a LOT more than google started with.. I don't see why not!
     
    DanLar75, Aug 4, 2008 IP
  6. axs

    axs Guest

    Best Answers:
    0
    #46
    Disagree, Google is too big to beat now.
     
    axs, Aug 4, 2008 IP
  7. boxer126

    boxer126 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    878
    Likes Received:
    25
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    145
    #47
    Maybe, if it didn't suck ass.

    -boxer126
     
    boxer126, Aug 4, 2008 IP
  8. amanamission

    amanamission Notable Member

    Messages:
    1,936
    Likes Received:
    138
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    210
    #48
    This overhyped piece of junk has some very stupid JV money behind it. Get ready for the next round of investors with digital dollars in their eyes crying all the way to their broker as they lose their asses on weak concepts like this.

    Here comes another bubble...
     
    amanamission, Aug 4, 2008 IP
  9. swedal

    swedal Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,767
    Likes Received:
    426
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #49
    You are all so "now" oriented. Give Cuil some time and maybe they can compete. Clearly they need to keep improving. Google was not built in a day and Cuil won't be either.

    The thing is that Google needs a competitor the internet community needs for them to have a legitimate competitor.
     
    swedal, Aug 4, 2008 IP
  10. Brandon Sheley

    Brandon Sheley Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    9,721
    Likes Received:
    612
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    420
    #50
    cuil sux, if you search for my town, you'll get a page that starts downloading a worm :DD
     
    Brandon Sheley, Aug 4, 2008 IP
  11. amanamission

    amanamission Notable Member

    Messages:
    1,936
    Likes Received:
    138
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    210
    #51
    The thing is, this search engine is being hyped as a serious competitor to Google. Now, I use Google a hundred times a day. I have tried every other SE, and find, especially with "novelty" ones, that the search results give too much information and make it hard to see multiple listings. In other words, only useful if you plan to visit the top five results.

    What sucks about cuil.com (apart from the lame name) is that there is so much text from each site, you can only see the top five results. This is not going to change, this is the concept. Some people might like this, but I certainly don't, and I doubt most serious users of search will. It interferes with finding the site I'm actually seeking. I generally go 10-20 pages deep on some searches if I want to know everything about a service.

    The results themselves might improve, but why launch an obviously inferior contender before it is dressed to impress? Why throw all this hype at another crappy second-best? If it needs to improve still, why launch it to the deafening sound of all this fanfare? Answer: somebody thinks we're suckers. This is somebody's idea of a quick buck, and I personally intend to talk trash until my site ranks above directory listings of my site for searches of my name.

    And I HATE the name. Even cool.com would be stupid, but cuil is not brandable unless your market speaks Gaellic.

    This will never fly. Do see the video in my previous post, it is pure genius.
     
    amanamission, Aug 4, 2008 IP
  12. coolguy`

    coolguy` Banned

    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #52
    haa its true...
     
    coolguy`, Aug 4, 2008 IP
  13. StrongMinder

    StrongMinder Banned

    Messages:
    223
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #53
    It will be the Second Biggest SE. soon
     
    StrongMinder, Aug 4, 2008 IP
  14. clinton

    clinton Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,166
    Likes Received:
    44
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #54
    Cuil sounds like some kind of food...what is it and what does it have to do with Google?:D
     
    clinton, Aug 4, 2008 IP
  15. amanamission

    amanamission Notable Member

    Messages:
    1,936
    Likes Received:
    138
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    210
    #55
    Some uppity ex-employees of Google have convinced about 30 million dollars of JV money that they can do a better job.:rolleyes:

    Hey, pass me some of that over here...:D
     
    amanamission, Aug 4, 2008 IP
  16. indyonline

    indyonline Prominent Member

    Messages:
    4,626
    Likes Received:
    248
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    335
    #56
    It would be nice to see some competition for the big G but I dont really see it happening. I think it would take a couple big boy's like yahoo and msn to merge to be able to compete.
     
    indyonline, Aug 4, 2008 IP
  17. amanamission

    amanamission Notable Member

    Messages:
    1,936
    Likes Received:
    138
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    210
    #57
    Actually, IMHO, it could be done, but not by throwing money and hype at it. What is needed is a new concept in search, something which addresses the weaknesses of Google and existing SE's.

    Google is not the best because it had the most money. It is the best because it had the smartest concept.

    In order to even approach Google as a SE, the algorithm would need to be more useful than Google's, delivering higher quality results more quickly and easily. This cuil doesn't come close, and would need a completely different concept to even be useful.

    I've seen some interesting attempts to take on Google (what was that one that rotates site snaps on a cube?), but this is just a clever scam.

    Revenge of the nerds!

    For those of you who missed it:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6IQ_FOCE6I
     
    amanamission, Aug 4, 2008 IP
  18. coolguy`

    coolguy` Banned

    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #58


    I dont think so..there is no chance..

    I think guruji.com is the better search engine than cuil.

    it gives more accurate details than cuil..:mad:
     
    coolguy`, Aug 5, 2008 IP
  19. vegabond

    vegabond Shabu Anower

    Messages:
    1,656
    Likes Received:
    289
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #59
    Not a good start, their search result sucks:
    http://www.cuil.com/search?q=phpLD+templates

    Does not bring good result and giving same URL multiple times! :eek: They should invest more money to improve the algo and then come to live.
     
    vegabond, Aug 5, 2008 IP
  20. Lurznm

    Lurznm Banned

    Messages:
    683
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #60
    I disagree with this, it's the other way around actually.
     
    Lurznm, Aug 5, 2008 IP