You are trying to use a circular argument to disprove the existence of an omnipotent God. He can also do things we will never understand.
ok, he can also do things we will never understand BUT how did you understand this that he can do things we never understand ????? how do you know about this ... is god told you ?
Again it is just another circular argument. Perhaps we can't understand why we understand what we do understand. We can do this all day. At the end of the day, you just have to accept that there are things that we won't understand but are real.
^ we don't understand something thats fact and nature of human mind , we never finish to understand anything in this world... but that doesn't mean GOD is exists.
Exactly, and just like there are things that we don't understand, just because we don't understand some things about God doesn't mean he doesn't exist.
ME - Doesn't exist >> just we can say there is nothing YOU - Does exist >> there have something (god) > me don't need proof because there is nothing < > You are showing proof something thats what things we both didn't understand thats not GOD or there have no any relations with GOD <
sorry! this is just confusing but it doesn't make any sense. If God is omnipotent, then He can do anything. remember that "to do" and "not to do" always go together but since "not to do" does not exist, only "to do" remains. remember that to every "+" there is always the "-" but since the "-" is just a darkside effect, it does not exist by itself. it is just the abscence of "+" . 2. Therefore, God can create a rock so heavy that he cannot lift it. "he cannot lift it" is just the abscence of "He can lift it" but since "he cannot lift it" is a darkside effect, it does not exist by itself hence only "he can lift it" exists. therefore, God can create a rock so heavy but he can lift it.
I'm not trying to prove to you that there is a God. I'm trying to point out to you that just because there are things that we don't understand does not mean he doesn't exist. You are using circular arguments to disprove him. I am simply saying that just like anything else that we don't understand but would agree do exist, God can be in the same category.
we don't understand but how do agree exist ? we have to understand anything before that we agree exist.
You said that you don't understand the human mind. Using the same logic you are currently using, would you say that the human mind does not exist? I am making the point that there are several things in the world that we believe in but don't quite fully understand them. God is no different.
you know one by one reason is rule our world thats very simple logic example : i am using HP computer > reason : i bought this computer > reason : HP made this computer > reason : they need profit > reason : HP owner like money making > reason : .... etc etc ...and never END like this world. so reasons owned this world NOT God , reasons was creator of this world. this world have no starting and ending, everything will change again and again.