U.S. Forces on a Border Outpost "Tactically" Retreat - WTH Is A "Tactical Retreat"??

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by webwork, Jul 17, 2008.

  1. debunked

    debunked Prominent Member

    Messages:
    7,298
    Likes Received:
    416
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #21
    Iggy stop with the disinfo, you know I did not say ALL were and you still keep trying to say I did.

    Keep lying and you will eventually believe it. Alex Jones needs you!
     
    debunked, Jul 17, 2008 IP
  2. iggysick

    iggysick Guest

    Messages:
    2,781
    Likes Received:
    64
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #22
    No you did not said it, you only implied that and I said that very clear. I dunno why do you hate catholics but it is more than obvious that you do. Otherwise you would not imply that all our priests are pedophiles. That's sick.
     
    iggysick, Jul 17, 2008 IP
  3. earthfaze

    earthfaze Peon

    Messages:
    765
    Likes Received:
    20
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #23
    Why are you cheerleading for the Taliban and Pakistani rebels? Do you think the Taliban has done a good job when they where in control of Afghanistan? If so why the hell is it still such a shitty place to hang out? If Pakistani rebels are so great why is that country going through all sorts of political turmoil and is incapable of controlling it's own borders? You can hate the US all you like but claiming that the Taliban are good is just nucking futs.
     
    earthfaze, Jul 17, 2008 IP
  4. webwork

    webwork Banned

    Messages:
    1,996
    Likes Received:
    47
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #24
    I don't think anyone said the Taliban is good, but is the condition of Afghanistan really our problem?

    As real dictators like Mugabe run their country into the ground, the US stands to the side yet we are so willing to send thousands of troops half way across the world to some desert shithole for what?

    Dolla dolla bills ya'll
     
    webwork, Jul 17, 2008 IP
  5. debunked

    debunked Prominent Member

    Messages:
    7,298
    Likes Received:
    416
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #25
    LOL...

    Do you have to lie about everyone you don't agree with?

    Why do you hate me, what did I do that made you hate me so much to try to lie about what I meant?

    oh well.... sad you have to lie so much. Truth is much easier to live by.
     
    debunked, Jul 18, 2008 IP
  6. bogart

    bogart Notable Member

    Messages:
    10,911
    Likes Received:
    509
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    235
    #26
    The Taliban attacked the US on 9/11 and 3,000 people were killed on sucide attacks on the World Trade Towers and Pentagon as well as the highjacked passenger jets.
     
    bogart, Jul 18, 2008 IP
  7. earthfaze

    earthfaze Peon

    Messages:
    765
    Likes Received:
    20
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #27
    Not to mention all the claims that we are the reason the Taliban got as powerful as they did. Doesn't that make it our mess to clean? I don't understand the argument of "well if you don't go to every war zone you shouldn't be in Afghanistan".
     
    earthfaze, Jul 18, 2008 IP
  8. wmghori

    wmghori Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,061
    Likes Received:
    14
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    160
    #28
    I had doubts but now its confirmed that you don't know jack about current affairs specially International.
     
    wmghori, Jul 18, 2008 IP
  9. earthfaze

    earthfaze Peon

    Messages:
    765
    Likes Received:
    20
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #29
    Why don't you refute what he says instead of just calling him uninformed, it would make this thread more interesting.
     
    earthfaze, Jul 18, 2008 IP
  10. wmghori

    wmghori Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,061
    Likes Received:
    14
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    160
    #30
    Anyone with common sense can guess that Taliban has nothing to do with 9-11.

    According to US govt. majority of the hijackers were Saudis (you can say al-Qaida is involved)

    Do you seriously think Taliban can hijack 4 airliners at the same time from 3 different airports with high security. I live in Karachi, Pakistan. Here my kid brother got stopped at the airport entrance because he had some metal in his shoes and this happened in 1993 when he was only 12. He also got stopped in 1986 at Bombay Airport, India because his middle name is 'Ibrahim' and there is a known gangster in India by the name of Dawood Ibrahim. We can't carry sissors or nail cutters in handcary, they have to goto lugage. These two third world countries has that much security in 80s and 90s that they don't even let through kids without scruitny or alow nail cutters in handcary how can 19 hijackers were allowed to sit in planes with weapons. If it was one plane I probably believed it that one airport's security staff was clumsy at their jobs but four at the same time from three different locations in USA. There has to be a lot of inside involvment from the airport security staff. Do we have any arrest of airport security staff?

    Besides according to FBI, they don't have proofs of OBL's involvement in 9-1. You can confirm that by calling them or visiting their site. Blamming Taliban is way out of the question.

    Do you remember Operation Northwood? If US can plan that in 60s to go on war with Cuba, don't you think they can execute the similar plan in 21st century for invading Afghanistan, Iraq etc. I guess we have to wait another 30-40 years before freedom of information act allows us to see who actually planned 9-11.
     
    wmghori, Jul 18, 2008 IP
  11. debunked

    debunked Prominent Member

    Messages:
    7,298
    Likes Received:
    416
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #31
    Actually most of what I have seen in our airport security are those who couldn't get hired by private corporations, so the only place they could get hired is by the government....

    Many are boneheads who also tend to have power trips. Sometimes it is hard to be respectful to them when they really shouldn't have a job like that in the first place.
     
    debunked, Jul 18, 2008 IP
  12. bogart

    bogart Notable Member

    Messages:
    10,911
    Likes Received:
    509
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    235
    #32
    Al Qaeda was intergral to the Taliban holding power in Afganistan. Al Qaeda supplied approx 12,000 fighters or the equilance of two brigades. One brigade was on the front against the Northern Allian and theother brigade in Kabul.

    Mullah Omar, the leader of the taliban, knew about the 9-11 attacks in the planning stages and gave his approval.

    Two days before the 9-11 attacks two suicide bombers posing as TV journalists murdered Ahmed Shah Massoud, the commander of the Northern Allaince.

    Faheem Dashty, an Afghan newspaper editor said "Al-Qaida, the Taliban, other terrorists, the Pakistan security services -- they were all working together and it was a plot to kill him."

    You're on b.s. mode. Before 9-11, I was in Dusseldorf airport and I set the metal detector off because I had a combat knife in my carry-on. It wasn't my fault. Because I had forgot about it and told the Police that it was a souvenir. They wanted to confiscate it but in the end gave me a small cargo transport bag that went into the luggage hold. Now I also had a 9 inch switch-blade in a jacket pocket that I had also forgot to take out. With that one I went onto the plane. It wasn't any big deal because I wasn't going to hijack the plane. But the knife went through.
     
    bogart, Jul 18, 2008 IP
  13. iggysick

    iggysick Guest

    Messages:
    2,781
    Likes Received:
    64
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #33
    Yes, you did imply that all catholic priest are pedophiles. Your exact words were: "Do you like to show your penis to little kids too? Are you catholic priest of later day properth?"
    Tell us again: what did you wanted to imply with those words?
    People like you are makes me puke.
     
    iggysick, Jul 18, 2008 IP
  14. wmghori

    wmghori Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,061
    Likes Received:
    14
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    160
    #34
    Yea, US govt. knows about the attacks too but they didn't do nothing. US demand of OBL after 9-11, Taliban response was show us the proof and we will give him to you. Don't you think US govt. should have showed the proof of his involvment and save us all from this war.
    Probably because he would have never agreed on US or NATO forces presense in Afghanistan. He had seen the presense of foreign forces in the country and knew that they don't leave without leaving the country in a mess.

    How can facts be b.s.?
    1. OBL is not wanted by FBI for 9-11.
    2. Operation Northwood was planned by US govt.

    You are even more brainwashed than those sucide bombers. By they way you should read Robert Pape's book 'Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism'.
     
    wmghori, Jul 18, 2008 IP
  15. bogart

    bogart Notable Member

    Messages:
    10,911
    Likes Received:
    509
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    235
    #35
    Osama Bin Laden is on the FBI top ten wanted list

    http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm

    Bin Laden also made a 9-11 confession video.
     
    bogart, Jul 19, 2008 IP
  16. webwork

    webwork Banned

    Messages:
    1,996
    Likes Received:
    47
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #36
    The argument is he's not on there for any crimes associated with 9/11. The reason being is there isn't enough evidence that point to OBL for these crimes.

    IMO this has been beaten to death, though.
     
    webwork, Jul 19, 2008 IP
  17. browntwn

    browntwn Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    8,347
    Likes Received:
    848
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    435
    #37
    Where do you get the idea that there is not enough evidence? It seems you took one fact (that he is not on the list for 9-11) and use it to make up your conclusion.

    Just because the FBI does not list someone on their site for a crime in no way means that there is not enough evidence. That is just the conclusion that uneducated people and terrorist supporters seem to try and push, even when they have no support for that conclusion.

    Perhaps the FBI does not consider 9-11 a crime for which he should be prosecuted, but rather a military attack which warrants a military response.
     
    browntwn, Jul 19, 2008 IP
  18. webwork

    webwork Banned

    Messages:
    1,996
    Likes Received:
    47
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #38
    Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI: “No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11”

    Come on Brown, this is really old.
     
    webwork, Jul 19, 2008 IP
  19. browntwn

    browntwn Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    8,347
    Likes Received:
    848
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    435
    #39
    Again, it is not a criminal matter and so evidence required for a Federal criminal indictment is not necessary. I do not expect to see Bin Laden indicted and tried in a Federal Court. I expect him to be captured or killed by the military, not the FBI, because it is not a mere criminal matter.

    Are you really so dense that in spite of his own admission, in spite of the reams of evidence, that you are going to cling to a statement which merely discusses Bin Laden in reference to a criminal indictment. While the acts could be Federal Crimes they are much more and will be treated as such by my government.

    If the there is no criminal indictment in Federal Court does the FBI ever list the crime?
     
    browntwn, Jul 19, 2008 IP
  20. webwork

    webwork Banned

    Messages:
    1,996
    Likes Received:
    47
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #40
    LOL you can expect to see OBL captured, but I know better.

    OBL is the million dollar scapegoat. Anytime America needs to get the public afraid, they have their trusty "Fear of Terrorism featuring Obama Bin Laden" episode they can play over and over again.

    Why would they get rid of him? He's a political goldmine.

    BTW, can you point me to an Bin Laden admission that is NOT fake? They have been doing this for a long time.
     
    webwork, Jul 19, 2008 IP