Truth Rising 9/11 terrorist US launches retaliatory strikes in the Middle East.

Umm. You posted a link to an EDITORIAL(oh fuck your sledgehammer inclinations are starting to RUB OFF!!!).
Who the fuck is Eric Margolis and WTF is bigeye.com?

I googled his name and see a bunch of links to antiwar.com and lewrockwell.com(buy guerilla's crap much?) .

http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&q="Eric+Margolis"&btnG=Search

I'm not going to read shit like that. I could dig up editorials from people to support any view I want. If you're going to post stuff post stuff from the main stream media(I know this will bother the Alex Jones freaks, but oh well, sometimes reality is required) that includes real reporting and not just editorials.


I thought maybe reducing things to pictures could help us understand our differences. Sorry I couldn't find a shinier tack to use.



Because of this unfortunate incompatibility of our styles and the way we try to understand world problems, I'm afraid we will keep going over and over the same ground.

 

I stated a 1 second search of google, I KNEW you'd take issue with the source. The source DOES NOT matter, it was more for the words so that you could search yourself.

Dude get a fucking grip and a life.

As I stated!

Clearly stating a quick search of google to simply give you the basics! I did not give a shit about the source as it's COMMON knowledge to anyone who gives a damn, you know someone unlike you!

You claim I am 'sledge hammer' yet I know more about what's going on and what went on than you, what does that make you, the needle in the hay stack?

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Glaspie

Do you need me to hold it for you while you pee as well?

 

A bit of a ham-fisted metaphorical retort there. I could say that this metaphor was produced through a sledgehammer and tack approach to viewing and solving intellectual(and otherwise) problems but that would be a somewhat recursive reference and I'm afraid your head might explode.

 

You know what's funny? For someone who has absolutely no clue 'you' you have the balls to think you're smarter than me.

That is hilarious!

 

Is that what you're talking about? Or are you talking about the quote that stated that we didn't want to get in between a border dispute? Do you think we knew the madman was going to invade? How do you equate not wanting to get into a border dispute before an invasion with giving the go ahead?

 

#1 I said 'many' not ME.
#2 You have selective reading abilities don't you?

Ahh fuck I'll hold that little bitty thing for you one last time.

 

I have no clue because I don't buy the garbage from propagandists(one of which is probably posting as we speak) or because I don't use the assertions of dictators to criticize my government?

 

Ahh but you believe everything of the government.

Yet again I don't use 'propaganda' so sorry, try again.

The only assertion used was to criticize your piss poor logic, not the government

 

No I do not. But I don't automatically assume we are in the wrong.
Even when the government isn't straight with us it isn't necessarily because they have evil intentions. It's because any message they put out or espouse is bound to be filtered and dumbed down through the media into sound bites. This is where the ability for nuance and seeing shades of gray comes into play.

So far you've only linked to fringe editorials(except for wikipedia) from people who have a political ax to grind.

 

What do you not get about it's what she said! FFS dude get the finger out of your ass for a second, I did a QUICK search to simply give you the words!

You seriously can not be this idiotic, can you?

-
Let me speak S L O W L Y

I searched G O O G L E to get the words, I gave you the quote and the link. I DID NOT CARE who the source was as it DOES NOT matter it is simply for the words for you to search and learn!


But nope, lets turn it around like a brain dead moron and harp on the source.

There are millions of results for the words, google, USE IT!

 

Maybe you shouldn't believe all anti-US crap from the first source you stumble upon then?

 

Maybe he should just put you on ignore, where most of the crap belongs.

 

It's not 'anti-us' crap it's the TRUTH, it's also something I knew about before getting you the exact words.

Nice try on spinning it.

I told you from the get go it was A QUICK SEARCH to simply give you the words.



I see you have no point, no facts, no debate strategy, you remind me a lot of someone else who used to post here, just as bad, just as idiotic.

 

Go ahead. I'll keep you off ignore so I can see when you insult people's family members by calling them murderers instead of decently arguing a point.

 

Knock yourself out. Our days together are numbered.

 

Ahh pot calling kettle black, when are you going to decently argue a point instead of twisting and dodging, and lying?

 

No idea what that means.

 

Fringe editorials and all the anti-us propaganda in where most of conspiracy theory information comes from. They can't come up with factual information to defend al-Qaeda and Taliban terrorist or Iraq’s involvement with terrorist.

 

Did you bother reading anything or are you simply grasping onto 'flux' stating over and over about a supposed fringe article, one that was listed only to give the quotes of an ambassador, nothing more, nothing less.