just wondering what is the seo idea behind what you did ? nobody is going to link to you.. so you will get some social bookmarking traffic - useless traffic. the bottom line is digging an article that won't interest a lot of people equals useless traffic, nothing more.
If you don't get that much traffic, then how come you are sharing a guide on how to get more traffic? "I dont get a whole lot of traffic I thought I would share it with you guys" "technique that will really boost your SEO efforts and your traffic"
Good information fellow, but can you tell us which of the article sites are best and fastest to grow in terms of traffic and page rank. Thank you bro.
Digg traffic is short term. Eventually you will rank well directly in the search engines because the keyword is so uncompetitive. Once this occurs you will have traffic specifically looking for infomation on a keyword coming to your site and if you have chosen a related keyword its quality traffic. But if you dont like it dont use it just means one less competitor for everyone else.
Yeah poorly worded that is for sure. I havent used this technique on the website the article is published because I find it difficult to use related keywords. It certainly takes away my authority on the subject by using the disclaimer beforehand. Actually I am going to remove it.
That's for sure, especially now with the added feature of number of searches in Google Tool, if you compare the numbers, Wordtracker and Keyword Discovery and even SEOBook Free KW Tool figures are completely off! The difference in results is staggering!!!
I think that for the four tips given, I consider the number 3 the best. Writing good articles for both humans and search engines is the real SEO. I agree when someone here says Digg is only temporary. It is for matinée idols, not for actors. They are of different categories, you know.