do you think soldiers are heroes or the losers ?

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by 7point4, Jul 8, 2008.

?

what do you think of a soldiers (anonymous poll)

  1. heroes

    23 vote(s)
    65.7%
  2. losers

    7 vote(s)
    20.0%
  3. not sure

    5 vote(s)
    14.3%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. LogicFlux

    LogicFlux Peon

    Messages:
    2,925
    Likes Received:
    102
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #61
    That's funny, you said I seemed like a smart person yesterday before you edited your post. Didn't think I was looking?
     
    LogicFlux, Jul 13, 2008 IP
  2. atvking

    atvking Active Member

    Messages:
    749
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #62
    youre ever so conveniently forgetting that its always the US army on foreign soil and not the other way round

    so when you say "start wars" and the wars are on other peoples soil + your bombs and army it KINDA makes people wonder? sure we started a war on our own soil cause we had nothing better to do that day than fight the #1 military superpower + their puppet allies

    also there is no doubt in every young boys mind who is to blame for him being force drafted..."the americans are coming to bomb" KINDA leaves you looking like the war mongers eh?

    oh and my point still stands: patriotism = 1200$/month ...take away the $$$ and the ideals melt and fade away...you can still tap yourselves on the back and pretend to be "heroes" im sure that inside the USA you will always find somebody to listen to the heroic war stories of how you could not score a job at mcdonalds so you became a hired mercenary instead...

    or let me spell it out real simple: if i pay a woman 1200$/month to be with me is it true love?
     
    atvking, Jul 14, 2008 IP
  3. guerilla

    guerilla Notable Member

    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #63
    If you put half as much energy into looking at post edits into being sincere in a discussion...

    But like you've written, you don't take any of this seriously.

    Which is why when you say you "believe" that the economy is not in serious trouble, not knowing why specifically you believe that, it's either ignorance or indifference. Both of which I have little time for.
     
    guerilla, Jul 14, 2008 IP
  4. northpointaiki

    northpointaiki Guest

    Messages:
    6,876
    Likes Received:
    187
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #64
    Just came across this. What I want to say would get me banned. What burns inside my chest right now would get me far worse. Suffice it to say I've had it with your personal attacks on my family, Guerilla. My brother was an honorable vet who endured hell during the war, and for the rest of his life after. He recently died, so, no, I'm not really in the mood.
     
    northpointaiki, Jul 14, 2008 IP
  5. bogart

    bogart Notable Member

    Messages:
    10,911
    Likes Received:
    509
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    235
    #65
    A lot of people don't remember the Fall of Saigon where there were millions fleeing or in boats. The fall of Cambodia was worse and resulted in the 'killing fields' where the communits murdered 1 million people out of a population of 6 million.
     
    bogart, Jul 14, 2008 IP
  6. 7point4

    7point4 Guest

    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #66
    interesting, i must say- I'm here with guerrilla and others anti-war pipl, just that i have expressed my view already, few years ago, when Iraq just started


    this is a big shame- that the majority of wordls population are war-supporters, nothing you can do here really at this point, as simply intelligent worlds population is a much smaller than the thick one

    i believe all suffering and end to all wars should come from education, to get people educated we need money

    money better to be spent on providing free education, than on training/sponsoring the "fighting force"

    my view..


    now where are the war's money comes from :confused:
    isn't that from a screwy business men, who controls wars businesses
     
    7point4, Jul 14, 2008 IP
  7. guerilla

    guerilla Notable Member

    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #67
    Right, but you cheerlead and justify the war which causes this. We had no business in Vietnam. We lost tens of thousands, the South Asians died in the millions, and we destroyed our economy. For what?

    For nothing, but the endless blood lust and fanaticism of some cold warrior chickenhawks.

    I got a warning for a personal something or other.

    I'm not the one who brings up my family to spite someone else.

    I'm sorry your brother passed as I am sorry for everyone who passes, but your attitude about the military and war really doesn't reflect any sort of maturity of opinion on the topic of violence.

    Killing is wrong, no matter who does it.
     
    guerilla, Jul 14, 2008 IP
  8. 7point4

    7point4 Guest

    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #68
    i found out, Iraqs war money mainly comes from China??

    US sells some "Treasury Bonds" to support war, mainly china's buying

    source

    does anyone familiar :confused:
     
    7point4, Jul 14, 2008 IP
  9. northpointaiki

    northpointaiki Guest

    Messages:
    6,876
    Likes Received:
    187
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #69
    Stop. The "something or other," as you well know, was to personally attack my family - a man you wouldn't have the chance in hell of knowing - by naming him a murderer, and a war criminal. DO NOT KEEP GOING.

    The link you misnamed states this:

    I'm holding my tongue. I would normally laugh at the notion of your telling me - a guy on his own from 14, a father, a veteran, a man who lived under the direct tutelage of a zen and martial ways master - my level of "maturity on the subject of violence." Whether a thread devoted to discussion in honor of Gandhi's ethos, or the many threads I have made quite clear the following:

    To hear you, of all people, speak to me on "maturity" of any kind would normally bring me to laugh.

    But I'm not laughing any more. Do not mention my brother again - ever. Do not preach to me anything, actually - your arrogance and gross misapprehensions notwithstanding, do not use any tactic you customarily use: misstatements and misrepresentations of my views of war, my views on anything, to make the attempt to further your agenda, ever again.

    To all others, who sit in silence while this kind of thing is spewed, but who voice objections left and right otherwise - shame on you.
     
    northpointaiki, Jul 14, 2008 IP
  10. guerilla

    guerilla Notable Member

    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #70
    I wouldn't have a chance in hell of knowing him, if you were not bringing him and his service up on this forum, repeatedly. You've got dozens of posts at least where you glorify the military.

    Censorship and bullying won't obscure what is.

    Killing is wrong, no matter who does it. And last time I checked, the Vietnamese did not attack America (Tonkin incident).
     
    guerilla, Jul 14, 2008 IP
  11. usasportstraining

    usasportstraining Notable Member

    Messages:
    4,876
    Likes Received:
    363
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Articles:
    4
    #71
    That's NOT what is reads.

    Work

    Work in Iraq pays very well. Typical foreign contractors can make up to $100k per year for security and admin work.



    Contractors could make about $100K per year. Not the soldiers. Enlisted soldiers make about $12-20K per year.

    Officers could make much more, but most are nowhere near $100K per year.
     
    usasportstraining, Jul 14, 2008 IP
    buffalo likes this.
  12. northpointaiki

    northpointaiki Guest

    Messages:
    6,876
    Likes Received:
    187
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #72
    You are lying. I am not laughing. I believe I have mentioned my brother once before you specifically, directly and personally attacked his memory with this thread, and I have never glorified war. Quite the opposite.

    I have served; simply enough, I am a vet. I will not spit on vets, and if that is "glorifying" something unjust in your mind, this is your problem.

    You must stop. It angers me that I should even have to post this, but again, here's my essence on the subject:


    A D-Day memorial thread
    .

    I want a world of peace, and grieve that our species has been at its opposite for so long. Your usual attempts are simply no longer funny, Guerilla.
     
    northpointaiki, Jul 14, 2008 IP
  13. wisdomtool

    wisdomtool Moderator Staff

    Messages:
    15,825
    Likes Received:
    1,367
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    455
    #73
    I was a soldier, so I think I need a disclaimer, I am not completely unbiased in this thread. I vote for "Not Sure". A soldier's responsibility is obedience to the orders given. If orders are given for you to shoot, you shoot. It is part of discipline and training.

    A soldier is like a tool in the hands of the political masters. Millions of soldiers died bravely for the defense of their homeland, some without even the means of a proper burial. There is no doubt that during peace time, soldiers as a profession are paid higher than average. By that I mean someone with similar qualifications will normally get higher pay than in the civilian sector due to the risks involve and also the lose of freedom as a soldier.

    Are soldiers heroes? Well it depends a lot on the situation, if you are being invaded, you protect your countries, yes, you are the heroes. Other than that, are they losers? I find it hard to answer. The responsibilities lies with the political leaders. As a soldier when you are asked to shoot you shoot, soldiers and civilians alike when the order is given. I guess a lot will disagree with me, but this is part of the training, unpleasant as it is. They are performing their duties, against their conscience maybe, but it is their duties as such. I am not talking about the errant soldiers who rape and burn. Just a regular soldier.

    I don't wish to push away the responsibilities, but an army is effective only when it can follow orders, there is no rights or wrongs in war. I guess war by itself is wrong. It is hard to diffuse the responsibilities down to the private or corporals or section commanders and the likes. Sure it is easy to say they are losers for following immoral orders. But IMHO, a soldier in an army is a tool, an army is a pawn at the hands of its political masters. They are doing their jobs, that's it.
     
    wisdomtool, Jul 14, 2008 IP
  14. guerilla

    guerilla Notable Member

    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #74
    Great! What are you doing about it?
     
    guerilla, Jul 14, 2008 IP
  15. guerilla

    guerilla Notable Member

    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #75
    WT, sensible post as usual. I do however disagree with one aspect. If you know the war you are going to fight is wrong, and you still go voluntarily, then you can't say you were just following orders. You made a conscious decision to participate in something which you knew was illegal.

    In the case of Vietnam, the draft complicates things. I don't believe in a draft, and I certainly don't think people drafted always had an option, although I applaud those who left rather than participate what was obviously now a contrived war that had nothing to do with national defense.

    And on the subject of defense, I think this is a legitimate role for a soldier. Not offense. Offensive, aggressive war is a war crime.
     
    guerilla, Jul 14, 2008 IP
  16. northpointaiki

    northpointaiki Guest

    Messages:
    6,876
    Likes Received:
    187
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #76
    Plenty, and none of your %^%$#$ business. You want to play sandbox games, that's fine - but you have crossed the line, once too many times, Guerilla.

    And oh, for the love of Christ, will the pandering ever stop? I agree with Wisdom as well - and I would guess, both of us having served, we share many similar sentiments. But there is nothing in what he said that you have not utterly condemned by your point of view - most personally, and most egregiously, for me, to call my brother a murderer and a war criminal because he served in Vietnam.

    No one is fooled any longer. Go away, Guerilla.
     
    northpointaiki, Jul 14, 2008 IP
  17. guerilla

    guerilla Notable Member

    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #77
    Maybe you should update your sig and location fields to properly reflect the level of your outrage and disgust! :rolleyes:

    I am happy you are doing plenty. It's very inspiring.
     
    guerilla, Jul 14, 2008 IP
  18. 7point4

    7point4 Guest

    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #78
    yea, it sounds a bit ..err- communistic ??

    simply looks like the pain of unfortunate loss of his brother has affected productive part of the brain

    this is understandable and most importantly - curable

    best of luck
     
    7point4, Jul 14, 2008 IP
  19. GRIM

    GRIM Prominent Member

    Messages:
    12,638
    Likes Received:
    733
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #79
    Soldiers by and large deserve respect IMO. You CAN NOT blame them when they are simply following orders, they are doing their job and duty, even if it's not in direct protection of our great nation.

    Unless they themselves disobey direct orders and or commit war crimes against laid out protocol of the military it is not the individual soldier you should blame, but those in charge of the soldier, all the way up to the Commander and Chief.

    Vietnam, many of the soldiers did not even want to be there, they were forced into. Even so that does not change who is in charge, who should get blame and take responsibility.

    Even if the war is not a 'just' war, even if you do not support the war, you should back the soldiers and be proud of them. I know I am, even in Iraq which I am firmly against, it does not stop me from talking to the soldiers as they return, shaking their hands and telling them I am proud of them. Listening to their side of things, even if they are pro war, IMO they earned it.
     
    GRIM, Jul 14, 2008 IP
  20. wisdomtool

    wisdomtool Moderator Staff

    Messages:
    15,825
    Likes Received:
    1,367
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    455
    #80
    IMHO, as a soldier you really do not get to choose what is right or wrong. When there is a war it has to be fought and won. When you are in military uniforms, you are following orders, there is no conscious decisions at all. You pull the trigger when the orders are given.

    When you are a soldier, your duty is to obey, defensive or offensive wars, you are fighting for your nation. You die for your nation if you have to. Offensive or defensive wars, a soldier fights for his nation. An army will go where the commander ask it to go, where ever it is. It is part of the training, military do not operate as individuals but as a collective whole, only then is there an army capable of fighting. As a normal soldier, you do not get to choose when you are fighting and where you are fighting. As long as you performed your duties, killed and be killed, you fulfill your own destiny.

    You can consider me brain washed, but if I am still a soldier in uniform and if I am killed fighting a war, offensive or defensive. I would consider it an honor to die for my country.


    Add on - I would agree with what Grim said above.



     
    wisdomtool, Jul 14, 2008 IP
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.