Story: Why Christians SUCK as Newscasters : Tyson Homosexual Olympics You can still see the Google results here even though OneNewsNow has edited the story...
Oh yeah, especially since the story is spreading like wildfire on the blogs. I'll bet it makes the news or at least late night comedy... Bill Mahr would have a field day with this one... I wonder if he can file a lawsuit against them for it ???
What funny is how childish the atheists act and make themselves to be as right wing as the christian fundamentalist they are always attacking. Like the pot calling the kettle black. gets kind of boring after a while.
wha ha, funny http://bp0.blogger.com/_1OMiSrEJXnY/SGjvgemRW3I/AAAAAAAAHpM/mvisr0Lrw1o/s1600-h/gay.jpg bet the guy nicknamed "tyson homosexual" now
No what's really funny is how the christians like to sweep the fact that they are frightened of certain words under the carpet and try to change the subject to something about atheists. The thread isn't about atheists, its about christians having to change reality because it makes them frightened.
I was thinking the exact same thing stOx. It's just like how all the Neo-Cons always try to turn every debate into a liberal bashing. @pingpong123 - Nobody was attacking Christians, this discussion is about real facts that exemplify why people tied to religious organizations should not disseminate news. I would say the same thing about the obiously slanted Musim and Jewish news sources as well. When people mix religion with current events they get potent mix guaranteed to cause collusion steeped in ignorance. News should be delivered objectively. Any form of "editing filter" applied by a news source makes them less than credible. @gauharjk - You really need to get an education buddy. This topic was not started to discuss the particulars of the gay lifestyle or if being gay is due to nature or nuture. It was started to discuss random editing of news stories to fit a quasi-political religious agenda.
True but the thread was made with a hidden agenda by Atheists who arent able to look at their own biases and faults in the mirror. I think some cant see themselves as the world sees them. I have critisized fundamentalist from all religions but dont forget there are also fundamentalist Atheists out there.
um, before you get all high and mighty (while you have casino links in your signature), I would like to know why you are wrongfully accusing me of being an Atheist ? I honestly take insult to that because I am an Episcopalian and in no way shape or form was this thread created with a "hidden agenda", so, that said.... Once again, you are drifting far. far away from the real topic and that topic is that news sources should not use filtering or editing software. If you can relax your mind for half a second and quit trying to turn this thread into a partisan religious discussion you might see that this thread isn't about you or your beliefs at all, it's about censorship. thanks for the insults..
I guess you think all homosexuals suffer a mental disease. I think maybe you have been at one too many of those racist sites.
Wow, i dont know how u got that i insulted you. Please show me where i pointed u out. A little paranoid arent we, and if u knew the story behind my signature links u would understand that these arent mine anymore and they are for a very worthy cause. Also if you understood jesus christ and what he stood for you would understand that in our faith we arent supposed to be mechanical christians. Remember that jesus healed people on the sabbath which was against the law in judaism. usually when people are that sensitive its a problem with them. Look im agreeing with you about the dessiminating news part but im also pointing out that atheists also have a bias and also shouldnt be dessimminating news The show has to go on both feet shouldnt it?
You said that the thread was started by Atheists with a hidden agenda. He pointed out that he started the thread, he is not an Atheist, and he does not have some hidden agenda. In other words, you took your own knee-jerk bias and applied it to the OP, when it has no basis in fact.