Is this site breaking TOS?

can see a giv image on this site?
http://www.smsfunonline.com/category/joke-and-funny-sms/

Is it breaking TOS?

 

That is a pretty hard question. That can mean anything. Im pretty sure it means click the ads, but if they ask him he can say a totally different thing. So im not really sure.

 

Are you talking about the animated gif that points to the google ads?

 

Yes
thats smart idea though

 

"Thou Shalt Not Draw Undue Attention to Thy Ads."

 

Yepp, this site is breaking TOS.

once i had arrows (>>) alng with adsense on one of my sites, and I mailed google to ask whether it is okay or not, they said, I can not draw attention by any means to the ads, thus its not okay.

putting gif like that is violation of TOS,for sure

 

yeah sure is. I seen that pic on another page before and I saved it cuz it was funny lol. I wouldn't use it on my ads but maybe something else someday.

 

Maybe you can use it when the guy don't poniting to the ads. I changed the gif a little, see attached file. But don't risk your account, better ask google about!

 

Very clear case of "Drawing Undue Attention to Thy Ads", hence I think its breaking TOS of google.

 

It is quite inventive... I will give it that!

 

they could argue that it's part of the site. who knows i wouldn't wanna deal with the headache.

 

lol. what a cute animated gif. Too bad it is pointing straight at the "Ads by Google"

 

Look at the site again, guys.

 

A little OT, but does anyone know where I can get one of those 'post it' in the right hand corner? I want one, I want one!

 

Make one... It's just an image.

 

Mia, I think it is some sort of pop up...you can click it off..does anyone know how to do this, or can point me in the right direction?

 

Go to: http://www.smsfunonline.com/category/joke-and-funny-sms/

Then "view source".

 

http://www.adimpact.com/

 

Thanks, dude.

So, mia, do you think I can just use the same JS and create my own image? Sorry if this is all beneath you, but me no webby internet stuff so good.

 

That was what I was implying, that given time you could certainly figure it out by copying (I hate using that word) borrowing from what was done. However, thanx to AboutITWorld's link, I would probably go that route as it looks like a ready made solution. Would make things easier/quicker!

Good luck!