Hi, I found an article on the internet that talks about the Google Alogarithm, this is what they said: GoogScore = (KW Usage Score * 0.3) + (Domain Strength * 0.25) + (Inbound Link Score * 0.25) + (User Data * 0.1) + (Content Quality Score * 0.1) + (Manual Boosts) - (Automated & Manual Penalties) KW Usage Factors: * KW in title tag * KW in header tags * KW in document text * KW in internal links pointing to the page * KW in domain and/or URL Domain Strength * Registration history * Domain age * Strength of links pointing to the domain * Topical neighborhood of domain based on inlinks & outlinks * Historical use & links pattern to domain Inbound Link Score * Age of links * Quality of domains sending links * Quality of pages sending links * Anchor text of links * Link quantity/weight metric (Pagerank or a variation) * Subject matter of linking pages/sites User Data * Historical CTR to page in SERPs * Time users spend on page * Search requests for URL/domain * Historical visits/use of URL/domain by users GG can monitor (toolbar, wifi, analytics, etc.) Content Quality Score * Potentially given by hand for popular queries/pages * Provided by Google raters * Machine-algos for rating text quality/readability/etc what you all think about it? is it official? , or is just another hypothesis... Thanks
The only way to test this stuff would be with controlled experiments. I think the best way would be to invent fictitious niches, using pseudo-words that aren't actually in the English language, or words that are very rarely used. That way you avoid confounding factors caused by other people competing in your test space. Set up a bunch of sites and vary each parameter, and see what happens. Could be very interesting actually. I am sure someone must be doing this (probably someone at Yahoo or MSN).
Its nothing but speculation. HOWEVER, if you are going to copy and past others work here, you should at least include a link to the source; if not get permission to reproduce it (?moderators?)
Hi, I think that will be pretty good to try this experiment with different URLs, and about the copy paste, I didn't want to put links because the article was post it in my article directory I though that I could receive infractions for that. and because of that I didn't put a link to the article. Thanks
I don't know whether it is good or not , but i will sure give it a try may be if this worked pr and serp get some promotions .
Thios is the traditional work that every SEO expert do here as basic work but none of them have revealed how they do the SEO work?
If the Google algorithm was officially out, everyone would know about the use upon the second of its disclosure.
Yes all the things here are basic can you please give a link to the site where the original article was posted.
I am always interested to Read the Articles of SEOMOZ, Randfish has published this Article in SEOMOZ (10/16/06) and also He is the member of DP Forum , http://forums.digitalpoint.com/member.php?u=1111 Here is the URL of complete Article :- http://www.seomoz.org/blog/a-little-piece-of-the-google-algorithm-revealed @romioaa, you should put always original Author URL so every members can Read complete Article but why are you not ? Thanks John
as I said this article was posted in my website for one of my members so I didn't wanted to put my own site. I thought that was against the rules.
You first said: and now you are saying: Which is it? Are you being totally honest? Regardless, if you are cutting and pasting its not good form to not acknowledge the author and source. If I found anything I wrote posted in a forum without acknowledgement, at the very least I would be very angry; at worse I would start legal action for copyright infringement.
gotta agree looks a bit basic. It probably is something more than a few calculations, or at least google wants to present it as something more.