Google Never Happy with these Step in Websites?

1) Hidden Text
2) Buying Links
3) Cloaking
4)Duplicate Content
5)Link Exchanges
(Two-way link exchanges won’t get you banned, but it won’t help you any either.)
6)Keyword Stuffing
7)Link Farms
(Link farms are sites whose only purpose is to artificially inflate link popularity through link exchanges. Google knows who they are, and if they’re not on their list yet, you can bet they will be soon. They’re considered “bad neighborhoods”, and will hurt your rankings.)

So what better a way to show you the dangers of bad SEO than to share some real-life examples?

Recently very good Example is famous blog V7N SEO Banned From Google Spam Team.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&q=http://blog.v7n.com

they were contacted by Google who said they would be temporarily removed from the index, not banned, but I’m going to go ahead and call bullshit on this one.

(Source From Julie Kent :searchenginejournal.com/bad-seo-techniques-that-will-hurt-your-google-rankings/7065/ )

Please share your comments with Blacker SEO Steps which google Don't want in Every websites.

Thanks
John

 

I didn't think link exchanges were bad.

 

how u mean link exchanges are bad.....it serves as the basis for the PR algorithm....doesnt it??? votes from one site to another.....even if its 2 way...i dont think its bad at all....

 

I can PROVE you wrong on like 5 of 7 things.
OUT RIGHT..... PROVE YOU WRONG.
PROVE
Use your head. Please, not your heart.
Until you have tested EACH thing 100% yourself. BY ITSELF, dont comment.
HAVE YOU TESTED BUYING LINKS. I'll guess no. It works for SO many people.
Do me a favor. Dont reply as I wont write back and you'll waste your precious time.
TEST THESE THINGS. And you'll be suprised what "works".
T E S T T H E M - Dont be a google sheep.
BAAAAAAAH

 

Baaaaah???? :|

 

LOL that was a nice one.

 

I have a site with 15,000 uniques per day with almost exclusively 2-way link exchanges.

 

I Think Reciprocal Link Exchange Is Not A Problem With Google. But You Can Consider Three-way Link Exchange...

 

Thanks for sharing nice info, John.

well let me tell you, if you are getting pr 5 link in rewards of pr 2 link than it will be highly appriciated.

well, one more thing is that you are getting business traffic only from these kind of link exchanges.

 

2 way link exchange is bad, specially if done mass

 

2 Way Linking in not BAD !!! but it wont help the same as One Way.

 

School days stuff

1) Hidden Text -----true
2) Buying Links -----In between true and false (both are correct )
3) Cloaking ----- true
4)Duplicate Content ------ true
5)Link Exchanges --------false
(Two-way link exchanges won’t get you banned, but it won’t help you any either.)
6)Keyword Stuffing --------true
7)Link Farms -----------true

mine added.....


changing metas more frequently

no permanent redirecting

Bahhhhhhhhhh

 

Friends

I was very interested to get the answers from DP Members about these Steps of article but Please Note this is not my Philosophy about link Exchanges is Bad or Good. but Please read this Article from Search Engine Journal Team and which i specified this source in my first post.

Search engine Journal Author said like this "Two-way link exchanges won’t get you banned, but it won’t help you any either". if LE is Not Bad technique in your site but its also not better Technique in REAL SEO.

www.searchenginejournal.com/bad-seo-techniques-that-will-hurt-your-google-rankings/7065/

Thanks for your interest in LE Technique.

John

 

What you've proved in SEO Industry and What you will Prove in Real SEO ??

Reply me with Examples of those 5 Things which you can Prove Wrong ???

Let me know all the five points if you are real SEO Person.

Otherwise leave it and Hit the Mouse in your Head so you will get quickly answers of those 5 things.

Thanks
John

 

this is the best thing written in this post I feel, there are too many people saying or repeating rumours and saying it like it's one of the 10 commandments.

I have personally know of sites that have committed many of these Supposed SEO crimes, many still do I would imagine, and it's never hurt their ranking, they have never been banned, or anything happen to them.

Now remember I'm only talking about sites I have been to in the past 8 years, and often written to the owners and become friends with them.

I have also know of one site in particular that hasn't changed any of the main pages on it's site in the past 7 years, it's not done any link building, and yet it still ranks highly for several keywords etc.

I'm not in anyway suggesting anyone should do any of these generally believed blackhat SEO techiques, I'm just saying that one shouldn't make sweeping statments and act like they are authorities on a subject unless they actually are and have their own experience to back them up.

Cheers Lynny

 

Link Exchanging With Related Site Is Not Bad Maaaaaaannnnnnn................

But Only With Related Sites....

 

I agree with all

These are considered in black hat techniques by the Google, But about Two way Link Exchange i do not think so it is penalize by the Google.

 

and what about 3 way links (related sites)? any comments!

 

I will not say that someone is right or wrong.. BUT..

I really, really wonder.. how the hell could google know if link is bought or not?

Even if I buy a domain "IbuyLinks.Com" and link it from PR 6 unrelated websites, how the hell can they know for sure? Or do you guys think they will penalize even the slightest suspicion?

I really can't see any way to know anything about bought links other than hiring a full legion of surfers to read thru 10000 of forums and act as cyber detectives?

Correct me if I'm missing out on something, but look at it like - YOU are GOOGLE. YOU want to fight vs bought links - where would you start?

I'm also extreeeeeeemly curious about that one.. been hearing about it from day #1 in this business.. and at the same time some of my most visited blog news are direct copy/pastes from wikipedia (yup, google traffic).

Also..

Unless site A copies site B completely (but really like 100% copy, not just the main text, but sidebars, main menu, etc) then I'd say - yeah, google will get it.. but all those article copies stories and such.. how?

Once again, I won't say anyone is wrong - I'm just sharing my view on it all - but how can google tell copied content? I do know google uses top notch technology and all that but wow.. they would have to have millions of servers just rotating and comparing sites 24/7 - and EVEN if they do somehow pull it of, the eternal question remains - did I copy you or you copied me, how to figure that out?

Etc etc..

 

SIK.... Couldn't agree more.

One point to add to this copying thing, the powers that be say write good content, and people will link to it, yeah right sure they will, more likely they will read it, and copy and paste it to their own website.

I used to check out my website on copyscape for a while, and have seen whole pages of my writing copied on other websites, I have written to the website owners, asked them to remove it, and usally get told to go get F$%& prove that I wrote it first.

I have to wonder how many of the visitors I have to my website are just there to steal stuff, I bet it would be a high proportion if truth be known.

I once even saw a forum post I had written, on another forum I went to under someone elses name lol...

Cheers Lynn