Saudi prince: If Israel quits Arab land, it could join Arab world

At least you know there is another side to the story unlike others...

 

this is confusing, I said the other side of the story, that Arabs do not want to kill all Jews, the story was Arabs or Muslims want to kill all Jews.

much like Arabs always attack Israel in wars.

 

ok I see, so at least I know the other side of the story

 

which is?..

 

peace is coming, Israeli and Palestinians have to work together to make it a good and lasting one

 

I think I lost it at some point, but if you meant that you know that Arabs do not want to kill all Jews, then good, in anyway, thanks for the talk

 

Assuming HAMASS leaves, peace is inevitable.

 

I'm sure Israel will find someone else to start a fight with

 

this is only posturing and counterproductive.
ultimatly if israel is intrested in her own security through peace. she must involve hamas. there is no benefit in any peace for israel if it is not with all palestanians.
the biggest obstacle to the peace is that even people that want peace are silent because they are not sure if it works.
they must change the politics in ME from how to stop this peace process to how we can make it work.

 

Nothing posturing about it... We've learned through painful experience that you cannot negotiate with terrorists. HAMASS (I think they call themselves that because they really like Ham) does not want peace. That much is clear. And while they remain the controlling force in the region, there will be no peace.

This is some pretty rudimentary stuff here.

 

Was there peace before Hamas got in power?

 

we know that policy of not talking does not work. look at cuba
we know talking and friendship works. look at the turn around in iraq
if rumsfeld was in charge we still wouldn't be talking with the sunnis and it would have been a huge mess. now this is some pretty rudimentary stuff here

 

Was there peace in Palestine? before the Zionist state was formed in Plaestine? YES!

So, we know the problem is the Zionists.

 

Do you smoke crack? This is a serious question.. Do you?

The "turn around in Iraq?"

You do realize it is Bush Policy that is responsible for the progress in Iraq, not talking. Killing retards from Iran and Syria that seek to overturn the peace process is what has been responsible for Iraq's progress, not talking.

The fact that you actually admit there is progress in Iraq is quite alarming considering your usual posts. I suppose if Obama were elected you'd believe he were suddenly responsible for the "turn around"... What a laugh.

 

you said that there is a progress in iwreck. you are the one that might be smoking crack.
the policy that improved the iraq was the deals that they made with sunni groups and local trtibes. the same people that were shooting at the troops.
talking and cooperation has lead to inprovment in the security in iraq
so what part of this you don't understand.
you can not even keep track of the crap you say
and yes if the iraq situation is improved after bush leaving office the credit goes to the next president. he can always pull out before he leaves the office if he thinks it i done

 

^ “It's not denial. I'm just selective about the reality I accept.”

Bill Watterson

 

reality is an always changing equation. you ideas and way of thinking is old and stale we need a fresh new and dynamic approach in our foreign policy
bush and neocons have nothing to show other than failure.

 

Yes, we need CHANGE... Vote Osamabinbama... Teddy's best bud!

 

the fact that every one in the adminestration has to retire from politics is testimony to their failure. if chaney had one hair of any kennedy it would have been a tremendous improvment.