Earl has no credible counter-argument. He's a Clinton supporter who can't afford to distance himself from the 500,000 children Bill killed with Food for Oil. I'm waiting for a credible counter-argument for you wasting the stimulus check on consumer spending, acting like you're straight from the trailer park and picked a winning lottery ticket. Your "stimulus" is borrowed against the national debt. Your children will be taxed to pay the interest on it for the rest of their lives. If the country doesn't collapse under the weight of supporting your retirement and health entitlements first. But hey, you're so greedy, you'd ask someone else for their check, so you can blow it on entertainment or crap you don't need. *oink* *oink*
Firstly, in your knee-spasm, you misread what was actually written. I paid bills with the check. Secondly, none of your fucking business what I or anyone else does with the check. Thirdly, Earl routinely presents extremely cogent arguments, and from my experience as well, this is something you simply can't handle, so you either misstate, avoid, or resort to crap like, well, As a matter of course. Finally, again, are you returning your, I'm sorry, the future's, rebate? Principle demands "yes." Of course, an honorable answer is something presumed here, so forget it.
The problem is is that guerilla is one of those people that believes in the uneven re-distribution of wealth, which seems counter to some of Pauls beliefs even, ironically. What guerilla fails to realize and or accept is that that money IS yours, and always was yours, not the governments. If guerilla saw what some of us paid in taxes every year, I think his tune might actually change... How dare someone actually use their own money to buy something.. egads!!! How many people got fucked by Clinton's retroactive tax take back way back when, show of hands? Some of us paid for Clinton and Gores salary combined that year just in retroactive taxes. Some of us had to borrow money just to pay taxes retroactively so that that money could be redistributed to people who don't work. Remember this one thing. In America, every dollar you earn is yours first, not the governments. If you get some of it back, don't think of it as a rebate, or gift, it was yours to begin with. Ultimately the only thing that will ever rectify the redistribution of wealth in America is to go to a USE only tax. Eliminating income tax across the board on both personal and corporate entities is the only way to achieve a fair tax system. This way, those that earn and spend will pay taxes. Those that do not, well, they will do the same thing they do now, NOTHING. I'm putting a new roof on my house with MY MONEY that I OVER PAYED INVOLUNTARILY. So, instead of my cash going to idiots in Washington that do stupid things like build bridges to no where, DR NO's 65 Earmarks I am putting my money where it belongs. Into our economy.
If it's no ones business, don't post it on a public forum. This is intarwebs 101 stuff dude. Look, Earl decided to ride me, then decided to take personal shots at me. He backed off for awhile when I let it be known I didn't appreciate it, but he continues to follow me around, much like you do, playing "guerilla stalker". My only concern with Mr. Cogent Argument, is why he continues to support Hillary (and Bill) Clinton, when they are part of the executive that starved and dehydrated 500,000 young children in Iraq with Food for Oil. That's it.
Odd day that you would lecture me on Ron Paul's positions, but I believe he is completely opposed to the stimulus package. A conservative does believe in the (sic) "uneven re-distribution of wealth". An even redistribution would be socialism or communism. When I buy something from the store, and I return it for a refund, then I have to bring the item back. They don't just hand me my money and let me keep the good that I purchased. That's what has happened here. This is incorrect. And the actions of the IRS are testament to it. Are you going to continue to consume the services and goods that are provided by deficit spending? You do realize (I hope), you didn't get your money back. The government borrowed it. The government is in a deficit scenario, with a massive national debt. It has no money to refund you. And because your taxes, and the taxes of your children, and their children are the collateral on debt (the means to repay) you are not only responsible for paying back the "stimulus" but you are also going to pay interest on it. Right now, we pay $400+ billion per year in interest (2006 ~ $406 billion). That's about $1,300 for every man, woman and child. Right now, you have a debtors share of $9.4 trillion in national debt. Your (sic) refund or (sic) overpayment is just more borrowing. You didn't get a refund, you took out a loan. I gather that you are in business Mia. And based on your posts, I'd assume someone else does the books.
The wierdness, twisted thinking and general lack of mental health exibited by guerilla couldn't be more apparant then when he started claiming that Clinton was responsible for 500,000 Iraqi deaths. Its as if Saddam Hussein never existed, never started a war against Iran and a war against Kuwait, didn't kill and torture Iraqi's didn't subjugate shiites or kurds in his own country and wasn't seen as a danger by the world population. Its as if all the nations and people that were involved in the UN oil for food process with Iraq.....just so Guerilla could find a way to blame Clinton for mass murder. Is as if reality didn't exist. Of course, I became a co-conspirator in this process according to Guerilla, because I disagree with him. Isn't that bizarre and evidence of an ill mind? but then we get this attack against others ...... not only does he exibit a sense of fantasy and reworks history so he can attack any action by the American govt at any time....but he similarly has the lowest regard for people who wish to spend their own money. It must be painful to live all alone in one's guerilla cage. ah...I shouldn't be surprised.....this is a person who thinks spending one's own money is worse than the crime of pedaphilia....
That's a strawman. First, the money is debt, more of the debt spending you espouse, that future generations will have to bear the debt load and servicing for. You're a big man spending someone else's money, by taking out a loan against their future earnings, and then having the unmitigated gall to call it "your own money". Second, I have never made a statement on pedaphilia. I don't expect more though. 500,000 dead children is a lot to have on your conscience. But I suppose that is the price of being a Clinton fan, isn't it?