Hillary Clinton: The Psycho Ex-Girlfriend of the Democratic Party

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by Blogmaster, May 8, 2008.

  1. webwork

    webwork Banned

    Messages:
    1,996
    Likes Received:
    47
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Hahaha omg that's funny shit right there....LOL

     
    webwork, May 8, 2008 IP
  2. iul

    iul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,263
    Likes Received:
    46
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    115
    #3
    the first comment is pretty funny too:

     
    iul, May 8, 2008 IP
  3. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #4
    Mia, May 8, 2008 IP
  4. wisdomtool

    wisdomtool Moderator Staff

    Messages:
    15,826
    Likes Received:
    1,367
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    455
    #5
    It is still hard to say if she is the "Ex" or would she still be the current girlfriend. The super delegates may still opt for Clinton over Obama, nothing is certain yet.
     
    wisdomtool, May 9, 2008 IP
  5. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #6
    It would behoove them to do that. Obama does not stand a chance.... At list Hil has a chance.

    Where the democrats screwed up..? Should have stayed with Edwards. We was the only real electable candidate.

    Now the Choices are:

    The Half Black / Half White version of Jimmy Carter
    A power hungry hose beast
     
    Mia, May 9, 2008 IP
  6. tsenseless

    tsenseless Active Member

    Messages:
    368
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #7
    tsenseless, May 9, 2008 IP
  7. Blogmaster

    Blogmaster Blood Type Dating Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    25,924
    Likes Received:
    1,354
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    380
    #8
    well since the democrate party is more or less a whorehouse to me, I will have to leave hearing anything closely related to committment ;)
     
    Blogmaster, May 9, 2008 IP
  8. webwork

    webwork Banned

    Messages:
    1,996
    Likes Received:
    47
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    lol McCain has no chance in hell of winning.

    I opt for the oreo Jimmy Carter.
     
    webwork, May 10, 2008 IP
  9. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #10
    No sweat off my back.. I'm not a McCain fan. And the last time Age was made a factor? The old guy won..


    Again, makes no real difference to me. I'm not a fan of McCain by any means. It's blatantly obvious he has more experience though, and will likely have the advantage.
     
    Mia, May 12, 2008 IP
  10. Zibblu

    Zibblu Guest

    Messages:
    3,770
    Likes Received:
    98
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    Bob Dole won? News to me!

    Good luck with that "experience" argument. America will not vote for 100 more years in Iraq/3rd term of George W. Bush. We've HAD IT with the neocons. Their time is over.

    Meanwhile Bob Barr spells doom for McCain.

    Obama should win by a wide margin without Barr - but with him we should definitely be talking double digits.

    My current prediction:

    Obama 55%
    McCain 40%
    Barr 4%
    Nader/Other 1%
     
    Zibblu, May 12, 2008 IP
  11. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #12
    Are you calling this the "HAHA" prediction?

    Obama has not yet been put to the test. In the interest of a clean campaign, Clinton and others have taken it very easy on Obama. If Obama eeks by Clinton in the primaries, its pretty clear that McCain will seek to take the Freshmen Senator to task. It will be interesting to say the least.
    BTW, where do you put Paul in that poll/prediction?
     
    Mia, May 12, 2008 IP
  12. WebdevHowto

    WebdevHowto Peon

    Messages:
    991
    Likes Received:
    23
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    That was funny, thanks for sharing!
     
    WebdevHowto, May 12, 2008 IP
  13. Arcanus

    Arcanus Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,021
    Likes Received:
    31
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    160
    #14
    hhahaha thats hilarious including comments on that page..

    I'd have to agree.
    From the little news we get here in australia about the us 08 election(actually zero on prime news..I read whatever onlinewe're getting 14min of sports news to 12min of rubbish news,that to me isn't newsworthy)
    From my observations its a race between hillary and obama..at first i thought they were in different parties!
    (oh how wonderful the education is here *rolls eyes*)
    To me it seems overwhelmingly mccain is just not in it.
    I'm hoping obama wins..becuase i wouldn't want hillary in..
    if she gets in..I do believe she would "obliterate iran"..and here comes world war 3/aka end of days..
    Wanna know what i'm worried about happening?? (I could be totally wrong on everything isaid in this post,I'm don't fully understand american politics..except after witnessing recent elections over the last decade it's all a load of crock)
    I'm worried that even if obama wins..hillary being vice president..and the shadow government conspiring to assasinate him..then she steps up and becomes president..

    disclaimer: this post may or may not reflect my opinions. umm yeah i'll leave it at that.
     
    Arcanus, May 12, 2008 IP
  14. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #15
    Iran is like a wart on a fleas ass in terms of military might. WW3 has been here since 2001 btw, and the end of days have yet to come. ;)
     
    Mia, May 13, 2008 IP
  15. Arcanus

    Arcanus Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,021
    Likes Received:
    31
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    160
    #16
    yep i agree.. it's not so much irans might or lack thereof,it's the backlash in mid east that would erupt bigtime if the invasion of iraq moved into iran.
     
    Arcanus, May 13, 2008 IP
  16. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #17
    I kinda doubt that too... No one over there really likes Iran very much.. Hell, even Iran's own people don't care for the mulla run Iran.

    Most of their people , youth particularly are very pro-western and pro-democracy.

    Iran will fall on its own and rise up free, and Christian without any help from us.
     
    Mia, May 13, 2008 IP
  17. Zibblu

    Zibblu Guest

    Messages:
    3,770
    Likes Received:
    98
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    1. The idea that Clinton has run a "clean campaign" is utterly ridiculous. She's pissed off many long time Democrats (like myself) due to the gutter campaign she's ran (and is still running.) Obama has already had to deal with all of BS distractions that Fox News wanted to throw at him. I actually now think it's a good thing as it's made the Wright story etc look extremely stale and it's only May. Imagine how stale they'll be by October?

    2. Paul has showed no indication that he is running as a 3rd party. I'm assuming Barr may pick up some of his support.

    3. McCain can take Obama to task all he wants. McCain is the one in for a surprise. Obama is the one who has ran a clean "gloves on" campaign against Clinton. He will not spare McCain in the same way. Obama knows the media is in McCain's back pocket so he's already shown some indications that he'll force stories like Keating 5 into the media by bringing them up himself. He must do that. Gore/Kerry proved you can't "stay above the fray." You have to mix it up. The Republicans fight dirty (as evidenced by McCain's disgusting Hamas BS) - so you have to fight back.
     
    Zibblu, May 13, 2008 IP
  18. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #19
    Interesting how Fox News is always thrown in there. You sound like a bot.

    Hillary and Obama have been given more time on Fox than McCain. Seems they get more fair and balanced air time than any other candidate, on Fox...

    Have you ever had an original thought of your own or do you just repeat the Fox News catch phrase to appear like you are informed?

    Neither Hillary nor Fox had or have anything to do with the damage that Wright has caused.

    It's pretty clear anyone in the Obama sucker camp is going to remain just that. The damage done by Obama and Wright caused issues with those on the fence or not in support of Obama. Where it hurts is in the swing voters and undecideds. I would have to say, that, coupled with Obama's lack of experience, arrogance and ignorant wife have pretty much lost my undecided vote.

    Paul pretty much always has been running as his own party. Nothing has really changed there.

    Barr is hoping for the Nader factor... I doubt his impact will be noticed much outside of Pluto or Mars.

    McCain does not have to take Obama to task. Obama needs to answer questions about what he plans to do to bring about change. He has not done that, probably will continue to not do that, and most likely, cannot do that.

    The media is in Obama's back pocket my friend. Have you been living under a rock for the past couple years? Obama can do no wrong with the media, the hollywood elite and the popular incumbent democrats.. He's the golden child of the media. Built up, never taken to task, never questioned, and always given as much latitude as he needs. The tough questions have always been for Hillary.

    No one has fought dirty with regard to Obama on the Republican side. He's not running in a general election. Its still the primaries, and that is where all the mud flinging has been on both sides.

    You have to realize that people who vote in this country, people who work in the this country, people who love this country do not vote for a person who has the audacity to say that "Wall Street tricked Americans out of their homes".

    Being American is about accepting personal responsibility, working hard and taking pride in all you do. Its not about shifting blame for stupid decisions onto the backs of those that work the hardest.

    If anything, Obama shines as another entitlement bound, weath redistributor hell bent on punishing those who achieve because its just not fair to those that do not.

    BOooHOoo...

    A vote for Obama is a vote for the redistribution of wealth.
     
    Mia, May 13, 2008 IP